Public Image of Nurses: Perceptions, Stereotypes, and Reform
This paper presents a literature review of the public image of nurses and the nursing profession. Drawing on sources including Gallup polling data, peer-reviewed nursing journals, and advocacy organization guidelines, the paper explores the gap between how nurses perceive themselves and how the public perceives them. Topics include declining Gallup honesty ratings, self-image versus public image among Australian nurses, longitudinal studies of nursing students' guiding images, ethical definitions of the "good nurse," marketing campaigns aimed at recruitment, and historical representations of nurses from antiquity through the modern era. The paper concludes that nurses and their advocates must actively work to correct public misconceptions and raise the profession's profile.
- Introduction: Overview of nursing's evolving public image
- Gallup Poll Rankings and Ethical Standing: Gallup data on nurses' honesty and ethics ratings
- Self-Image Versus Public Image in Nursing: How nurses perceive themselves versus the public
- The Good Nurse: Ethics, Identity, and Professional Standards: Instructor-defined traits of the ethical good nurse
- Marketing, Advocacy, and Public Awareness Campaigns: Campaigns and strategies to improve nursing's image
- Historical and Media Representations of Nurses: Nursing imagery from antiquity to modern media
- Conclusion: Call for proactive image reform and public outreach
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Synthesizes a diverse range of sources — polling data, peer-reviewed journals, advocacy organization guidelines, and historical scholarship — into a coherent thematic narrative about the nursing image problem.
- Uses concrete statistics (e.g., declining Gallup percentages, Johnson & Johnson survey findings) to ground abstract arguments about public misperception in measurable evidence.
- Balances academic sources with practitioner-oriented publications, showing awareness of both scholarly and professional discourse in nursing.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective thematic literature synthesis. Rather than summarizing each source in isolation, the student groups findings around recurring themes — the honesty/ethics ranking, the self-image gap, advocacy strategies, and historical representation — allowing the sources to speak to one another and build a cumulative argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief framing introduction, then moves through the literature thematically: it begins with quantitative polling evidence, shifts to qualitative studies of nurse self-perception, addresses ethical frameworks for the "good nurse," examines marketing and advocacy responses, and closes with a historical account of nursing imagery. A short conclusion ties the themes together and restates the call for proactive image reform.
Introduction
The nursing profession has always attempted to project a positive, clean, and healthful image. Throughout history, the nursing industry has tried to portray nurses as angels of mercy and as ethically upstanding, helpful healthcare professionals — just a few steps below doctors in terms of medical authority. Lately, however, the image of nurses has changed, and not always for the better. This paper critiques the image of nurses through a review of the available literature.
Gallup Poll Rankings and Ethical Standing
The highly respected Gallup Poll ranks nurses at the top of several important professions in terms of "honesty and ethical standards" (Gallup, 2010). In a 2010 polling project, eighty-one percent of respondents rated nurses "very high" or "high." The second-ranked group was military officers, at 73%; third were druggists or pharmacists, at 71%; and fourth were grade school teachers, at 67% (Gallup, 2010).
In 2008, nurses ranked at the top with 84% of respondents rating them "very high" or "high," and in 2009 that figure was 83% (Gallup, 2010). One can see that while nurses consistently rank first for honesty and ethical behavior, the percentage has been gradually slipping — from 84%, to 83%, and down to 81% in 2010.
In an American Nurse Today article, Cohen (2007) acknowledges that nursing has appeared in the Gallup Poll's top ten "most honest and ethical" professions list. But Cohen wonders whether being highly ranked in the eyes of others is truly "relevant to the concern" nurses have about their image (p. 1). The author asks what truly matters to patients and caregivers, and what nurses "care about and look for in our colleagues" (Cohen, p. 1). Moreover, what impact do these perceptions have on the image of nurses? A central concern in Cohen's article is the need for nurses to take control of their image — including reconsidering workplace attire. Wearing clothing "adorned with cartoon characters" like SpongeBob and Snoopy, produced by manufacturers outside the nursing field, demeans the profession, according to Cohen and image consultant Sandy Dumont (p. 1).
To improve the image of nurses, Cohen lists several steps for professional accountability: leaders must define "unacceptable workplace behaviors" and hold nurses accountable; nurses should introduce themselves by name and title; proper appearance standards should be posted in written guidelines "and followed through with consequences for those who don't comply"; staff should participate in developing the list of unacceptable behaviors; nurses should write health-related articles for local newspapers; nurses should speak to community groups about the profession; and nurses should be trained in communication skills that allow them to "respond to negative colleagues in a manner that confronts and stops behaviors that affect nurses' image" (Cohen, p. 2).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.