Rand believes such a viewpoint is inherently limiting and contradicts the means by which man survives—by fending for himself (Rand 6).
A fair amount of truth exists in Rand’s concept that the default ethical theory of our society is altruism. This notion is rooted in the longstanding belief that doing things for others is somehow much better than doing something for oneself. In fact, she states that popular conception is that there is a notion of sacrifice which is an integral part of ethical behavior. Sacrificing oneself for others is the core of the idea of altruism.
The specific reason the author contends that the default ethical theory for Western society during the 20th century when she was writing is altruism is because of the way it circumscribes the very field of morality. She posits the notion that altruism is the de facto form of morality because it defines values in regards to who benefits from them. As previously identified, with altruism the beneficiary is always another and never the self. Altruism, then, is responsible for reducing the field of morality simply into a matter of whether or not one is doing something for someone else. If so, one is engaged in ethical actions; if not, one is not engaged in ethical actions.
In this respect, all someone has to do to engage in moral behavior is to do something for someone else. This theory (which Rand discusses but to which she also objects) is extremely encompassing. It does not matter what the actual outcome of something is, so long as the intention was to benefit another it is embraced as altruistic. It is become of the breadth of this philosophy the author terms it a default ethical theory. So many things, such as Hitler’s so-called purging of the Jews to create a master race, fit into this category.
Still the primary problem with this view of altruism in relation to ethics and the reason why Rand refers to it as the default ethics of her day is because it is so broad it all but belies the need to have a true sense of ethics. If all one has to do is claim you authorized an action because it benefits another, one can do almost anything. The danger with this default is that it leaves little room for constructing true principles of morality which are specific, defining, and provide some sort of “moral guidance” (Rand 6). Morality needs more than one principal. If it is limited to solely determining whether or not another gained from an action, there is no need to conceive of other tenets which can affect this sphere of life.…
First, this viewpoint essentially discounts all abstract works from being called "art." This idea seems counterintuitive to many; numerous art critics, collectors, viewers, and even Rand (see below) consider abstract art to be art, based on the metaphysical emotions it re-creates. Rand's Objectivist philosophy does not completely accept emotions as having an existence independent of a subject, and therefore her view on non-representational art is at least consistent with
Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand The Rationalization and Pursuit of Self-interest of Humanity in "The Virtue of Selfishness" by Ayn Rand Ayn Rand's collection of essays in the book "The Virtue of Selfishness" provides insightful thoughts about the emergence of rationalization and individualism within the individual. The author discusses how the dawn of humankind had already seen the emergence of individualism and rationalization. It is only in the process of
Moral Environment Ayn Rand's The Ethics of Emergencies speaks about the value of selfishness or self-interest. Although "selfishness" might seem negative at first, Rand's explanation makes quite a bit of sense. Rand speaks about selfishness as a rational process in which a person sets his/her hierarchy of values and lives according to those values in order to achieve the moral purpose of life: one's own happiness. Summary of The Ethics of Emergencies According
83). Let us go through these arguments. The first argument does not suggest that a person involved in business should disregard any ethical obligations. One can economically survive in business without violating the norms of morality. Moreover, as Beverluis argues, "we are in a real sense 'doing' business ethics. For what is a 'right'? If one puts forward the claim to have certain moral rights (as opposed to legal rights),
Ethical Leadership Given the recent crash on Wall Street and the housing market symbolized by corrupt financiers like Bernard Madoff, ethical and moral leadership of corporations has become a major issue for those who study the American capitalist system. In reality, such concerns about the lack of morality in business, government and society as a while has increased significantly in the last thirty years, which undoubtedly has been an era that