23 Things They Dont Tell You About Capitalism Book Review

PAGES
2
WORDS
621
Cite

Introduction to Economics and Global Capitalism The book 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism is a very captivating and thought provoking read that purposes to provide the reader with some fundamental truths regarding capitalism that may not be easily perceptible or known. This is information regarding capitalism that most people would overlook and hardly take them into consideration in an extensive manner. However, there are a number of things from the list that I was unaware of and gained insight from the information contained in the book. One of the key surprising aspects was Thing 4 that delineated that the washing machine has transformed the world more than the internet. This is largely for the reason that we are used to being in awe and fascinated by the spectacles of computing. We consider technological aspects such as the internet and telecommunication advances to be the things that have transformed the world. However, we have a tendency of forgetting that the world we exist in would be severely dissimilar devoid of machines that facilitate conducting household chores. Another surprising argument made by the author is Thing 9, which outlines that we do not exist in a post-industrial age. This is largely for the reason that...

...

Nonetheless, a high level of productivity has instigated such products to become considerably cheaper in comparison to services (Chang, 2012).
Another insightful aspect provided by Chang (2012) is Thing 17 that states that education in itself is not going to make a country richer. In particular, this is a largely discerning chapter that provides a thought provoking way of understanding education. Usually education is considered to be one of the key reasons why developed nations are richer compared to developing nations. More often than not, the graduates coming from university are employed by organizations owing to the extensive knowledge and know-how that they have attained during their academic period. They are usually employed for the reason that they claim to have intelligence, impetus, and also discipline in comparison to individuals that are yet to attend university and those yet to graduate from university. Prior to reading this particular book, I always considered education pivotal for nations becoming richer. This is in the sense that developing nations would benefit from high levels of education to advance their technology,…

Cite this Document:

"23 Things They Dont Tell You About Capitalism" (2018, February 27) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/23-things-they-dont-tell-you-about-capitalism-book-review-2172234

"23 Things They Dont Tell You About Capitalism" 27 February 2018. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/23-things-they-dont-tell-you-about-capitalism-book-review-2172234>

"23 Things They Dont Tell You About Capitalism", 27 February 2018, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/23-things-they-dont-tell-you-about-capitalism-book-review-2172234

Related Documents

This information goes both ways, which is essential for the functioning of the free market. While this information comes and goes in the free market, so does it in the realm of advertising and consumerism. Companies advertise, consumers follow suit with their response, and these companies continue with or adjust their advertising methods to better suit themselves and their consumers. It is this give and take that has made the

Marxian critique of capitalism focuses on the private ownership and control of social means of production -- factories, farms, fisheries, forests, and their accumulated representations, financial capital. Capital is the product of the collective productive efforts of the men and women who do the work in society, and it ought to be controlled by them and put to productive uses that serve their needs and desires. Explain why you agree

It is, in one sense, a give and take relationship, but underlying it are the philosophies of Rousseau and Smith, in spite of the fact that both are full of contradictions. Rousseau, for example, states that man's "first law is to provide for his own preservation, his first cares are those which he owes to himself; and, as soon as he reaches years of discretion, he is the sole

Price Beauty? 'For though beauty is seen and confessed by all, yet, from the many fruitless attempts to account for the cause of its being so, enquiries on this head have almost been given up" William Hogarth, The Analysis of Beauty, (1753) Not very encouraging words, but if the great artist William Hogarth felt himself up to the task, we can attempt at least to follow his lead. That beauty is enigmatic

McLaren and Farahmandpur conceive of the new imperialism as a "combination of old-style military and financial practices as well as recent attempts by developed nations to impose the law of the market on the whole of humanity itself" (2001, 136). McLaren and Farahmandpur note, too, that the concept of class division is a taboo subject within the "guarded precincts of academic discourse, leaving discussions of class out of discussions of global

He also asserts that government participation in the arts beyond its role as a consumer can pose significant hindrances to the artistic processes. He claims that politics tends to "seek stability, compromise, and consensus," and as a result avoids supporting art that may "offend majority opinion or go over its head" (38). The market, on the other hand, has "liberated artists…from the potential tyranny of mainstream market taste" (23). Is