Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
The War on Drugs was likely bad public policy from the beginning. It was an over-reaction to what politicians believed was a major social problem. The major social problem was society's method of dealing with the perceived problem and not the actual problem of drug use. Through the Controlled Substance Act Congress created a whole new class of criminal and a black market industry that makes the bootlegging of the 1930's look amateur in comparison.
Drug abuse is a problem just like alcoholism is a problem. Prohibiting the sale of alcohol did nothing to affect the rate or treatment of alcoholism and, as history has now shown us, prohibiting the sale of certain drugs has not affected the rate or treatment of drug abuse either. Such treatment is best left to the experts educated to provide such treatment and criminalizing the behavior only serves to make a bad situation worse.
Since 1997 the drug policy of the United States and Canada has been remarkably similar. As already noted, the United States commenced its present drug policy through the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (U.S. Department of Justice). Canada, for a variety of reason including political pressure from the United States, enacted its own version of the Controlled Substances Act in the form of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act in 1997 (Department of Justice Canada) and, in doing so, essentially followed the United States lead in attempting to criminalize behavior that should be more appropriately addressed by mental health professionals. Statistically neither country's drug policy has proven to be successful and, arguably, created more problems than it has resolved.
The same patterns that exhibited themselves in the United States subsequent to its enactment of the Controlled Substances Act have emerged in Canada following their enacting similar legislation in 1997. Despite continuously increasing its yearly budget in order to enforce the provisions of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act drug abuse in Canada remains a problem and continues to show a steady rise. Groups throughout Canada have been critical of the overall drug policy of the Canadian government and have advocated for a change in direction. The direction that they are advocating involves a shifting in focus from aggressive law enforcement in the area of drugs toward one directed at providing treatment and education (National Framework for Action).
The public policy considerations that served to initiate the move toward federal intervention into the area of drug enforcement should be re-examined. Public surveys indicate that the public's attitude toward the use and sale of certain drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, and heroin have changed in the past forty years and it is time that federal legislation be adapted to reflect this change in attitude. The repeal of Prohibition was in reaction to a change in public policy and the repeal of the Controlled Substance Act would reflect a reaction to another change in public policy (Huffington). It would restore the responsibility of drug enforcement to the states where it is more properly placed and free federal funds for other purposes. Our federal prisons will become more manageable and the tax dollars that are being used to maintain the large numbers convicted under drug statutes can be transferred to pay for other government responsibilities. In the end, America will be a better society where so many of its young people are not being characterized as criminals but as individuals with a dependency that requires treatment. Much like the alcoholics of the 1930's who were jailed for being drunks; today's drug abusers are being imprisoned for being dependent on drugs. Legalizing the sale of these drugs will free them from being deemed criminals and allow them to be viewed as they truly are: individuals with a dependent personality. Congress having the good judgment to exercise its discretion in this area would reflect prevailing public policy and not the archaic views of society forty years ago.
Through two failed programs, the United States and Canada have both learned that the criminal law is not the proper method for addressing problems regarding drug abuse (Oscapella). Adopting such a policy does not address the fundamental question which is why do people use drugs? Prohibiting the use of drugs and alcohol through criminalizing such behavior did not work in the 1930s and still does not work. In Canada there is at least some considerable movement to abandon law enforcement as a method of addressing the drug abuse problem but in the United States the war on drugs remains a popular rallying call for many politicians and any real change is still in the future. Despite, overwhelming evidence that the use of the criminal law as a method of controlling drug abuse does not work there is no indication that the policy will be abandoned.
Drug Enforcement Admininstration. U.S. Drug Enforcement Admininstration. 1999. 18 May 2011
Encylopedia Brittannica. "Prohibition." 2011. Encylopedia Britannica. 18 May 2011
Frone, Kristin E. Voelkl and Michael R. "Predictors of substance abuse at school among high school students." Journal of Educational Psychology (2000): 583-592.
Global Commission on Drug Policy. War on Drugs. Research. Rio de Janiero: Global Commission on Drugs, 2011.
National Cancer Society. Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.
National Institute of Justice. Annual Report on Drug Use Among Adult and Juvenile Arrestees. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, 2009.
Suddath, Claire. "The War on Drugs." Time Magazine 25 March 2009.
Webb, Jim. A Time to Fight: Reclaiming a Fair and Just America. New York: Broadway, 2009.
White House Office…[continue]
The Supreme Court is the most powerful body of men in the United States, contrary to what many people believe. The powers of the three branches of government are enumerated in the three charters of freedom: The Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. Together, these documents enumerate the rights and freedoms of the citizens of the United States, inherent by virtue of their
Environmental Ethics & United States Government Environmental Ethics and United States [Type the document title] Definition of Environment Ethics & Its Approaches United States & Environmental Ethics Role of United States Government Environment Protection Agency Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Park Service (NPS) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Role of Civil Society in Environment Protection & Preservation Environment protection and preservation has been a serious concern for countries all across the globe. But the government of
4 trillion and $3.6 trillion, an impressive boost to the U.S. economy in those years, the IPC explains. A study conducted by Arizona State University determined that when a person has a bachelor's degree that person earns about $750,000 more over the course of a lifetime of earning than a person with just a high school diploma earns. The data from that study indicates that as of 2006, those working without
Environmental Ethics US Government and Environmental Ethics The United States government has had a long history with the environment, beginning with the very beginning of the settlement of the Pilgrims, through the industrialization era, forming the beginning principles of having national parks, and to today with the onset of climate change and the environmental hazards of the 21st century. (National Park Service, 2012) Compared to other countries, the U.S. has had a
1990, United States government passed the Hate Crimes Statistics Act. This mandated that state, local and federal law enforcement agencies report data on crimes that reflected a bias against a person's race, religion, sexual orientation, and/or ethnicity/national origin. Several years later, people with disabilities were added to this list. Data collection was placed under the auger of the FBI, which complied by publishing an annual report through its Uniform
awarding audit contracts by U.S. government departments and agencies Audit Management Red Rationale for and Objectives of the project main and secondary Desktop or literature search Rationale for Search Methodology LITERATURE/DESKTOP RESEARCH Authoritative sources Desktop Findings Justification for audits Evolving role of auditors Types of audit contracts Understanding the Audit Process Best practices and benchmarking Terminology Case Studies Audit management is a fundamental element in government accountability, control and performance management. Certainly there is justification within the Federal government to conduct audits of contracts for the
United States has become preoccupied with the internal affairs at the expense of the foreign affairs after the civil war. It started interfering in overseas conflicts and interacting with the World after the diplomatic inactivity from Latin America and Spain to the China and Philippines. This interaction made the America to become a major World power. The first conflict of America was with the Hawaii in Pacific which was governed by
"United States Government Has Been" (2011, November 14) Retrieved October 20, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/united-states-government-has-been-47509
"United States Government Has Been" 14 November 2011. Web.20 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/united-states-government-has-been-47509>
"United States Government Has Been", 14 November 2011, Accessed.20 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/united-states-government-has-been-47509