Behaviorism And Neo Behaviorism Approaches Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
734
Cite

Neo-behaviorism and Classical S-R Behaviorism

Behaviorism is regarded as an approach in the field of psychology that emphasizes the significant role of environmental factors in shaping people’s behavior. This approach of psychology emphasizes that environmental factors influence behavior more than intrinsic or genetic factors. Based on this school of thought, all behaviors are influenced by interactions with the environment and therefore focuses on stimulus-response behaviors. The behaviorist movement has attracted several varying perspectives among different psychologists including John Watson’s classical S-R behaviorism. Classical S-R behaviorism is an approach that postulates that all psychological functions can be explained through observable, overt, and measurable muscular movements, nerve impulses, and glandular secretions (Moore, 2011).

However, classical S-R behaviorism has attracted considerable criticism from various psychologists on the premise that it’s insufficient to account for the wide range of human behavior. One of the major criticisms of classical S-R behaviorism is from Edward C. Tolman and Clark Hull. Tolman contended that classical S-R behaviorism does not account for purposive behavior given that most animal and human behavior is deliberately targeted towards a specific goal or end state. While he did not refute the independence of conscious behavior and mentality, Tolman argued that...
...

On the other hand, Hull introduced the concept of operationalism, which suggests that habits exist independently of the specific behavioral expression in stimulus conditions.
Based on Hull and Tolman’s work, neo-behaviorism was the best response to classical S-R behaviorism since they focus on consideration of the whole picture when addressing the issue of human behavior. Neo-behaviorism is the best response to classical S-R behaviorism since is emphasizes that the study of learning and focus on objective methods of observation are crucial to scientific psychology. In this regard, purpose and cognition are critical to behavior and should be interpreted as observable characteristics of behavior rather than mentalistic components. Moreover, human behavior also incorporates habit-formation since people have a tendency to respond to a particular positive stimulus in a certain way.

Skinners’ Radical Behaviorism and Watson’s Classical Behaviorism



One of the psychologists who played a crucial role in the development of the psychological approach to behaviorism is B.F. Skinner. Skinner was one of the most important neo-behaviorists who not only refuted Hull’s efforts to develop formal theory and returned to John Watson’s of developing science based on observation of…

Cite this Document:

"Behaviorism And Neo Behaviorism Approaches" (2017, December 06) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/behaviorism-and-neo-behaviorism-approaches-essay-2168888

"Behaviorism And Neo Behaviorism Approaches" 06 December 2017. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/behaviorism-and-neo-behaviorism-approaches-essay-2168888>

"Behaviorism And Neo Behaviorism Approaches", 06 December 2017, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/behaviorism-and-neo-behaviorism-approaches-essay-2168888

Related Documents

Introduction Few 20th century thinkers were as controversial, or as influential, as Sigmund Freud. Freud’s writings, his contributions to the field of psychology, and his therapeutic techniques have been influential not just in psychology, but in all the social sciences. At the same time, many of Freud’s theories and practices proved problematic or in need of revision. Thus, a cadre of important social science researchers the likes of Adler, Fromm, Jung,

Introduction Psychoanalysis, behaviorism, and humanistic, transpersonal, and existential (HTE) psychology are the three primary movements in the study of the human experience. Each of these movements uses different research methodologies and epistemologies, and each focuses on different aspects of the human experience. Moreover, each of these movements presents unique therapeutic interventions and goals in the field of psychology. With each having contributed tremendously to the social sciences, psychoanalysis, behaviorism, and humanistic

The concepts of behaviorism have been very important and infinitely significant for the psychological treatment and cure of human beings, and have therefore been accepted as the foundation for 'pharmacological therapy'. According to neo-behaviorism, free will, or the idea of a person being completely responsible for his own actions or behaviors, does not exist at all, and this is in complete contrast to the existentialist theory which holds man

This idea of guidance is important; children need the framework and support to expand their ZPD. Since the ZPD defines the skills and abilities that children are in the process of developing, there is also a range of development that we might call a "stretch goal"(Mooney). For Vygotsky, supplying the child with a combination of theoretical and empirical learning methods is a more robust way to ensure cognition. This leads

Their anticipated and desired results for their education, personal or practical, may vary widely in unpredictable ways. The attitudes towards educational processes may differ due to the greater and more diverse social and life experiences that color perceptions of classroom life, even more so than the raw educational materials used in the classroom. The teacher must balance addressing individual needs through conferences, personal contacts, and allowing for more independent

Part.Theory Related to Final ProjectKey ConceptsHistorical Context and Historical FiguresValidity and AccuracyApplicability of Theory TodayConnection to Final ProjectNeo-Freudian TheoriesPsychodynamic. Tripartite division of self but less about psychosexual development than Freud. Builds on Freud�s theory of the unconscious, using dreams and other symbols but more reliance on and social and cultural influence on personality.Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, Erik Erikson, Karen Horney, Henry Stack Sullivan.More so than Freud, with more empirical research.