Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
First of all, statistically and from a management point-of-view, it does not give a clear representation of the actual progress of the company. If we take the net revenues from sales, for example, this may point out during a certain month of the year, February for example, extremely high levels and could show a spectacular increase in overall sales. Nothing could be more false: it only records payments that were not made during December and the pre-holiday season and that were left for after the holidays. In this sense, the company could have actually sold nothing in February, but only counted the payments made for sales in December.
As such, if we look at this previous example, we may conclude that the cash method, while reflecting the cash situation in the company, does not reflect the evolution and the actual state of the business and the company.
Following the reasoning presented previously, the accrual methodology has two distinct advantages over the cash method. First of all, it "is more accurate in terms of net income." Indeed, at any given time, you are able to evaluate overall net income provided by the company's operations.
Second of all, it is "more realistic for measuring business performance." As I have previously discusses, the accrual method lets a manager analyze and decide on the actual performances of the company. In this sense, if he were to look in December over the accounting books, he would be able to see the actual sales figures, as the company had produced them the respective month.
In general, companies that have gross annual sales exceeding $5 million are recommended to use the accrual methodology. Indeed, we are entitled to believe that in large companies, operating large revenues and expenses, it is critical to know and record how the business is evolving. Additionally, any miscalculations could prove fatal. On the other hand, businesses with significant inventories are also inclined towards accrual methods.
Cash accounting is generally used by small businesses that are in the first year of business. The explanation for this is quite simple. The cash method is quite easy to use and extremely intuitive: whenever you pay money or you receive money, you...
Another benefit is somewhat the reverse of what I have previously mentioned when discussing the accrual method: you can deduct taxes by recording the income the following fiscal year, when it is actually received.
On the other hand, in order "to have accurate accounting information that can be used to make important business decisions" the accrual accounting method is generally recommended. As I have described previously, recording the income and expenses as they produce and are contracted ensures a clear picture about the level of expenses and revenues at a certain period.
Most companies have therefore adopted nowadays the accrual methodology. The complex economical environment in which they evolve and operate has turned this into a necessity.
Bibliography
1. Klinefelter, Danny; McCorkle, Dean (2003). Financial Management: Cash vs. Accrual Accounting. Agricultural Communications, the Texas a&M University System. On the Internet at http://trmep.tamu.edu/cg/factsheets/rm5-16.html
2. Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (April 2000). On the Internet at http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/04/19194.html
3. Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (April 2000). On the Internet at http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/04/19194.html
4. Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (2004). Business Owner's Toolkit. On the Internet at http://www.toolkit.cch.com/text/P06_1340.asp
Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (2004). Business Owner's Toolkit. On the Internet at http://www.toolkit.cch.com/text/P06_1340.asp
Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (April 2000). On the Internet at http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/04/19194.html
Klinefelter, Danny; McCorkle, Dean (2003). Financial Management: Cash vs. Accrual Accounting. Agricultural Communications, the Texas a&M University System. On the Internet at http://trmep.tamu.edu/cg/factsheets/rm5-16.html
Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (April 2000). On the Internet at http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/04/19194.html
Zall, Milton (June 2001). Accounting: Cash vs. Accrual. On the Internet at http://www.wconline.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/features/BNP__Features__Item/0%2C3299%2C28259%2C00.html
Bibliography
1. Klinefelter, Danny; McCorkle, Dean (2003). Financial Management: Cash vs. Accrual Accounting. Agricultural Communications, the Texas a&M University System. On the Internet at http://trmep.tamu.edu/cg/factsheets/rm5-16.html
2. Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (April 2000). On the Internet at http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/04/19194.html
3. Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (April 2000). On the Internet at http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/04/19194.html
4. Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (2004). Business Owner's Toolkit. On the Internet at http://www.toolkit.cch.com/text/P06_1340.asp
Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (2004). Business Owner's Toolkit. On the Internet at http://www.toolkit.cch.com/text/P06_1340.asp
Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (April 2000). On the Internet at http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/04/19194.html
Klinefelter, Danny; McCorkle, Dean (2003). Financial Management: Cash vs. Accrual Accounting. Agricultural Communications, the Texas a&M University System. On the Internet at http://trmep.tamu.edu/cg/factsheets/rm5-16.html
Cash vs. Accrual Accounting (April 2000). On the Internet at http://www.inc.com/articles/2000/04/19194.html
Zall, Milton (June 2001). Accounting: Cash vs. Accrual. On the Internet at http://www.wconline.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/features/BNP__Features__Item/0%2C3299%2C28259%2C00.html
Accounting and Intrusion Detection In a report issued by Paladin Technologies, Inc., entitled: "Security Metrics: Providing Cost Justification for Security Projects," 273 organizations were surveyed on the topic of security. The report illustrates in quantifiable terms the depth and reach of intrusion detection on the financial viability of the organization. The combined reported losses from the firms surveyed totaled $265.6 million in 1999. The highest loss categories were reported as follows: Type
Accounting Theory Why accounting research has had so little impact on preventing such failures in accounting practice? The modern economic society has seen many scientific researches that have been directed at establishing the nature of performance of economic activities. The present world is a literate society that depends on the technicalities of life and assumption of activities as they happen in the natural society. In order to have a genuine avenue of
Accounting Approach to Valuation by GAAP and IFRS: Key Differences When it comes to valuation by U.S. GAAP and IFRS, there exists a number of differences in terms of the approaches used. To begin with, in regard to inventory valuation, both FIFO and LIFO are permitted in the case of U.S. GAAP. On the other hand, IFRS do not permit the usage of LIFO. However, in the latter case, FIFO is permitted
Accounting Information for Decision Making Corporate Confirming on Water Risk (Feb 2010) indicates that the Global Confirming Initiative (GRI) G3 Guidelines' five water-related indications (total withdrawal volume by source, ponds considerably impacted by distributions, percentage and total amount of water recycled and used again, total water discharge by quality and destination, and identification water physiques and related habitats impacted by discharges) make the perfect beginning point for assessing and confirming water
Accounting standards and IFRS adoption in Cambodia and Thailand The significance of accounting standards Accounting may be considered as a business language through which the statistical results can be acquired which help in analyzing how well the firm is functioning. They give out timely statements of these statistics and help the stakeholders get all the information they need. Accounting is like a separate language which has its own grammar and these outlines
This is often referred to as the "acid test." The standard range is 1.8:1 for a young company versus.9:1 for a more developed company. Using these benchmarks gives banks a frame of reference from which to measure. Other indicators to banks include comparing the % of the Cost of Goods Sold on the income statement to industry averages. This gives an indication of the firm's profit margin with regard to