Claim of Negligence
In determining whether negligent care occurred, proper assessment is needed. This paper discusses the elements necessary for a case of negligence to be claimed. It then evaluates the case of the unstable child under the care of the new graduate nurse. Ultimately, the case centers on breaching duty of care and whether or not that breach occurred.
To determine if negligence occurred, four elements must be proved: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages (Cheluvappa & Selvendran, 2020). In other words, to establish a claim of negligence, firstly, there must be a demonstration of a duty of care owed by the defendant (the care provider) to the plaintiff (the patient or patients family). In healthcare, this duty arises naturally from the professional relationship between the healthcare provider and the patient (Sand et al., 2022). The second element is a breach of this duty, where the defendant fails to fulfill the obligation to provide care that meets the standard expected of them. This breach is evaluated based on what a reasonable and prudent healthcare provider would do in similar circumstances.
The third element is causation, which requires showing that the defendant's breach of duty directly caused or substantially contributed to the harm suffered by the plaintiff (Wright, 2022). This involves establishing a clear link between the actions or omissions of the defendant and the harm that occurred. Finally, the fourth element is damages, where the plaintiff must demonstrate that they suffered actual harm or losses as a result of the defendant's breach of duty. Damages can include physical injuries or financial losses. Successfully proving all four elements is necessary to establish a claim of negligence and seeking...
In this case, the new nurse had a duty to provide competent care to the child, as is standard in nursing practice. That much is clear. It is also clear, though, that the standard of care for a nurse is that the nurse needs to accurately assess and communicate changes in a patients condition to the healthcare team. The record shows that the nurse did this. In order to make a claim of...…used in his defense against a claim of nursing negligence, too. However, this would depend on whether the physician's orders were appropriate and if they were followed correctly by the nursing staff. The fact that the new nurse contacted the physician four times does show her attempt to seek guidance and follow medical advice.Overall, for a claim of negligence to arise from this case, there would have to be evidence of negligence via breach of duty, and that does not appear to be found. The nursing staff and the physician were all together in the loop regarding the childs condition and the situation of instability. The case is helpful in revealing some of the challenges of nursing practice, especially concerning situations for new graduates. Experience and seniority may be considered in evaluating the standard of care, but all healthcare professionals, regardless of their length of time in the profession, are held accountable when it comes to fulfilling their duty. The question is whether or not that duty is demonstrated. The responsibilities of the nursing staff, including the charge nurse and physician, should be taken into consideration to…
References
Cheluvappa, R., & Selvendran, S. (2020). Medical negligence-Key cases and application oflegislation. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 57, 205-211.
Radanovi?, N. M., & Vukuši?, I. (2020). Causation in medical malpractice. EU and comparativelaw issues and challenges series (ECLIC), 4, 771-797.
Sand, M., Durán, J. M., & Jongsma, K. R. (2022). Responsibility beyond design: Physicians’requirements for ethical medical AI. Bioethics, 36(2), 162-169.
Wright, R. W. (2022). Causation (contribution) and the'no worse off'limitation on liability. UWAustl. L. Rev., 49, 5.
Negligence Torts, Duty of Care and Available Remedies People commit torts all the time, intentionally and unintentionally, and many of these are dismissed, excused, ignored or otherwise allowed to transpire without resorting to litigation for remedies. For instance, if someone's foot is stepped on a couple of times in a crowded elevator, it may be a tort but it also may not be a big deal. In some cases, though, the
Negligence of Auditors Policy Considerations In the past one decade, there have been rampant cases against auditors, reflecting both on the litigious nature of a plaintiff's bar, which encourages claims against independent certified public accountants Owing to this, there have been numerous literatures encouraging the imposition of civil liability on accountants whose actions fail to conform to professional standards. Therefore, many courts after considering the scope of an auditor's vulnerability to negligence have
Negligence and Respondeat Superior: Should Employers be Held Responsible for Employee Negligence? Negligence "A person has acted negligently if he or she has departed from the conduct expected of a reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances" (West, 2008). To establish a claim of negligence, a plaintiff has to establish four elements: duty of care, breach of duty, factual causation, and damages (Berry, Sahradnik, Kotzas, & Benson, 2013). The duty of care
"Cause" is the next element needed for a successful negligence suit, but this is probably the most intricate element involved. The first aspect of "cause" is known as "cause in fact," and involves demonstrating that the defendant's actions, or lack of action, actually caused the harm suffered by the plaintiff. For example, the patient in the case actually suffered paralysis as a result of the surgery. It must be pointed
Negligence Generally, In order to sustain a cause of action for negligence, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant owed him a duty of care, that the defendant breached that duty of care by his negligent commission of an action (or by his negligent omission of action), and that the defendant's breach of that duty of care was the proximate cause of tangible harm to the plaintiff (Dobbs, 2001). In addition, and
Sanders's injury was more as a result of the "hard falls" of softball, rather than any sort of "rough treatment" that occurred as a result of improper supervision. The "rough treatment" category of head-butting football players can easily be distinguished from the more passive interaction between sliding ankle and first base. When the facts of a case clearly demonstrate improper supervision of "rough treatment" athletic activity, the courts have had
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now