Verizon vs. AT&T: Financial Ratio Analysis and Investment
This paper presents a comprehensive financial analysis of Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ) using AT&T (NYSE: T) as a direct competitor benchmark. The analysis examines liquidity ratios, profitability metrics, and debt ratios for both firms over a five-year period ending in 2008. It also surveys the competitive landscape of the U.S. telecommunications industry and evaluates Verizon's options for raising capital. The paper concludes with recommendations from both a lender's and an investor's perspective, arguing that Verizon's strong industry position, growing wireless revenues, and recovering liquidity make it a sound choice for both lending and equity investment despite its elevated debt load.
- Introduction: Introduces Verizon and AT&T as subjects of analysis
- Liquidity Analysis: Compares short-term solvency ratios for both firms
- Profitability and Managerial Efficiency: Evaluates ROE, ROA, and ROI for both companies
- Debt Ratios and Leverage: Examines long-term debt levels and capital structure
- Gross and Net Profit Margins: Analyzes revenue-to-profit conversion for both firms
- The Telecommunications Industry: Describes competitive landscape of U.S. telecom sector
- Raising Capital and Investment Recommendation: Recommends debt financing and argues for investing in Verizon
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Systematically organizes financial metrics into distinct ratio categories (liquidity, profitability, debt), making the argument easy to follow and evaluate.
- Consistently benchmarks Verizon against both AT&T and industry averages, providing meaningful context for every figure cited.
- Applies financial analysis directly to actionable conclusions, culminating in clearly reasoned lending and investment recommendations.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies comparative financial ratio analysis — a core technique in corporate finance. Rather than simply listing numbers, the author interprets each ratio in relation to industry norms, historical trends, and competitor performance, demonstrating how raw data translates into strategic insight. The structure mirrors a professional equity research report, moving from short-term solvency through long-term leverage to ultimate investment judgment.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief framing section identifying the two firms and the analytical scope. It then works through four distinct ratio categories in separate sections, each following the same pattern: define the ratio, present Verizon's figures with historical context, compare to AT&T, and deliver a verdict. Two additional sections address industry context and capital-raising options. The paper closes with dual recommendations — one for a prospective lender, one for a prospective equity investor — synthesizing all prior analysis into a final investment thesis.
Introduction
The company chosen for this financial analysis is telecommunications giant Verizon (NYSE: VZ). The competitor used for comparison is AT&T (NYSE: T). Both firms compete in the landline and wireless telecommunications industries, each maintaining broad national customer bases that include individual consumers as well as small and large businesses. They are engaged in intensive competition across both segments and face similar challenges with respect to their regulatory, economic, and technological environments. This paper analyzes both firms through the lens of their financial ratios and historical trends, before arriving at a conclusion about investing in Verizon.
Liquidity Analysis
Liquidity analysis indicates the degree of short-term financial solvency at a firm. The key ratios are the current ratio, the quick ratio, the cash ratio, and times interest earned. The current ratio indicates the firm's ability to meet its current liabilities through conversion of all its current assets; the quick ratio includes only cash and receivables; and the cash ratio includes only cash.
For Verizon, the current ratio for 2008 was 1.0 — the strongest current ratio in the past five years. In prior years, Verizon's current ratio was significantly weaker, ranging from 0.69 to 0.84. AT&T, by contrast, had a current ratio of 0.53, a figure significantly poorer than Verizon's and consistent with AT&T's recent performance.
The quick ratio for Verizon in 2008 was 0.84, representing an improvement over figures from previous years, largely attributable to a substantial increase in cash. Cash improved from $3.3 billion in 2007 to $10.2 billion in 2008. AT&T's quick ratio in 2008 was 0.42, which is consistent with that firm's performance in previous years.
The cash ratio for Verizon in 2008 was 0.39, a substantial improvement over 0.13 the previous year and an improvement over each of the prior four years. AT&T's cash ratio was 0.04, roughly in line with its recent performance.
Times interest earned reflects a firm's ability to meet its interest obligations. In the financial statements reviewed, neither firm reported a separate interest expense — this was included within the broader category of operating expenses. Without a specific interest expense figure, it is not possible to calculate times interest earned for either firm.
Overall, Verizon has healthy liquidity ratios, particularly in comparison to those of AT&T. At no point in the past five years did AT&T record any liquidity ratio better than the comparable figure from Verizon. Whereas AT&T displays some alarming short-term liquidity concerns — especially its very low cash ratios — Verizon's figures are fairly strong given the high levels of capital investment required in this industry.
Profitability and Managerial Efficiency
Profitability ratios are indicative of a firm's overall financial performance. These figures are important to investors and can also serve as an indicator of managerial efficiency. When profitability ratios decline, it is often a symptom of deeper problems within the firm.
Return on equity (ROE) measures the net profit a company earns for its shareholders relative to its equity base. Verizon's current ROE is 12.9%, with a five-year average of 13.7% — figures slightly above the industry average. AT&T has an ROE of 11.2%, with a five-year average of 10.7%, lagging both Verizon and the industry. Both firms earn decent returns on shareholder equity, but their underperformance relative to the industry average suggests room for improvement. Notably, while AT&T improved its ROE in the most recent year, Verizon's figure slipped, indicating somewhat weaker performance through 2008.
Return on assets (ROA) measures net profit generated from the firm's assets and is a direct measure of managerial efficiency. Verizon's 2008 ROA was 3.6%, compared with an industry average of 4.4%. Its five-year average ROA is 3.3%, again trailing the industry average of 4.4%. This indicates that while Verizon has improved year-over-year, it continues to trail the industry in asset utilization. AT&T's ROA in 2008 was 4.4%, exactly in line with the industry, and its five-year average of 4.3% is only marginally below the benchmark. Overall, AT&T demonstrates stronger managerial efficiency with respect to asset deployment.
Return on investment (ROI) measures how much profit is earned for every dollar invested in generating that profit. Verizon's 2008 ROI was 5.2%, compared to an industry average of 5.5%. Its five-year average is 4.7%, against the industry's 5.4%. AT&T's 2008 ROI was also 5.2%, with a five-year average of 5.0%. Both figures trail the industry, but AT&T's are stronger than Verizon's.
Overall, AT&T outperforms Verizon on all three key measures of managerial efficiency. AT&T's managers demonstrate a greater ability to convert the fiscal and physical resources at their disposal into profit.
Works Cited
MSN Moneycentral Verizon. Retrieved October 24, 2009 from
MSN Moneycentral AT&T. Retrieved October 24, 2009 from
Loth, R. (2009). Financial Ratios Tutorial. Investopedia. Retrieved October 24, 2009 from http://www.investopedia.com/university/ratios/
Chen, B. (2009). Verizon iPhone? Don't hold your breath. Wired. Retrieved October 24, 2009 from
Crockett, R. & Grow, B. (2006). AT&T rings a familiar bell. Business Week. Retrieved October 24, 2009 from http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2006/tc20060306_470983.htm
Megna, M. (2009). AT&T: Go easy on wireless industry regulation. InternetNews.com. Retrieved October 24, 2009 from
Herperger, D. (2008). U.S. wireless industry: Key developments in 2007. Videotron. Retrieved October 24, 2009 from
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.