Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
The painting captures a very specific kind of aristocratic pastoral leisure, and it accomplishes this by insinuating a number of activities without actually showing them. Firstly, while Mr. Andrews holds his gun, he does so comfortably as he leans against a bench, seemingly indifferent to the prospect of hunting. Mrs. Andrews holds a quill, but she is not paying attention to whatever she might be writing, instead choosing to glance up at the reader. The wheat and penned animals insinuate the work of a farm, but the wheat has already been collected, thus further imbuing the image with a sense of relaxation and leisure. Because it is first and foremost a portrait, the painting serves to portray its main characters as hardworking yet not at all focused on the work itself, but rather the enjoyment that comes from its completion. Furthermore, the characters' relationship with nature is a complex one, because although the trappings of a farm and the suppliant dog demonstrate a kind of mastery over nature, the large clouds and extensive countryside in the background insinuate that nature nonetheless remains untamed and infinite (which, it might be said, is where the beauty comes from).
In fact, the curves of bench feet, which mimic the exposed roots of the tree, seem to demonstrate a desire to mirror nature through human production, such that the relationship between humanity and nature is not portrayed as oppositional, but rather complementary. Thus, Mr. And Mrs. Andrews are so content precisely because they have managed to seamlessly blend into the scene, so that although the humans are necessarily the focus of the image, taken as a whole the painting seems to suggest that contentment comes from acknowledging one's position in the context of the larger world.
Of course, this helps to serve an ideological purpose as well, because it makes the case that Mr. And Mrs. Andrews' clearly comfortable lifestyle is the result of some natural force, and not due to the inevitable exploitation of others (perhaps the laborers responsible for collecting the wheat in the first place). By replacing poor shepherds or farmers in a pastoral scene with aristocracy, the painting helps to soften the fact that these people represent the ruling elite, living comfortably at a time when countless others were barely scraping by. Considering this aspect of the painting, one is able to see how the inclusion of Mr. Andrews' gun and the detail of his muscles serves to demonstrate some portion of that social and political power, even beyond the somewhat more fundamental trick of giving a male character a large phallic object so powerful that it can actually kill things. The gun, after all, is passing in between Mr. Andrews' legs, and although the dog is looking up, his nose seems to be eagerly investigating his master's weapon. To complete this almost comical image of male potency, one may note the two sacks hanging from Mr. Andrews' waist. Thus, while the painting is undoubtedly a celebration of nature and its tranquility, it nonetheless cannot hide the fact that it is first and foremost an exercise in aristocratic vanity.
One can quite easily see how Mr. And Mrs. Andrews might be aesthetically pleasing, because each of the various textures, including the fabric, the bark of the tree, the wheat, the grass, and the clouds are made up of fractals, increasing in detail as the viewer examines them more closely. Thus, from a purely biological perspective, the image succeeds in portraying those visual features which human beings find most interesting, due to the fact that these same fractal patterns are seen in nature. Aside from this, the emotional response initiated by this peaceful scene helps to foment a sense of contemplation in the viewer, inviting further examination in a subtle, persuasive fashion (as opposed to something with a more violent or aggressive content, which invites examination by shocking or otherwise startling the viewer). Furthermore, the smooth lines and soft colors sooth the eye, such that one may travel through the image with quite the same sense of leisure demonstrated by Mr. And Mrs. Andrews. Once again, however, all of this serves to mask the underlying fact that this image is of a highly privileged class and produced at the request of people from that class, so, like all art commissioned in the service of the powerful, one must be careful not to be taken in by the comfortable lie supported by the painting. In this way, any reasonable critical viewer must temper his or her experience of this visually pleasing image with an understanding that this pleasure implicitly serves (or at least, served) to reinforce and justify an ethically unacceptable economic and social system. Of course, this realization need not inhibit one's appreciation of the image as such, but rather augment it such that the painting might be considered on its own terms as well as an artifact in the service of a larger social construct. Finally, one may at least temper any disgust with the social conditions that helped to produce this image by noting that its current home in the London National Gallery actually helps to subvert its aristocratic origins, considering that anyone wishing to see Mr. And Mrs. Andrews in person may do so for free.
"Thomas Gainsborough." The National Gallery of Art. National Gallery of Art, 2011. Web. 28
"Mr. And Mrs. Andrews ." Photograph.Wikipedia.org.…[continue]
"Mr And Mrs Andrews By" (2011, September 30) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/mr-and-mrs-andrews-by-45939
"Mr And Mrs Andrews By" 30 September 2011. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/mr-and-mrs-andrews-by-45939>
"Mr And Mrs Andrews By", 30 September 2011, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/mr-and-mrs-andrews-by-45939
Henry Fielding's Joseph Andrews The protagonists of Henry Fielding's novels would appear to be marked by their extreme social mobility: Shamela will manage to marry her master, Booby, and the "foundling" Tom Jones is revealed as the bastard child of a serving-maid and Squire Allworthy himself, just as surely as Joseph Andrews is revealed to be the kidnapped son of Wilson, who himself was "born a gentleman" (Fielding 157). In fact
Henry James Scheiber, Andrew J. Embedded Narratives of Science and Culture in James's 'Daisy Miller'. College Literature 21.2 (1994): 75-88. In this article, Andrew Scheiber explores the scientific concepts that lie in the social relationship of the story's characters. Scheiber, perhaps, found that a discussion of this would be appropriate to enable the reader of the novella understand the rationales behind the differences between the story's characters in terms of social relationship. Scheiber
Reynolds and I have been described as exact opposites. I seek to learn my trade by my own hand not at some pretense to any system that is better than nature herself. Reynolds on the other hand seeks to understand art by some compass that is supposed to refine his hand and eye. He is also much keener on watching and learning from other men of letters and this
Slavery Art Robert, Calvin, Martha, and William Scott and Mila ended up in the Fine Arts Museum of San Francisco because its owner, Rev. William Anderson Scott, was the minister at Calvary Presbyterian Church there in 1853-61. He was originally from the South and because of his sympathy for the Confederate cause in the Civil War, including offering public prayers for Jefferson Davis, he "had to leave the city for his
Jon Benet Ramsey The Murder and Subsequent Investigation of a Six-Year-old Beauty Queen (Due Date with Month, Day, Year) JonBenet Ramsey The murder of child beauty pageant winner JonBenet Ramsey in Boulder, Colorado has not yet been solved despite years of investigation on local, state, and even federal levels (Allen 2010). The six-year-old child's murder has never been forgotten. She has spurned debates over child abuse, the sexualization of minors, of the impropriety of
Virginia Wolf and "To the Lighthouse" Biographical Information Virginia Woolf is noted as one of the most influential female novelists of the twentieth century. She is often correlated to the American writer Willa Cather not because they were raised similarly or for any other reason than the style of their writing and their early feminist approach to the craft. Woolf, unlike Cather, was born to privilege, and was "ideally situated to appreciate
Virginia Woolf to the Light House Biography of the author Virginia Woolf, the British author who made efforts towards making an original contribution to the structure of the novel, was an eminent writer of feminist essays, a critic writer in The Times Lierary Supplement and the prominent person in the Bloomsbury group. Virginia Woolf was born as the daughter of Sir Leslie Stephen and Julia Jackson Duckworth in London. Her father, Sir