This literature review examines competing trends in elementary curriculum reform, drawing on peer-reviewed sources from Current Issues in Comparative Education and Early Childhood Research and Practice. The paper explores how market-driven and standardization-focused reforms often disadvantage ESL students and economically marginalized groups. It also addresses how international approaches in England, Germany, and Switzerland have attempted to tackle ethnic minority underachievement. The review further considers the role of gender bias in the hidden curriculum, the importance of Dewey's process-based learning philosophy, and how project-based instruction can coexist with state performance standards. Ultimately, the paper identifies the central tension between creative, inclusive pedagogy and rigid accountability measures in modern curriculum design.
According to a 2002 article from the peer-reviewed journal Current Issues in Comparative Education, one recent trend in elementary education has been an emphasis on the economic benefits of changes to the traditional curriculum. Educational innovations said to give students "a competitive edge" in gaining admission to the best schools — or to restore American competitiveness abroad, particularly in specialized and technical fields — have far greater appeal than reforms that merely purport to advance the pursuit of knowledge (Scoppio, 2002, p. 130).
However, the general direction of curriculum reform is at a crossroads. On the one hand, some reforms have been centralizing in nature, including the emphasis on state testing, standardizing the curriculum to meet state standards, creating evidence-based measurements of school effectiveness, and a new focus on teacher accountability. On the other hand, some reforms have been decentralizing, such as proposals for school-choice vouchers for students attending private schools, the growth of charter schools, and the creation of public magnet schools that students may test into or freely choose (Scoppio, 2002, p. 130).
According to Grazia Scoppio, current curriculum reform movements disadvantage students facing economic difficulties. The increasing diversity of the school population has made it progressively harder for disenfranchised students to reach standardized benchmarks of excellence. Where there is a large ESL population, standardized curricula can be unduly restrictive. ESL students and historically disadvantaged economic and ethnic groups tend to perform more poorly on standardized tests, which results in reduced funding for the schools in question. Ultimately, the students who stand to gain most from new reforms appear to be high-achieving students and those with middle-class parents who can conduct educated research into the available school options and choose accordingly (Scoppio, 2002, p. 130).
Curriculum reform that applies market-based standards to education often intensifies, rather than alleviates, institutional discrimination — defined as "the collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their color, culture, or ethnic origin" — according to Mechtild Gomolla in her 2006 article "Tackling Underachievement of Learners from Ethnic Minorities." Gomolla profiles several strategies for dealing with diversity in England, Switzerland, and Germany, all of which include providing additional funding for schools with high levels of ethnic minority students in order to support a specialized curriculum for second-language learners.
Germany's emphasis on tracking, designed to give immigrant students extra attention, was deemed more marginalizing than supportive, given that many schools simultaneously operated specialized programs for high achievers — effectively creating a class of "second-class" students among second-language learners. Switzerland's emphasis on learning skills rather than meeting predetermined performance standards was judged superior, even though Switzerland maintains a highly centralized school system (Gomolla, 2006, p. 54).
"Gender stereotypes and the hidden curriculum in classrooms"
"Dewey's principles of learning how to learn"
"Second-grade church project meeting Illinois state standards"
The new curriculum embodies different, sometimes contradictory impulses: it wants to encourage student creativity, give students more hands-on experience, and provide more individualized instruction to ensure America is more competitive. It also seeks to meet more rigorous, higher state performance-based standards in order to secure school funding and demonstrate a school's value in an era of expanded school choice. Teachers continue to search for effective strategies that are both creative and inclusive, yet ensure that their schools perform at a high standard and do not lose state and parental support.
You’re 45% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.