Nursing Handoffs: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence
This paper examines a systematic research review on nursing handoffs—the transfer of patient care information and responsibilities between healthcare providers. Drawing on 20 empirical studies from major medical databases, the review evaluates both the quality of existing research and best practices for safe handoffs. The paper discusses key findings regarding oral versus written communication systems, analyzes the methodological limitations of the research base, and identifies persistent gaps in understanding communication failures during care transitions. While evidence suggests written reporting may improve documentation accuracy, the review reveals inconsistencies in research aims, relatively low overall quality scores, and unaddressed concerns about patient-nurse contact, confidentiality, and the root causes of miscommunication in healthcare settings.
- Introduction and Definition of Nursing Handoffs: Nursing handoffs as critical care transitions and communication
- The Problem: Error Rates and Communication Failures: High prevalence of adverse events linked to handoff miscommunication
- Methodology and Quality Assessment of Reviewed Studies: Twenty studies reviewed using Quality Scoring System with low ratings
- Key Findings: Interventions and Comparative Systems: Oral versus written reporting systems and intervention effectiveness
- Critical Analysis and Methodological Limitations: Inconsistent research aims and poor integration of findings
- Unresolved Questions and Practical Concerns: Confidentiality, patient contact, and underlying causes of errors
- Conclusion: Evidence Gaps and Future Research Needs: Limitations of written-report conclusions and remaining questions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Provides a clear, evidence-based critique of an existing systematic review rather than simply summarizing it, demonstrating critical evaluation skills.
- Identifies specific statistical evidence of handoff-related adverse events (two-thirds of handoffs associated with problems, 17% with adverse events, 37% of errors due to miscommunication) to establish the significance of the problem.
- Systematically examines both strengths and weaknesses of the source review, including detailed discussion of quality assessment scores and their implications for the reliability of findings.
- Raises practical and ethical concerns (confidentiality, patient-nurse relationships, bureaucratic burden) that extend beyond the technical findings of the reviewed studies.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper exemplifies critical literature review analysis—the ability to evaluate not just the content of research but also its methodology, limitations, and implications. Rather than accepting the source review's conclusions at face value, the author examines the Quality Scoring System results (85% of studies scoring 8 or below), questions the consistency of research aims across studies, and identifies gaps between measured outcomes (patient satisfaction, overtime reduction) and actual clinical quality (error reduction, care accuracy). This meta-analytical approach models how to assess the strength of evidence within an existing review.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a problem-to-critique structure. It begins by establishing what nursing handoffs are and why they matter, then presents evidence of widespread communication failures. The middle sections detail the systematic review's methodology and findings, including specific interventions (walking rounds, bedside reports, written systems). The bulk of the paper comprises sustained critical analysis—examining inconsistencies in research aims, low quality scores, and unaddressed practical concerns. The conclusion synthesizes these critiques and identifies persistent unanswered questions about the nature of miscommunication and the trade-offs between oral and written systems.
Introduction and Definition of Nursing Handoffs
It is extremely rare that a single patient is overseen by the same nurse throughout the duration of his or her care. Additionally, nurses must frequently communicate orders to patients and their families before the patient is released. Thus, nursing handoffs—or a shift in care-related responsibilities—are a critical component of daily nursing practice. The purpose of the systematic research review, "Nursing Handoffs: A Systematic Review of the Literature," was to determine what safe and effective practices regarding this aspect of nursing care are based upon the evidence provided by existing empirical studies.
Handoffs are not simply a change in personnel; they are critical junctures of care where information may be lost or important connections may be made, which result in substantive improvements in patient health. In fact, handoffs are considered important enough that the Joint Commission on Nursing has a specific definition in its literature for the process. Handoffs take place when "information about patient/client/resident care is communicated in a consistent manner" either between healthcare providers or between providers and patients for the purposes of continuity of care (Riesenberg, Leisch, & Cunningham, 2010). However, communication failures often result in health-related problems or medical errors during the handoff process, and thus more intensive research is needed to determine why this occurs and how to improve the process.
The Problem: Error Rates and Communication Failures
In the initial literature review on the subject by Riesenberg, Leisch, and Cunningham (2010), the authors cite evidence supporting the value of the subject matter. Nearly two-thirds of all handoffs are associated with adverse events of some kind. An Australian study of more than 14,000 handoffs found that "17% were associated with an adverse event; [and] in 11% of those events, communication problems were found to be a contributing factor" (Riesenberg, Leisch, & Cunningham, 2010). Another study of medical errors during handoffs found that miscommunication between physicians and nurses was a determining factor in 37% of errors (Riesenberg, Leisch, & Cunningham, 2010).
Non-standardized communication patterns were cited as the most frequent reason for this issue, such as the different perspective between physicians and nurses or errors regarding abbreviations in transmitting vital patient data. Given these high rates of errors, the purpose of the systematic research review was to determine both the level of quality of research-based information on the subject of handoffs as well as to provide information about best practices.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.