Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … temptation of the uneducated to believe that psychology and other philosophical sciences involve no more than common sense and logical thinking. While these are certainly part of psychology, the profession is also a science. This means that the scientific study of phenomena is involved, and conclusions are drawn based on the results. Psychology as a direction of study therefore involves much more than only common sense.
According to Bluedorn (2005), logic can be explained by two methods of reasoning: inductive and deductive reasoning. Reasoning can run in two opposite directions. Deductive reasoning moves from a general premise to a more specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning moves from specific premises to a general conclusion. These two methods of reasoning will produce two different kinds of results. Inductive reasoning uses as its basis particular observations from which it derives a general conclusion. The limit to this form of reasoning is that the observations used are seldom exhaustive and therefore not completely reliable.
Psychology as a scientific direction of research has very specific goals: description, prediction, causal control, and explanation (Norton, 2003-2005). While it is clear that logical reasoning is part of these elements, there is a further element to this research. Empirical psychological research entails gathering data and analyzing it to either prove or disprove a hypothesis. Common sense relies only on reasoning. Psychological research relies on the possibility of proof and the consequences of this proof. Types of psychological research include
Experiments, correlational designs, and descriptive studies. Common sense plays a role in all three types of study, although this is not the only determinant for conclusions. Reasoning probably plays the largest part in the descriptive study of psychological behavior.
It can therefore be stated that common sense is definitely a dimension of psychological study. One should however also recognize psychology as an empirical science.
Sources
Bluedorn, Harvey (2005). An Introduction to Inductive and Deductive Logic http://www.triviumpursuit.com/articles/two_methods_of_reasoning.htm
Davis, John (1997, May). Psychological Research Methods. Department of Psychology,
Metropolitan State College of Denver. http://clem.mscd.edu/~davisj/prm2/comments.html
W.W. Norton & Company. (2003-2005). Psychological Research. http://www.wwnorton.com/psychsci/ch2_overview.htm
Nonetheless, an argument from common sense can be made based on our own observational context. For example, neurologically speaking, there is a wealth of evidence to illustrate that genes have an immense impact on the final structure of the brain, and thus on behavior. Schizophrenia is an obvious example of this. Logically, though, there is also abundant support for Dawkins' thesis. Roughly, an argument can be shown to be logically
Psychology Theories of personality focus on inner traits of individuals, which may or may not be viewed as static. The most important schools of personality psychology include Psychodynamic Theory, Freud's Theory of Personality, Humanistic Theory, B.F. Skinner's Theory of Personality, Social Learning Theory, and Evolutionary Personality Theory. While all these theories share in common their goal to explain, analyze, and understand human behavior in terms of personality explanations, there are important
Self-Concept is what one believes about themselves. These beliefs stem from the notion of unconditional positive regard and conditional positive regard. Unconditional positive regard takes place when individuals, especially parents, demonstrate unconditional love. Conditioned positive regard is when that love seems to only come when certain conditions are met. Rogers's theory states that psychologically healthy people enjoy life to the fullest and thus they are seen as fully functioning
In their book, Progress in Modern Psychology: The Legacy of American Functionalism, Owens and Wagner (1992) suggest that contemporary psychology reflects a common vision of the naturalistic framework that was first inspired by William James and later refined by John Dewey, James Rowland Angell, Harvey Carr, among others. In this regard, Owens and Wagner argue that one of the key contributors to early functionalism was John Dewey. In sharp
Psychology of Happiness and a Life Well-Lived In this paper, I have discussed that happiness as well as morality (meaningful purpose) are actually the ultimate goals and the true sign of a life well-lived. I have tried to explain how morality must be considered as the most important factor to signify a well-lived life. I have also given the ideas of Aristotle and Plato regarding morality and happiness and have tried
Psychology of Happiness Analysis of "Flow: The psychology of optimal experience" by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi In the book, "Flow: the psychology of optimal experience," author Mihaly Cszikszentmihalyi offers an alternative perspective in which to view how people have re-defined the concept of happiness and changed it according to the experiences of people at present. Now that we have a relatively higher level of comfort and ease in life, we have changed the way