Knowledge Is Not Sense-Perception Plato Relies In Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
577
Cite
Related Topics:

Knowledge Is Not Sense-Perception Plato relies in debating the true nature of knowledge in the same manner as his tutor, Socrates, assuming and arguing that knowledge was not only about the perception of our senses, as many pf the Ancient philosophers sustained. In this sense, in his work Theaetetus, Plato argues that knowledge can be objective, debating the nature and problems of knowledge.

Attacking Protagoras's belief that "man is the measure of all things," Plato, through the voice of Socrates, claims that perception is only part of knowledge, a mere component of a much larger process. The reason for this is that perception does not cover many of the key truths our existence is guided by. Additionally, rational analysis plays another great deal in the way knowledge is formed. So, in this sense, Plato seems to see knowledge as the sum of different objective experiences...

...

After modernism and post-modernism, however, the notion of truth and knowledge is as diffuse as ever and it is hardly likely that we can rely on objective rationalism any more, as many of the issues happening around us bear too much the irrational stigmata.
On the other hand, we should admit that many of Plato's beliefs, especially some of the ideas mentioned here above, are still quite actual for anybody who can still believe in rationalism as the utmost way in finding the truth. Indeed, in this sense and applied to rational realities nowadays, Plato's answers can still work.

1) Plato seems…

Cite this Document:

"Knowledge Is Not Sense-Perception Plato Relies In" (2005, January 30) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/knowledge-is-not-sense-perception-plato-61440

"Knowledge Is Not Sense-Perception Plato Relies In" 30 January 2005. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/knowledge-is-not-sense-perception-plato-61440>

"Knowledge Is Not Sense-Perception Plato Relies In", 30 January 2005, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/knowledge-is-not-sense-perception-plato-61440

Related Documents
Plato and Aristotle
PAGES 4 WORDS 1518

Plato and Aristotle Metaphysics The idea of metaphysics is a complex idea that focuses on expanding beyond the mere realities of physics within the natural world. In a sense, this goes "beyond physics," in that the study of metaphysics is "devoted to matters that transcend the mundane concerns" expounded by those of practical scientists such as Einstein and Heisenberg (van Inwagen, Peter). So in a broad term, "metaphysics" attempts to delve deeply

Plato and Socrates -- Human Soul There are a number of philosophical tenets that have been the subject of intense scrutiny since humans coalesced into formal societies. Who are we as a species? Where do we fit in with the universe? What is morality? Do the ends justify the means? Moreover, most of all, why are we here and are we free to act as individuals toward greater good? Free will,

" He also confirmed to himself that God was the origin of his thought, and therefore because his thoughts were real, God must also be real. 3. Descartes -- Senses and Knowledge When we went outside as a class, part of Descartes ideas was visible in our observations. All the students had a different perception of the external world. Some focused on certain people and certain objects, which were not seen in

Soul and Body in Plato
PAGES 7 WORDS 2790

In other words, like Plato, the body is inferior and its substance is irrelevant for true and certain knowledge. The intellect with its faculties (judgment, imagination, memory, free will, etc.) is most important. The sixth meditation is the crucial one. He shows the body as "an extended, non-thinking thing" (VII: 78). This is accepted as being close to who he is, but not as close as the mind part. "And

People sometimes behave irrationally because of their emotional feelings. A perfect example in this case would be love relationships. Why do people involved in love relationships behave sometimes strangely? Why do they keep changing their minds? Why do such people do things they once said they would have never done? Why do these people keep repeating their "mistakes" over and over? And finally, why do these people sometimes seem

Metaphysics presumes some kind of perfection somewhere, but there is no reason to presume this. Further, it presumes free will in the capacity to strive for the ideal. But Nietzsche writes, "Becoming is robbed of its innocence when any particular condition of things is traced to a will, to intentions and to responsible actions" (p. 31). People exist from fate. There is no ideal happiness or morality. There is