Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Reality and Knowledge
Epistemology (the study of knowledge) has occupied philosophers and laypeople alike for as long as human beings have had a conception of reality and knowledge. Many philosophers, beginning with Plato, have argued that reality and knowledge are essentially abstract concepts. Aristotle argued, in contrast that knowledge and reality must be based on the senses and inductive reasoning, while Hume argued that our understanding of reality and causation is fundamentally flawed, and that skepticism was the only workable way to knowledge of the world and the internal self. The philosopher George Berkeley presented what is perhaps the most extreme argument against an Aristotelian view of reality in arguing that the material world does not exist, and that objects are simply made of up ideas. While Berkeley's view of reality as based solely upon the mind is extreme and somewhat tenuous, Hume's understanding of the limitations causality and human understanding seems to have real merit. Essentially, we cannot totally rely on our five senses to gain knowledge of the external world.
All men by nature desire to know," writes Aristotle in his Metaphysics. It is this desire that has driven humankind to attempt to understand the basis of our knowledge about ourselves and the world about us. This desire likely began as soon as human self-insight developed, and has continued to the present day, as movies like the Matrix challenge our conceptions about reality and truth. Great philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, David Hume, and George Berkeley have made important contributions to this study of knowledge and reality. This paper will examine the insights of these philosophers, and their diverse understandings about the limitations of human knowledge and the external and internal world.
Plato, born in 428-7 B.C.E, was perhaps the earliest philosopher in the Western tradition to contemplate the nature of reality. He developed the theory of forms or ideas as the basis of human reality. To Plato, the world that perceive through our senses is only "an imitation of the pure, eternal, and unchanging world of the Forms" (The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Plato). To Plato, the idea or form of beauty can only be approximated by human knowlege of beauty. For example, a beautiful rose, person, sunset, poem, or song is only an approximation of the true idea or form of beauty itself. No matter how seemingly perfect, each of these cannot quite match the form of beauty, which is perfect beauty. The concept of forms extends to concepts like equality, justice, great and small, and even objects like a bed. Essentially, to Plato, the best human knowledge that we can hope for is our best approximation of true nature, or form. Reality in essence remains hidden from us, and we simply see representations of forms in our everyday experience.
In contrast, Plato's student Aristotle (born 384 B.C.), disagreed with Plato's assertion that the world could only be known in the abstract. Instead, "Aristotle believed that the world could be understood at a fundamental level through the detailed observation and cataloging of phenomenon" (Hooker). It is Aristotle's understanding that we can gain knowledge through empirical observation that is reflected so completely in the modern world's embrace of the scientific method. He relied heavily on the technique of inductive reasoning, where he studied a multitude of examples and then tried to derive fundamental rules and concepts from these studies (Hooker).
For Aristotle, knowledge could be classified into different objects of knowledge, and the relative certainty of knowing these objects. Objects like mathematics allow for a knowledge that is certain all of the time (two plus two always equal four), while other types of knowledge cannot be certain (such as human behavior). Ethics, politics, and psychology are also categorized as this type of uncertain knowledge.
For Plato, change in the world could be understood as variations on imperfect representations of forms and ideas that were constant and unchangeable. However, to Aristotle, the visible world represented reality, and to explain change Aristotle had to describe principles that would explain change. For Aristotle, reality and knowledge were based upon an understanding of the root causes of change. In his thinking, there are four basic causes of change and motion in the universe. These are: 1) the material, 2) the formal, 3)…[continue]
"Reality And Knowledge" (2004, May 25) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/reality-and-knowledge-170515
"Reality And Knowledge" 25 May 2004. Web.25 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/reality-and-knowledge-170515>
"Reality And Knowledge", 25 May 2004, Accessed.25 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/reality-and-knowledge-170515
Reality Television: A Media Psychological Literature Review Media Psychology The research will examine and study aspects of reality television programming from a media psychological perspective and with media psychological methods. The following literature review serves as a context within which the reader and the research will consider the topics. The aim is to outline current and relevant knowledge of the affects of psychological affects of reality television program upon viewers/consumers. Through the
Seeking to strip his conception of knowledge to the bare minimum by removing all notions which can subject to reasonable doubt, Descartes differentiates between assumptions and true knowledge because, in his estimation, any perception based solely on sensory input is inevitably flawed, as the human sensory system is known to be fallible (Collingwood). By rejecting the role of assumptions in forming knowledge, Descartes devises perhaps the most well recognized
The therapist, who withholds judgment and criticism, ceases to be perceived in the mind of the prisoner like an adjunct of the guard or police, but as a facilitator of positive changes in the lives of the prisoners (p. 102). Correctional practitioners often speak of "getting back to basics." Reality Therapy and Choice Theory, which is an excellent tool for either classroom or self-study, is about just that. In the
(Das; Puri, 2003) Innovation Management systems are also able to generate structured processes for evaluation and sharing ideas, such that decision makers are able to target those who possess the maximum potential. Nevertheless from the perspective of a manufacturing industry, the two costs which are important are material cost and processing costs which together accounts for 60% to 70% of the cost of goods sold. Material cost reduction in this
Knowledge Is Not Sense-Perception Plato relies in debating the true nature of knowledge in the same manner as his tutor, Socrates, assuming and arguing that knowledge was not only about the perception of our senses, as many pf the Ancient philosophers sustained. In this sense, in his work Theaetetus, Plato argues that knowledge can be objective, debating the nature and problems of knowledge. Attacking Protagoras's belief that "man is the measure of
Then, a fourth reason is that reality shows can sometimes reveal situations of success, which in turn inspire and motivate the audiences to change their lives for the better. Examples of such shows include Dr. 90210, in which plastic surgeons operate on patients, change their appearance and as such increase their self-esteem, or the several shows revealing people fighting, and beating, obesity (Goodman). These types of reality shows set the
All in all, Business Intelligence allows the company to better analyze the myriad of forces in the micro and macro environment and to make better informed decisions. It as such supports analytics, which in turn creates competitive advantages for the economic agent (Davenport, 2006), but it also creates internal strength and stability in the face of external pressures; it supports the processes of decision making. Still, regardless of the benefits of