This paper examines two interconnected issues in nursing practice. The first section critiques the cultural and professional implications of defining nursing primarily through the concept of "caring," arguing that this association with femininity and non-professionalism undermines nursing's scientific identity, contributes to unrealistic public expectations, and may fuel the phenomenon of nurses "eating their young." The second section applies social contagion theory to lifestyle-related illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes, and eating disorders, suggesting that community-based interventions and social modeling are essential tools for promoting healthier behaviors. Together, the two discussions highlight the importance of reframing nursing as both a rigorous science and a socially informed practice.
The paper effectively uses evidence from multiple sources — a professional nursing journal, a peer-reviewed epidemiological study, and personal clinical observation — to build layered arguments. This triangulation of evidence strengthens claims that would otherwise rest on anecdote alone and illustrates how reflective practice can be supported by empirical literature.
The paper is organized as two discrete but thematically linked responses. The first addresses the sociocultural construction of "caring" in nursing and its professional consequences. The second introduces social contagion theory as a framework for understanding and addressing lifestyle-related health issues. Each section concludes with a cited reference, indicating a short-answer or discussion-question format typical of nursing or health sciences coursework at the undergraduate or early graduate level.
One significant problem with the conception of "caring" in nursing is that the word is associated with femininity, non-professionalism, and the idea of tending to someone at home rather than in a clinical setting. Unfortunately, too much emphasis on caring in nursing can result in a loss of respect for the profession. Nursing theorists have worked hard and long to stress the scientific and empirical side of nursing care. But nursing is not the only profession that uses the language of caring. Teachers, social workers, and even sales associates are supposed to be "caring" in their work. Furthermore, should doctors and other healthcare professionals who are not nurses not be "caring?"
A poll of five non-nursing friends found that all of them thought of nursing — along with teaching — as one of the "caring" professions. Two specifically referred to the familiar phrase "angels of mercy," noting that nurses who had cared for ailing family members in hospital were angel-like in the concern they had shown. While this is heartening, it is also a very high ideal for nurses to live up to — and sometimes an impossible one.
As a nurse, one problem I frequently encountered due to the conceptualization of nurses simply as "caring" was that patients would often be upset when I was required to do something painful — such as draw blood or administer an injection. This was necessary in order to provide proper care, but it was not "caring" in a loving, tender sense. Caring for someone as a nurse requires skills and an attitude that are very different from caring for someone as a friend or parent.
The idea of nurses as inherently "caring" is also closely linked to the phenomenon known as nurses "eating their young." Because nurses are expected to be caring in such a broad sense — in a way that is impossible to fulfill in the day-to-day life of a healthcare provider — they may take out their frustrations on one another rather than on patients. This is counter-productive to nurses' mental health and ultimately harmful to the profession, given that it increases the rate of attrition among younger nurses.
In clinical work on the medical/surgical floor of an urban hospital, one encounters many individuals with lifestyle-related health issues. Heart disease, diabetes, and strokes may present as acute situations, but the real precipitating cause is often related to dietary and exercise choices made over the course of a lifetime. A relevant sociological concept that can help address this issue is social contagion: the idea that individuals tend to normalize their health behaviors in line with the lifestyle choices of their friends. If their friends make good choices regarding food, exercise, and preventative care, they are likely to do so as well. Conversely, if unhealthy habits — such as eating fast food and avoiding exercise — are "normal" within a social circle, all members of that group are less likely to heed good advice from healthcare providers, often until it is too late.
The concept of social contagion can be helpful when addressing lifestyle issues because it frames health as a community-based concern. Improving population health requires creating community spaces for healthy cooking classes and physical recreation, eliminating processed foods from local environments, and incentivizing healthier behaviors across an entire social network. Chronic disease prevention efforts that target communities rather than isolated individuals are therefore more likely to succeed.
Social cognition theory can also be important in reinforcing positive rather than negative behavioral norms. For example, among young adolescent girls, eating disorders are often observed to "spread" much like an infectious disease, as behaviors and attitudes are modeled upon one another (Forman-Hoffman & Cunningham, 2008). While these disorders, like lifestyle-related illnesses, may have a biological component, the clustering of such illnesses within specific geographic areas of the United States suggests that social modeling and contagion are also factors, and that their spread cannot be explained by biology alone.
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.