Essay Undergraduate 580 words

Zoom vs. Microsoft Financial Statement Comparison

~3 min read 4 sections Accounting · Financial Statement

Abstract

This paper presents an individual financial analysis comparing Zoom and Microsoft across their 2019–2020 fiscal years. It examines revenue growth, total asset values, and long-term solvency through debt ratio calculations, finding that Zoom experienced dramatically faster growth (88.3%) compared to Microsoft's more modest 13.6% increase. The paper also explores how each company's operational nature — Zoom as a pure service provider and Microsoft as a manufacturing-oriented entity — drives fundamentally different accounting practices, particularly around inventory valuation, cost of goods sold, and production budgeting. The analysis concludes with reflections on COVID-19's role in accelerating Zoom's growth.

Key Takeaways

Introduction and Revenue Growth Overview: Zoom vs. Microsoft revenue growth compared
Asset Values and Long-Term Solvency: Total assets and debt ratio analysis
Accounting Practice Differences: Service vs. Manufacturing: COGS, inventory, and production budget differences
Reflections and Conclusions: COVID-19 impact and lessons learned

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

Uses concrete financial figures (e.g., 88.3% vs. 13.6% revenue growth, $1.2B to $5.2B asset growth) to ground comparisons in verifiable data rather than vague claims.
Applies specific financial ratios — notably the debt ratio — to compare long-term solvency, demonstrating analytical rather than purely descriptive reasoning.
Clearly distinguishes between service and manufacturing accounting models, connecting operational differences to specific accounting concepts like COGS, inventory accounts, and production budgets.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates comparative financial analysis by systematically placing two companies side by side across multiple dimensions — revenue, assets, solvency, and accounting methodology — rather than analyzing each in isolation. This parallel structure allows the reader to see relative strengths and differences clearly, a technique well suited to financial statement analysis assignments.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with revenue and asset growth comparisons, then moves into solvency analysis using debt ratios, transitions to a discussion of how industry type shapes accounting practices, and closes with a brief personal reflection on what was learned and the role of COVID-19 in Zoom's growth. The structure follows a logical progression from quantitative data to qualitative interpretation.

📘 Read the full essay guide → Build your outline → Generate a thesis → Generate citations → 📚 More Financial Statement examples →

Essay 580 words

Introduction and Revenue Growth Overview

To a large extent, the financial statements of both companies indicate that there has been a sustained increase in both income and shareholders' equity. However, Zoom registered greater revenue growth than Microsoft within the two years under consideration — between 2019 and 2020. More specifically, while Zoom experienced an 88.3% increase in revenue during this period, Microsoft registered a 13.6% increase in the same timeframe. This significant difference in growth rates reflects the contrasting trajectories of a rapidly scaling cloud-based communications company and a well-established technology conglomerate.

Asset Values and Long-Term Solvency

There was also significant growth in total asset value over the two-year period in the case of Zoom. While the company had total assets of $1.2 billion in 2019, the total asset figure for 2020 was $5.2 billion — representing a 310% increase in asset value. Microsoft's total assets increased from $286 billion to $301 billion. It is clear from the financial statements of both companies that Microsoft holds considerably more assets on its balance sheet overall. However, being a manufacturing-oriented entity, a large portion of its asset category consists of inventory.

In seeking to determine which company is in better financial health, it is also necessary to consider their long-term solvency. Financial leverage ratios, as Franklin, Graybeal, and Cooper (2019) observe, can be particularly useful in this endeavor. One such ratio is the debt ratio, computed by dividing total debt by total assets. In the case of Microsoft, the total debt ratio is 0.19. In the case of Zoom, the debt ratio is 0.07. This indicates that both companies have more assets than debt. As Sittle and Wearing (2008) point out, "a debt ratio less than 100% indicates that a company has more assets than debt" (p. 311). However, the lower ratio in Zoom's case demonstrates that equity funds a greater proportion of its assets.

2 Sections Hidden · 235 words

Accounting Practice Differences: Service vs. Manufacturing155 words

Both companies utilize different accounting practices owing to the fact that they have diverse operational characteristics. This is especially true given that while Microsoft could be considered…

Reflections and Conclusions80 words

From my assessment of the accounting information, I learned that there are quite a number of differences in the manner in which manufacturing and service entities maintain their accounting records. I am also of the opinion that the enhanced profitability on…

View Full Document

References

Franklin, M., Graybeal, P., & Cooper, D. (2019). Principles of Accounting. 12th Media Services.

Sittle, J., & Wearing, R. (2008). Financial Accounting. SAGE.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Revenue Growth Debt Ratio Financial Solvency Total Assets Cost of Goods Sold Inventory Valuation Service vs. Manufacturing Financial Statements COVID-19 Impact Accounting Cycle