Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
First of all, the U.S. should "actively deter nations from "aspiring to a larger regional or global role." Second of all, preemptive force should be used to prevent countries from developing weapons of mass destruction and, third of all, the United States should "act alone if necessary." Clearly, all of these correlated ideas have been implementing in Iraq. Further more, all of ideas would be laid out in the founding statement of principles for the Project of the New American Century.
Evaluating what exactly the neoconservatives that have are now in the highest positions of the U.S. administration is a difficult and dangers job. Consternating the need for an objective evaluation, it is best to present all points-of-view. The least radical of these seems to be the one referring to its goal to promote the United States towards global leadership.
On the other hand, less moderate approaches see the Project for the New American Century as designed to develop the appropriate measures that will mean "securing U.S. global domination for decades to come." The defense for such a statement comes from the members of the Project themselves, many of these in highest positions available (Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Armitage): "United States is the world's only superpower, combining preeminent military power, global technological leadership, and the world's largest economy (...) America's grand strategy should aim to preserve and extend this advantageous position as far into the future as possible."
The neoconservatives and their plans can only be objectively evaluated by using the statements that they have actually made rather than the evaluations of political analysts. The Project for the New American Century has made these statements and Paul Wolfowitz is one of its leading members. These are facts that cannot be actually contested.
In this entire picture, Iraq appears but a small and insignificant part of the wider neoconservative action plans. The preemptive strike and unilateral action principles allow for foreign intervention according to the military strategy and foreign policy objective that the right wing politicians in Washington have decided upon. The connection between the Project for the New American Century and the applied U.S. policies is made by those that are both members of the former and leaders in the Washington administration. Paul Wolfowitz is one of them.
This is in no way directed at shadowing his merits as a clairvoyant, given the assertions he had made in 1979 related to Iraqi danger in the Persian Gulf region. However, someone who was member of the Washington Administration and part of the Department of Defense would have known this better than anybody else, because he would have been aware of the unbalanced military aid that the United States had been giving the Baghdad authorities and the backing of Saddam's regime. All of these were obviously based on the theory that a controlled dictatorship is better than a loose democracy.
1. Shank, Duane. September 2003. The project for a New American Empire. On the Internet at http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?action=magazine.article&issue=soj0309&article=030911
2. Paul Wolfowitz - Highlights and Quotes. On the Internet at http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/wolfowitz/wolfowitz.php
3. Project for the New American Century. On the Internet at http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/pnac.php
4. Harnden, Toby. March 2003. America's Dream for a New Middle East. News Telegraph. On the Internet at http://www.expat.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/03/18/wiplan18.xml
5. Noah, Timothy. March 2004. Wolfowitz's Overconfidence. A theory about why he was wrong about Iraq. On the Internet at http://slate.msn.com/id/2097963
6. Shorrock, Tim. Asian Fantasies-Paul Wolfowitz's Makeover in the Times.
7. Profile: Paul Wolfowitz. BBC News. World Edition. On the Internet at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1564448.stm
8. Paul Wolfowitz - Deputy Secretary of Defense. United States Department of Defense. On the Internet at http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/depsecdef_bio.html
Profile: Paul Wolfowitz. BBC News. World Edition. On the Internet at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1564448.stm
Paul Wolfowitz - Deputy Secretary of Defense. United States Department of Defense. On the Internet at http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/depsecdef_bio.html
Shorrock, Tim. Asian Fantasies-Paul Wolfowitz's Makeover in the Times.
Noah, Timothy. March 2004. Wolfowitz's Overconfidence. A theory about why he was wrong about Iraq. On the Internet at http://slate.msn.com/id/2097963
Harnden, Toby. March 2003. America's Dream for a New Middle East. News Telegraph. On the Internet at http://www.expat.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/03/18/wiplan18.xml
Project for the New American Century. On the Internet at http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/pnac.php
Paul Wolfowitz - Highlights and Quotes. On the Internet at http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/wolfowitz/wolfowitz.php
Shank, Duane. September 2003. The project for a New American Empire. On the Internet at http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?action=magazine.article&issue=soj0309&article=030911[continue]
"Paul Wolfowitz Considered By Many" (2005, March 22) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/paul-wolfowitz-considered-by-many-63311
"Paul Wolfowitz Considered By Many" 22 March 2005. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/paul-wolfowitz-considered-by-many-63311>
"Paul Wolfowitz Considered By Many", 22 March 2005, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/paul-wolfowitz-considered-by-many-63311
The Church Committee concluded that these activities made the intelligence community a secret government that was illegal, unethical, and improper and did not reflect the people or the nation of America. Secret intelligence actions were used to disrupt, harass, and destroy domestic law-abiding citizens and groups. At the time, people were spied on with excessive intrusion with the methods being illegal. In addition, the intelligence agencies carried out secret infiltration
Strike before being struck is the rallying cry of this form of foreign policy and Kaplan and Kristol would be in complete agreement. Secondly, the alleged harboring of the Al-Quaeda, the terrorist organization responsible for the 9/11 bombings, provided an additional justification which was also in line with the preemptive argument offered by Kaplan and Kristol. The Al-Quaeda were, according to the thinking of these two writers and the
Quoted in "Strengthen Alliances..." Chapter III of "NSS" paper) Not long after the unveiling of the Bush doctrine vide the NSS, the United States demonstrated its practical application by taking unilateral military action against Iraq despite opposition from most of its key allies and not having a specific UN Resolution to do so. US Hegemony: Another key feature of the Bush doctrine that appeared in the NSS was that the United States
Iraq War In 2003 the United States President George W. Bush officially declared war on Iraq to depose Saddam Hussein from power. The rationale given by the Bush Administration to justify the invasion of Iraq was manifold. The U.S. Government accused the Iraqi regime of possessing and developing weapons of mass destruction. In numerous statements, the Bush Administration officials also accused Saddam Hussein of harboring terrorists, including members of Al-Qaeda.
invasion and occupation of Iraq from three different perspectives. Firstly, the paper provides a historical background pertaining to the interest of energy-hungry countries such as France, America and Britain. The paper also provides a brief background of the relationship of Iraq with its neighbors and how oil has turned out to be a major source of attraction for the imperial powers. Secondly, the paper provides an in-depth perspective of
S. It is now the Germans, the British, the Italians, the Swedes, and all of the European Union." Over the last fifty years the American foreign policy has been characterized by "liberal internationalism and globalism" During the period between 1781, which was the beginning of the confederation through the year 1941 the country was equal in unilateralist and isolationist in theoretical framework of international affairs. However in 1941 at the time Pearl
His philosophy of a ruler who used any means necessary to achieve his goals is not too far off from what Bush has done in the war in Iraq. Bush has misled the public; whether he did this deliberately or not is still up for debate but the result of his misleading behavior has been financial and political gain for him and his cronies. Vice President Cheney has made