Federal Campaign Contribution Laws For Presidential And Vice Presidential Research Paper

Federal Campaign Contributions Over the last several years, this issue of campaign finance has been increasingly brought to the forefront. This is because the influences of the affluent and special interests in the field of politics have become more perverse. However, the issue of the involvement of special interests in elections has been a major challenge (with the founding fathers warning about how this is a threat to democracy). ("The Presidential Election")

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that limits placed on campaign contributions (i.e. soft money) are unconstitutional. This has opened the flood gates for many different groups to establish political action committees (PACs) that will provide unlimited donations to candidates. This is going directly against the very laws which are designed to limit the influence of the special interests. As, there is a patchwork of regulations that are not supported by: consistent rulings from the courts. Instead, a select amount of laws are applicable. While other regulations (i.e. McCain Feingold) have been struck down (which is giving these groups unprecedented access to political candidates).

In the Presidential campaign, this lack of regulation means that PACs are forming...

...

The way that this occurs, is through the use of soft money to: allow large organizations to establish a PAC and contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to the campaign. To fully understand what is taking place requires looking at: the mechanisms involved during the process, specific issues when these laws are applicable, how this impacting the election, the way this will affect the balance of power and how this relates to business law. Together, these different elements will offer the greatest insights as to the strengths and drawbacks of the current system. ("The Presidential Election")
A brief scope of the, intent, mechanics, and effects of the law for Federal Contributions to Campaigns for the President and VP

The basic intent of campaign finance laws is to limit the influence of the special interests in the process. The mechanism that is used to enforce these regulations is the Federal Election Commission. They have the power to monitor and enforce federal laws when it comes to the areas of campaign finance. In general, this has worked for limiting certain kinds of personal contributions from wealthy individuals. However, as time went by, many of these individuals have formed different PACs (which are designed to go around the various campaign finance laws). The impact is that, this provided a basic foundation for regulating contributions. The problem is that many of these guidelines need to be updated (to address the loop holes that special interests are taking advantage of). ("A Century of Campaign Finance Laws")

Cite a relevant issue or incident that the law is applied, when it is violated, and abused…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

"The 2012 Presidential Election." Open Democracy, 2012. 20 Apr. 2012 <http://www.opendemocracy.net/frank-groome/2012-us-presidential-election-issues-to-dominate-distract-and-influence>

"A Century of U.S. Campaign Finance Laws." NPR, 2012. Web. 20 Apr. 2012 <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121293380>

"John Edwards Repays $1.2 Million." Inquisitr, 2012. Web. 20 Apr. 2012. <http://www.inquisitr.com/218391/john-edwards-repays-2-1-million-in-campaign-finances/>

"Obama Romney Campaign Commercials." CBS News, 2012. Web. 20 Apr. 2012 <http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/04/20/obama-romney-campaign-commercials-give-hint-of-ad-war-to-come/>
Bolton, Alan. "Romney and Obama Super PACs." The Hill, 2012. 20 Apr. 2012 <http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/212547-donors-backing-romney-and-obama-super-pacs-spent-tens-of-thousands-on-lobbying>
MLA Format. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/


Cite this Document:

"Federal Campaign Contribution Laws For Presidential And Vice Presidential" (2012, April 22) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/federal-campaign-contribution-laws-for-presidential-56402

"Federal Campaign Contribution Laws For Presidential And Vice Presidential" 22 April 2012. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/federal-campaign-contribution-laws-for-presidential-56402>

"Federal Campaign Contribution Laws For Presidential And Vice Presidential", 22 April 2012, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/federal-campaign-contribution-laws-for-presidential-56402

Related Documents

S. interests in that part of the world. Then, on January 17, 1991, the U.S. launched the first attack, with more than 4,000 bombing runs. After 100 hours, Bush called off the offensive, saying he wanted to minimize U.S. casualties. Though Bush was criticized for this withdrawal being premature, the U.S. made a retreat from Kuwait after the successful offensive, and Bush's approval ratings reached new highs. Bush announced in early 1992,

In this regard, Lott points out, "Between 70% and 80% of police departments explicitly use norming of physical standards in their hiring practices. However, most of the departments that use objective standards do not enforce these rules. Women who fail to meet the absolute standards during academy training are unlikely to be failed out of the program" (p. 276). This lack of consistency in how these standards are applied

Clinton's Lewinsky Speech Presidential scandal speeches should be considered a unique form of discoursed that follow a common pattern and have similar elements. All of these may not be found in every single speech but most certainly will, including Richard Nixon's Second Watergate Speech (1973), Ronald Reagan's Iran-Contra Speech (1987), and Bill Clinton's Monica Lewinsky Speech (1998). All the presidents used strong, direct and active voice when making these speeches, with

Nixon and Watergate It Was
PAGES 10 WORDS 4038

Kennedy won the election by a very narrow margin, 120,000 votes or 0.2% of the electorate. Most historians believe that the primary reason John F. Kennedy won the Presidential Election was because of the non-verbal "poor body language" on the television debate with Richard Nixon in 1960 -- especially valid since radio audiences overwhelmingly voted that Nixon had won the debate. Nixon's body language was furtive, he was perspiring,

Even more generally, there are other examples of equally basic contradictions that qualify under the adherence-to- governing-law standard. Despite the official Supreme Court interpretation of the Establishment Clause in the First Constitutional Amendment, U.S. currency still features the words "In God We Trust." Similarly, several states still enforce Sunday blue laws such as prohibiting the sale of alcohol on the Christian "Sabbath." Many legal experts suggest that both violate

Interest Groups A FORCE TO RECKON WITH Special Interest Groups An interest group, or a special interest group, is a group of concerned individuals who share common goals (JB-HDNP, 2012). They connect the public to lawmakers and vice versa. They try to sway public opinion, election, and public policy (JB-HDNP). Special interest groups make strong demands on the government (Magleby et al., 2010). These groups may be economic or occupational, ideological, public interest,