Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
What are the signs that a website has credibility and value to the researcher? What specific information in a website's presentation lets the researcher know that this information is valid and verified? This portion of the paper explores the way in which websites are best evaluated and tested for validity.
Website Review and Evaluation
When a researcher goes to Google and types in "evaluating website checklist," Google reports (in less than 2 seconds) that there are "About 760,000 results," or links, to sites that relate to that topic. Anyone that has used Google knows full well that all 760,000 of those links are not necessarily useful; and indeed there are bound to be repeat links among the 760,000 sites.
The shortest criterion for evaluating websites was put online by Avon Public Schools in Connecticut. There are eight ways to check information on websites (note: some schools spell it "web site" and others use "website" (still others capitalize "Website"). The eight from Avon schools include: a) "it is clear who has written the information?"; b) are the "aims" of the site clearly established?; c) does the site "achieve" those aims? d) it is relevant to my needs? e) can the information be verified? f) how old is the site?; g) is the information biased?; and h) does the site offer choices? (www.avon.k12.ct.us).
The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) is far more thorough, and offers five key criteria. The first is "credibility" (is the author listed, what are his or her credentials, can the author be reached for comment, is it peer-reviewed and is the spelling / grammar proper? Under "Accuracy" UIUC asks: is the site current, is the information complete and does the author "…acknowledge all views?" The site included "reasonableness" (fairness, truthfulness), "support" (backup and sources listed), and "design and technology" (how it looks and do links work?). The University of California at Berkeley has some interesting criteria for evaluation; for example, "Why was the page put on the Web?" is a very germane question. Is it intended as "satire or parody?" Or is it "appropriate" for the research a student is engaged in? Is it "second hand information" and are there valid links to "more resources"? The most poignant sub-head in the Berkeley list is, "Does it all add up?"
The University of Southern Maine (USM) covers most of the issues other sites cover, but USM does have some original ideas for checking the credibility of websites. For example, "Is the material at this site useful, unique, accurate, or is it derivative, repetitious, or doubtful?" Also, USM asks: a) how frequently is the resource updated? b) Does the resource have a reputable organization or expert behind it? c) Is the information available in other formats? d) Is the information available in other formats? And e) Is the arrangement of links uncluttered? (USM).
The University of Maryland actually has a checklist in the form of a survey. The students print out the survey and check in the boxes that apply. The author points out that one should not necessarily be immediately impressed with a website because "Anyone who knows a little HTML coding and has access to a server can create and load a web page." Under the subhead "What is the purpose of the web page or site?" there are 8 boxes provided. Any website would fall under one of the 8 categories, a few of which include: "A forum for scholarly research"; "For entertainment"; and "An advertisement or electronic commerce." Under the subhead "What does the web site provide?" one of the boxes can be checked if the user "…couldn't tell."
One of the important rules of thumb is for the user to know roughly when the site was last updated or revised. The University of Maryland checklist points out that some websites that relate to historical events don't need updating as often as more current information, but still, checking the validity of any website is vital in order to be certain of accuracy and thoroughness.
Two Websites that address The Underground Railroad
Checking for websites that provide information for the Underground Railroad, a researcher uses Google and 6,730,000 links come up in 0.35 seconds. The first two appear to be of good quality -- National Geographic and Public Broadcast Service (PBS). But the…[continue]
"Underground Railroad" (2013, February 28) Retrieved December 11, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/underground-railroad-103606
"Underground Railroad" 28 February 2013. Web.11 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/underground-railroad-103606>
"Underground Railroad", 28 February 2013, Accessed.11 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/underground-railroad-103606
The Underground Railroad was an informal network of aide and assistance for those who would escape the bondage of slavery and seek freedom. Besides the Underground Railroad made famous by American History, other such systems have offered similar services. Until all persons in the world are free, Underground Railroads will operate in order to bring freedom and liberty to all human beings. Anyone who as read Anne Frank's diary knows that
Underground railroad, harriet tubman involved underground railroad. history underground railroad state Indiana (Terre Haute). A Run through the Underground Railroad Slavery is one of the most important issues that helped shape American cultural identity, and, throughout time, there have been many famous people who helped slaves escape the terror in the South and reach Free states in the North of the United States of America or even in Canada. Everything started at the
Civil War Women Harriet Tubman: Conductor, Nurse, Cook, Spy, and Scout Harriet Ross Tubman Davis (c. 1822 -- 1913) was best known for her role as a conductor on the Underground Railroad prior to and during the American Civil War (Sernett 22). What many people may not realize is that she was actively involved in the war effort as a Union nurse, cook, spy, and scout (Sernett 75). A remarkable woman in
D.). Therefore, the strength of his convictions and the acceptance of sacrifice create indeed a vivid impression of the character. Moreover, he openly admits the challenges facing his business and his ability to support his family, yet "yet my faith was not shaken, nor my efforts for the slaves lessened"(Coffin, n.d.). The power the belief in a higher authority that offered the blessing on the affairs he conducted represented the
Bloss, a Christian evangelist and labor activist who published a newspaper titled "Rights of Man" (Kaye, p. 147). Were there others whose names are not well-known but who played an important role in the abolitionist movement? According to author Harvey J. Kaye, the co-editor of "Freedom's Journal" was an African-American named Samuel Cornish. Kaye writes (p. 147) that Cornish also launched his own abolitionist newspaper, "The Rights of All." Another
Tubman was not a pure pacifist, despite her devout belief in God. She carried a pistol as well as prayed on her journeys and was a friend of John Brown, the legendary White armed rebel of Harper's Ferry. He called her General Tubman. "When the Civil War began, Tubman prophetically stated that it would end slavery, much to the disbelief of her abolitionist friends. General Tubman, who in a sense
African-American Studies Chapters 9-12 Discuss the myths and realities of the Underground Railroad. There are a number of myths associated with the Underground Railroad. One such myth was about the use of coded quilts which has been discredited by scholarly research. Another myth concerns the number of slaves who were conducted to freedom by way of the Underground Railroad. Precise numbers are just unknown because of the secrecy required for successful operation.