There are numerous technical intricacies to neurobiological research. The human brain is a completely intricate mechanism and holds numerous neurons. This creates problems in studying consciousness particularly in comprehending how brain processes trigger human consciousness, and how the brain realizes consciousness. The major aspect of perception is that for every conscious condition, people experiences some qualitative disposition to that state of being consciousness. In this regard, this paper assesses the disparity amid semantic and syntactic knowledge. The paper also highlights the disparities between knowledge content and form, and ascertains the effects of knowledge content and form when evaluating the intelligence of a machine.
Consciousness refers to the state of being responsive towards ones setting. It is the state or condition of wakefulness where one is able to recognize some inner thoughts or feelings or external objects. Scores of philosophers have tried to understand the temperament of consciousness and its substantive properties. Consciousness is synonymous with mind. This is in the view of the fact that neurobiological processes of the brain prompt consciousness and are identified in the structures of the brain. As a result, consciousness is different from other natural or biological occurrences given that consciousness holds a first-person or subjective ontology where the subjective ontology never block people from holding an epistemically idea science of perception. Human beings need to triumph over the ideas that views physical and mental as two different spheres. According to John, consciousness is biological problem since consciousness is a biological occurrence just like growth or digestion. However, unlike other biological procedures the definition of consciousness is intricate and holds significant features. These features include unity, subjectivity and qualitativeness. With respect to qualitativeness, all conscious conditions hold a given qualitative feel. For instance, the tasting bear is not similar to hearing something.
In the Electronic Reserve Reading "Consciousness," John Searle poses some basic questions regarding the subjectivity of consciousness and whether this is strictly a biological process. What do you think of these arguments? What are your own conclusions?
I think John Searle is exactly right in the development and implementation of the arguments in relation to the concept of consciousness and the biological process. A theory of consciousness should have the ability to explain on how the set of neurobiological processes cause a system to fall in the subjective state of awareness or sentience. I believe this concept is unlike anything else in biology despite the fact that it is one of the essential and amazing features of nature. It is essential to resist subjectivity because of the objectivity of science in relation to examination of human interactions on a daily basis. This is an expression of the concept of epistemic objectivity rather than ontological objectivity like in the case of chemistry and physics. It is essential to focus on the reality of subjective states of consciousness if it appears that science is supposed to offer an account of how the world operates (Searle, 2000).
This proposal indicates that subjective states of consciousness must be part of this world under the influence of science. It is also vital to note that the modern biologists face challenges and obstacles in the study of consciousness. I believe that it is applicable in the modern society to view consciousness as a biological problem. This is through relation of the state of consciousness to the operation of the human brain thus effective in the analysis of the scientific aspect of the philosophical or psychological problem (Palmer, 1998). It is essential to understand the operation of the brain in analyzing the aspect of consciousness as a biological problem. This will facilitate the application of conscious artifacts of non-biological materials focusing on the duplication rather than stimulation of the brain thus enhancing the understanding of the operation of the brain the development of the state of consciousness (Tallis, 2010).
What is the difference between syntactic knowledge and semantic knowledge? Cite examples from your own experience.
In the process of understanding knowledge, there are two categories of the concept: syntactic and semantic. These categories of knowledge apply differently and uniquely in relation to the situation, individual, and other influencing or determining factors. Syntactic or syntax knowledge focuses on manipulation of things, events, or situations without focusing on the essence of concepts. This indicates that the individual has the ability to manipulate the situation without grasping the concepts relating to the event. An example for the concept of syntactic knowledge is the ability to type without knowing the language. Another critical scenario in which syntactic knowledge is applicable is the learning on how to turn a radio on without the ability to understand the sounds. These express how individuals manipulate things without focusing on the concepts.
The second category of knowledge (semantic) focuses on the incorporation or integration of concepts in the manipulation of things. This is an indication that there must be critical understanding of the concepts in order to manipulate any relevant situation. For example, it is important to understand the language we type in to constitute semantic knowledge. Unlike the previous category of knowledge where one can type without understanding the language, it is vital to understand the language in this category (semantic). Another example in relation to semantic knowledge is the ability to understand the words and other content of the music. These express the ability of an individual to understand the content of the event, activity, or situation in order to achieve quality manipulation. It is also essential to note that thank you and gracias have same semantics or meaning, but unique syntax. This indicates that semantic knowledge focuses on the meaning while syntactic knowledge operates towards illustration of the ability to manipulate an event or situation.
Using examples from your own experience, discuss the difference between the form and content of knowledge. What are the implications of the form and content of knowledge when assessing machine intelligence?
To understand the concept of knowledge in the modern society and scientific approaches, it is essential to differentiate between the form and content of knowledge. Form of knowledge refers to the categories, kings, or types of knowledge. This indicates understanding or studying of different aspects of knowledge with the aim of integrating numerous categories of knowledge. Content of knowledge, on the other hand, relates to the constitution of the type or form of knowledge. This is an illustration of the components of the form of knowledge. It relates to the approaches or concepts with reference to the form of knowledge. Examples of form of knowledge include semantic and syntactic concepts. An example of content of knowledge relates to the information from within the institution's curriculum.
Form and content of knowledge have critical implications in the assessment of the machine intelligence. One of the critical implications is enhancement of the understanding of the operation of the machine in relation to execution of the duties and obligations in any relevant situation. It is also vital to understand the role of the form and content of knowledge to provide an assessment of the machine intelligence through analysis of the various concepts. Form and content of knowledge also promotes understanding of the relationship between machine and events or environments. This is essential in the evaluation of the concepts and operations of the systems with the aim of understanding its contribution towards the achievement of the goals and objectives. This is an indication that form and content of knowledge are valuable in understanding and interpretation of the machine intelligence.
What is the difference between the concepts of thinking, consciousness, and knowledge in relation to machine intelligence and human intelligence?
There is a clear difference in relation to concepts of thinking, consciousness, and knowledge while focusing on the human and machine intelligence. Concepts of thinking relates to both consciousness and knowledge in…