This paper examines the social support factors and environmental influences that contribute to alcohol use and abuse among college students. Drawing on four key studies, the paper reviews epidemiological data on drinking prevalence, the health consequences of student alcohol consumption, the role of active and passive social pressure in driving drinking behavior, and the effectiveness of the social norms marketing intervention. The paper concludes with a focused research question and hypothesis proposing that low self-esteem may make certain individuals especially susceptible to social pressure, and that addressing this variable could serve as a more effective basis for campus-level alcohol reduction programs.
Alcohol use among college students has long been recognized as a persistent public health concern. O'Malley and Johnston (2002) analyze five different sources of data related to drinking among college students and note that alcohol use remains very high within this population. Key variables include the finding that males drink more heavily than females, that white students have a higher rate of drinking than Black and Hispanic students, and that alcohol use is more frequent among college students than among their non-college peers. Notably, college students who drank little or negligible amounts of alcohol before entering college go on to exceed their non-college counterparts in both the amount and consistency of their drinking.
This study is significant because it demonstrates a clear correlation between peer pressure toward drinking in college and the tendency to retain that habit after graduation. It suggests that if this pattern could be interrupted during the college years, fewer graduates would carry the inclination to drink into adult life.
Hingson et al. (2002) document the substantial rates of morbidity, disease, and injury found among college students that are directly related to alcohol consumption. The authors call for the development and implementation of prevention and treatment programs specifically targeting college students in order to discourage harmful drinking habits.
This research underscores the seriousness of alcohol use as a public health issue on college campuses and reinforces the urgent need to introduce evidence-based, alcohol-related prevention and treatment programs for this population.
An experiment conducted by Wood et al. (2001) indicated that both active and passive social influences — including perceived norms and direct social pressure to drink — are primary drivers of alcohol consumption among college students. The authors conclude that their results also point to a hypothesized process by which social factors influence cognition and, in turn, alcohol-related problems.
This finding is important because it demonstrates that the tendency to drink is positively correlated with an adolescent's desire to conform to group norms and social expectations. Understanding this mechanism is essential for designing interventions that address the root causes of student drinking rather than its symptoms alone.
The social norms marketing approach has been widely regarded as effective in reducing alcohol consumption among college students. However, in a study conducted by Wechsler et al. (2003) involving 37 colleges that employed the social norms marketing approach and 61 colleges that did not, no effective alcohol-reducing outcomes were found even when student exposure to the program and the length of the program's existence were taken into account. On the contrary, increased alcohol consumption was observed at schools employing the marketing approach. The authors consequently conclude that the social norms program is ineffective — and potentially counter-effective — in reducing alcohol consumption among college students.
"Why the dominant campus intervention falls short"
"Self-esteem, social pressure, and a new hypothesis"
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.