This paper examines the relationship between personal philosophy, professional nursing ethics, and the nursing meta-paradigm—the foundational concepts of person, environment, health, and nursing. The author argues that while nurses hold individual worldviews and values, these must not interfere with their duty to provide impartial, quality care to all patients regardless of background, belief, or circumstance. The paper addresses the tension between personal conviction and professional obligation, drawing on examples from healthcare controversies and nursing practice standards. It concludes that ethical nursing practice allows practitioners to maintain personal faith and values while upholding professional standards and avoiding discrimination.
This paper examines personal beliefs and values as they relate to nursing practice and the nursing paradigm. The nursing paradigm encompasses four core elements: person, environment, health, and nursing. This exploration also addresses what defines nursing itself and the implications for society. While religion, ethics, and morality are important ancillary topics, the overarching principle is that personal values and convictions should be maintained without compromising the quality of patient care.
A philosophy is a general credo or belief structure that guides a person's actions and decisions. However, personal philosophy and the philosophy enforced in professional practice may not always align perfectly. These two mindsets can intersect in negative ways when not managed carefully. For example, a Christian nurse who treats an atheist patient differently than a fellow Christian crosses moral, ethical, and potentially legal lines. However, it is important to note that religious affiliation does not necessarily lead to such behavior. Many hospitals are religiously affiliated yet make deliberate efforts to ensure that their institutional beliefs do not harm the care provided to patients with different worldviews.
The personal philosophy guiding this author's nursing practice centers on the desire to help heal and ease the suffering of patients, their families, and loved ones. Whether addressing the mental, physical, or medical distress of a patient, a worried new parent, or grown children caring for an elderly relative, the goal remains constant: to soothe and assist as many people as possible while maintaining quality standards and ethical principles. This approach acknowledges that nursing—like the broader medical field—is fundamentally about helping and soothing. Administrative staff, physicians, and all healthcare professionals share in this mission by working to deliver care efficiently and ensure proper billing and payment within legal and insurance guidelines.
Many assert that healthcare is a right. While some debate this premise, the conviction underlying this paper is that everyone deserves access to quality care and that systemic barriers to healthcare should be addressed. Society, however, seems increasingly self-centered and polarized. Despite the media's tendency toward sensationalism, healthcare professionals have a duty to deliver quality care with compassion regardless of external negativity or division. The quality of care should be identical whether a patient is injured in a car accident or a violent incident. Nurses and physicians cannot choose sides based on limited information; from a medical perspective, these distinctions are irrelevant. While triage protocols may prioritize the most critical cases, this is a clinical matter, not a moral judgment. The ethical and Christian approach is to do one's best for all those in need.
Understanding the nursing meta-paradigm requires a clear definition. A meta-paradigm is "a set of concepts and propositions that sets forth the phenomena with which a discipline is concerned" and represents "the most general statement of a discipline and functions as a framework in which the most restricted structures of conceptual models develop" (TFD, 2015). In practical terms, a meta-paradigm comprises the general statements, ethics, and rules that typically hold true, recognizing that generalizations always have exceptions. For instance, stealing is generally considered wrong, yet stealing bread to survive starvation changes the ethical calculus. Thus, it is fair to say stealing is generally wrong while acknowledging that absolute prohibitions without exception do not reflect most people's moral reasoning.
Applied to nursing, the meta-paradigm encompasses person, environment, health, and nursing as interconnected elements. However, the nursing meta-paradigm faces significant challenges in contemporary society. Many perceive that high-quality medical care is accessible primarily to the wealthy and privileged. While isolated instances of preferential treatment exist, the Hippocratic Oath and legal obligations to treat those in imminent danger of death override such disparities. Nevertheless, society has become deeply polarized along lines of class, income, race, gender, and other identity markers, and these divisions manifest visibly in healthcare. Recent controversies—including those surrounding the Affordable Care Act, Hobby Lobby, and reproductive healthcare access—demonstrate the extent to which healthcare policy and practice are entangled with social conflict.
Health itself is far more complex than access to medical care alone. Many prevalent diseases, such as diabetes and heart disease, result from years or decades of poor lifestyle choices and self-care habits. The four components of the meta-paradigm—person, environment, health, and nursing—all contribute to disease etiology, but person and environment are primary drivers of these chronic conditions. While genetics may predispose individuals to certain health problems, outcomes are rarely predetermined, and nurses play a vital role in helping patients reshape their futures through education and support. However, nurses and physicians cannot force patients to make healthier choices; they can only provide information, education, and encouragement. Data show that obesity rates remain stubbornly high among low-income and less-educated populations despite some overall improvements, reflecting the complex interplay of personal choice, environmental constraint, and socioeconomic opportunity (FRAC, 2015; CDC, 2014).
While many, including the author of this paper, state that a nurse's personal worldview should not influence professional care, the reality is more complicated. Racial, religious, and other animosities can profoundly influence both motivation and behavior, including in medical settings. Ethical nurses and physicians do not permit such biases to affect care; they uphold professional standards even when doing so requires personal restraint. However, while some might argue for exceptions based on a patient's criminal history or other factors, such considerations are not warranted. Healthcare decisions must remain grounded in clinical need and medical fact, not in judgments about how patients came to require care.
The roles of nursing encompass medical care delivery, physician support, protocol adherence, and emotional support for patients, families, and friends. Nurses have a responsibility to provide quality, timely care to all clients. For society, nurses must demonstrate that while they hold personal viewpoints and have the right to do so, these beliefs will not interfere with generally accepted professional and ethical standards. Nurses have a duty to professional practice: to follow appropriate protocols and directives while maintaining ethical integrity. Simply invoking "just following orders" is insufficient justification when broader ethical principles are at stake. Personal convictions and professional obligations inevitably interact, but doing the right thing must always take precedence. Professional codes of ethics provide guidance for this balance, helping nurses navigate situations where personal and professional values may diverge.
The nursing meta-paradigm as examined in this paper is supported by scholarly research. It is possible to misapply or overextend Christian ethics or other value systems, but there is nothing inherently problematic with Christian or other ethical frameworks in nursing practice provided they are applied correctly (Salladay, 2012). Allowing nurses to hold their own personal ethics while also maintaining professional and impartial standards creates a sustainable model of practice. The tendency of many individuals to make inflammatory, hyperbolic statements pollutes public discourse and must diminish. Everyone should contribute to best practices in healthcare while respecting differing viewpoints, all within the bounds of professional nursing ethics and the law.
You’re 98% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.