Essay Undergraduate 522 words Human Written

CDC Measure of Associations

Last reviewed: ~3 min read
80% visible
Read full paper →
Paper Overview

Measure of associations Exercise 3.7 1. Rate ratio comparing current smokers with nonsmokers Rate ration = rate of current smokers/rate of nonsmokers (Rate of current smokers = rate of smokers per 1000 persons-years = 1.3) (Rate of nonsmokers = rate of nonsmokers per 1000 persons-years = 0.07) Rate ration = 1.3/0.07 =18.57 2. Rate ratio comparing ex-smokers...

Full Paper Example 522 words · 80% shown · Sign up to read all

Measure of associations Exercise 3.7 1. Rate ratio comparing current smokers with nonsmokers Rate ration = rate of current smokers/rate of nonsmokers (Rate of current smokers = rate of smokers per 1000 persons-years = 1.3) (Rate of nonsmokers = rate of nonsmokers per 1000 persons-years = 0.07) Rate ration = 1.3/0.07 =18.57 2. Rate ratio comparing ex-smokers who quit at least 20 years ago with nonsmokers Rate ration = rate of ex-smokers quitting at 20 years/rate of nonsmokers (Rate of ex-smokers quitting at 20 years = rate per 1000 persons-years = 0.19) (Rate of nonsmokers = rate per 1000 persons-years = 0.07) Rate ration = 0.19/0.07 = 2.71 3.

What are the public health implications of these findings? Based on the calculation above, it is evident that the rate of lung cancer incidences among smokers is way too high, 18 times, as compared to nonsmokers. This leads to the conclusion that, smoking is a factor contributing to the risk of lung cancer. This conclusion is further evidenced by the fact that, rate ration of lung cancer among those who quit smoking after 20 years as compared to nonsmokers is significantly less, approximately 3 times (CDC, 2006).

This finding points to the fact that, smoking is a risk factor for lung cancer. Public health implications for these findings are that, those who are smoking should be encouraged to stop forthwith as every puff is a step towards developing lung cancer. More importantly, those who haven’t smoked should be encouraged not to start.

Exercise 3.8 Odds ration of tuberculosis Odds ration = (exposed ill × unexposed well)/ (exposed well × unexposed well) = (28 × 133)/ (129 × 4) = 3724/516 = 7.22 Odds ration as compared to rate ration Rate ration = rate ration of exposed/rate ration of unexposed (Rate ratio of exposed = ill in East wing/total number of inmates in East wing) = 28/157 = 0.19 (Rate ratio of unexposed = ill in West wing/total number of inmates in West wing) = 4/137 = 0.03 Rate ration = 0.19/0.03 = 6.33 The odds ratio for developing tuberculosis in the prison is 7.22, while the rate ration is 6.33.

The difference between the two is 0.89, which translates to 14 percent of the rate ration. While the odds ratio is a measure for the association between exposure and outcome, rate ratio is a measure of the relative risk. As a result, it would be expected that for a disease with high outcome, the odds ratio and rate ratio would be on opposite extremes.

105 words remaining — Conclusions

You're 80% through this paper

The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.

$1 full access trial
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant included Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
"CDC Measure Of Associations" (2018, February 22) Retrieved April 22, 2026, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cdc-measure-of-associations-essay-2172199

Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.

80% of this paper shown 105 words remaining