Evidence-Based Programs and Practices
Part 1: Define and Refine
Evidence-Based Theories
Evidence-based programs are defined as a prevention or treatment practice, that is based on consistent scientific evidence providing proof that the practice improves client/patient outcomes. The practice should be supported by sufficient documentation and peer-reviewed research that shows its effectiveness (Operational Definition for Evidence-Based Practices Addictions and Mental Health Division, 2017).
Programs draw from theory in that the theoretical framework developed by researchers and professionals serve as a set of parameters or guidelines for how to interpret evidence and how to implement the recommendations based on the evidence into one’s practice. Theories serve as the lens through which to look at the evidence. Just as a microscope has a lens and a focus so that one can see all the details of the subject, the theory allows the data to be put into perspective, and that perspective is defined by the theory or theories that are used in the research.
In the field of addiction, there are numerous evidence based theories: behavioral theories, pharmacological theories, psychotherapeutic theories, and so on. Each theory has been tested in research and examined from multiple dimensions. There is not always agreement on theories, as many studies can be contested based on the findings, the way the studies were conducted, how the sample was selected, and what methods of analysis were used. However, the important point when it comes to evidence-based theories is that the findings are consistent and the case can be made over time that the theoretical approach has benefits.
Questions Researchers Asked
One of the big questions researchers ask is how to integrate or implement evidence-based programs into their practices (Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology, 2006). Guidance for practice is typically developed based on evidence from studies that support the findings. Studies can be exploratory or experimental, but when the researcher is seeking to obtain evidence using a test that can be duplicated to verify the results that researcher is focused on contributing to the field’s understanding of the subject so that practice can be influenced and shaped by the evidence.
In the field of addiction, researchers ask, “What strategies or approaches are beneficial for clients or patients suffering from addiction?” For example, one approach that is currently being studied by researchers is animal therapy, wherein a person suffering from substance abuse or addiction is paired with an animal so as to learn what it means to care for another living creature outside oneself. The...
Comparing Behaviorism and Humanism Learning Theories in Understanding Mike\\\'s SituationIntroductionThe Case of Mike is one that deals with addiction and how to overcome it. Mike was introduced to drugs at an early age, as a treatment for ADHD. Eventually, he took to harder drugs and ended up prison. Now he is out and wants to stay clean. Two contrasting learning theories can be applied to the case study of Mike
Rather, Rogers argued that the therapist was there fundamentally in a support role, with the client in his or her own journey toward self-actualization. How then, does the client experience this kind of therapy? For many clients who are experiencing anxiety or self doubt, person-to-person therapy can lead them to discover their own ability to heal themselves. Assuming responsibility for one's own mental health by recognizing the range of
Clinical Psychology Dissertation - Dream Content as a Therapeutic Approach: Ego Gratification vs. Repressed Feelings An Abstract of a Dissertation Dream Content as a Therapeutic Approach: Ego Gratification vs. Repressed Feelings This study sets out to determine how dreams can be used in a therapeutic environment to discuss feelings from a dream, and how the therapist should engage the patient to discuss them to reveal the relevance of those feelings, in their present,
Inhumanity in the Stanford Prison Experiment Introduction According to Philip Zimbardo, dehumanization is the act of marginalizing another human being to the point where that person is seen to be less than human, outside the moral order—i.e., an animal. The moral order suggests that people should respect the lives of other human beings. When that order is ignored, dehumanization occurs. This paper will look at what dehumanization is, why it is so
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now