Narrative Past and Present in Mitchell and Spark
This paper examines how the narrators in Maggie Mitchell's "It Would Be Different" and Muriel Spark's "The First Year of My Life" use their pasts to provide significance to their present circumstances. Despite the narrators' vastly different ages during the events they recall—one an adolescent and young woman, the other an infant—both stories demonstrate how personal history informs present identity and future trajectory. The analysis explores the structural and thematic role of memory in each narrative, showing how Spark uses infancy and World War I observation to explain the narrator's present emotional restraint, while Mitchell uses a long romantic history to justify the possibility of reconciliation. Both works illustrate how past experience functions as essential context for understanding present meaning.
- Introduction: Past and Present in Two Stories: Comparing narrator memory across two short stories
- Infancy and War in Spark's Narrative: Spark's infant narrator recalls WWI and emotional restraint
- Romantic History in Mitchell's Narrative: Mitchell's narrator uses long romantic history to justify reconciliation
- How Memory Creates Significance: Shared mechanism of past informing present meaning
- Conclusion: The Function of Recollection: Memory provides context for present emotional and relational outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Establishes a clear thesis early that distinguishes two narratives while identifying a unifying pattern—both narrators use memory to create present significance.
- Provides specific textual evidence for each story, including details about structural placement (opening/closing pages in Spark; spanning school days to present in Mitchell).
- Acknowledges meaningful differences between the works (infant vs. young woman narrator, 12-month span vs. years-long relationship) while drawing a coherent comparison.
- Explains the emotional and thematic consequences of each narrator's past—Spark's smiles, Mitchell's romantic hope—rather than merely listing plot points.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper employs structured comparative analysis, presenting parallel arguments about two literary works to identify a shared literary principle. Each body section mirrors the other's organization, first explaining how memory functions in Spark's story, then Mitchell's, before synthesizing the comparison. This parallelism reinforces the thesis without repetition, and the specific textual anchors (first page vs. final paragraph; school days to present) make the argument verifiable.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with thesis and context, moves into two parallel body sections (one per story), synthesizes the comparison in a brief section on shared significance, and closes with a summary that restates the central finding. This five-part structure is efficient for a short comparative essay, avoiding lengthy plot summary while maintaining focus on how narrative structure and memory function together to create meaning.
Introduction: Past and Present in Two Stories
There is a substantial difference in the representation of the past of the narrator in Maggie Mitchell's "It Would Be Different" and that of the narrator of Muriel Spark's "The First Year of My Life". This difference is largely attributed to the fact that the former was a young woman—and in some instances an adolescent—in her past, while the latter was an infant. Still, the past of each narrator greatly informs their respective presents. It does so most eminently by affecting the ending of each story. Essentially, the past of the narrators provides a degree of significance for the endings of their tales.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.