Common Vs Statutory Law Essay

PAGES
4
WORDS
1330
Cite

Parental Rights At issue is whether a court ruled the right way when custody rights were assigned to a parent who was, legally, a step-parent. Indeed, the man in question was married to his wife and the wife had a child with another man. Because the biological parent was absent from the situation, the step-father was indeed the "father" based on presence, financial support and so forth. Further, it is noted in the case study that the step-dad treated his step-child with the same deference, respect and care as his twin children, which are both legally and biologically his. The question because whether that entitles him to legal and/or visitation rights.

Ruling

The step-father was initially awarded both legal rights and visitation. However, the former of those two was later rescinded and he only was given visitation rights in the end. The mother was pressing for the step-father to have no rights at all despite his prior sustained and perpetual presence in the life of the child. Presumably, the legal/custody rights were not given to the man because he is not the biological nor legal parent or guardian of the child. Thus, the court made an exception when it came to visitation and such but only because doing otherwise would likely cause mental harm to the child due to her de facto father being yanked away from her in an abrupt fashion due to the wishes and preferences of the mother. Beyond that, is has been deemed that the man has no legal/custodial rights other than the ability to visit and correspond with the child.

Analysis

There are a few points in question here that are extremely relevant. Some are mentioned in the case study while others are going to be fleshed out in the section to follow:

• There is no mention of whether the biological father gave up his rights to the child. Indeed, that is an important thing to consider given that...

...

It is fortunate that he got the visitation rights that he did since that would not normally be extended
• Based on the facts and details of the case, it would seem that an exception was warranted. Even though the mother is the biological mother and the biological father is not in the picture, she does and should have the ultimate right to do as she sees best for her child. That said, she seems to be using her legal status as a wedge to part her child and her ex-husband. Barring overarching circumstances or situations such as abuse, drug use or something like that, the mother engaging in such conduct is unnecessary and unfair and thus the exceptional circumstances, in at least some for, would be best since the interests of the child are what's in play here.

• If the step-father really wanted legal status, he should have sought to have the father relinquish his rights or otherwise ensconce his status as the legal father, even if he is not the biological one. Since he apparently made no effort to do that or otherwise adopt the child as his legal child, that is why he had to end up fighting in court

• Even with the lack of effort to gain legal parentage/guardian status of the child, it is clear that he was acting in the manner that a father could and should do

• The remedy for this situation is not something that should be done in all cases. Just because a step-father acts as the father in one or more ways does not automatically entitle him to rights (and the same goes for women in a step-parent situation).

• While the age of the child in question…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Walston-Dunham, B (2012). Introduction to Law. (Sixth). New York Delmar Cengage Learning.

978-1111311896. File

Tim Tyler (2012). Nailing the Baby Bar: How to Write Essays for the California First Year Law

Student Exam. Practical Step Press. 978-1-9361600-04-4


Cite this Document:

"Common Vs Statutory Law" (2017, January 23) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/common-vs-statutory-law-2163971

"Common Vs Statutory Law" 23 January 2017. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/common-vs-statutory-law-2163971>

"Common Vs Statutory Law", 23 January 2017, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/common-vs-statutory-law-2163971

Related Documents

Statutory Law Define Common law. Include examples and what U.S. Constitution amendments were implemented to protect the rights of businesses and organizations. Common law is based upon the decisions from previous court cases. They are binding in all legal proceeding. These rulings establish consistency and stability in the way decisions are made within the U.S. legal system. A good example of this occurred with Rehberg v. Paulk. In this Supreme Court

Law of Purchasing Supply What constitutes a contractual 'offer' according to English law? Your report should include references to common law, statute law, and European Union Law where appropriate. A contractual offer is when two parties display a willingness to enter into a contract. They understand that it will be binding once the offeree accepts the agreement. When a party is requested to offer a contract, this invitation to treat can be

Law and Business When Glenn
PAGES 20 WORDS 5286

During this Diaspora, the African Slave Trade transferred 9-12 million people from one continent to another with major repercussions on cultural and political traditions in the New World. There have been a number of modern Diasporas based on the post-Cold War world in which huge populations of refugees migrated from conflict, especially from developing countries (Southeast Asia, China, Afghanistan, Iran, Latin America, South American, Rwanda, etc.). Part 1.2.1 - Civil

woman was arrested in 2010 for riding a non-motorized vehicle on an interstate highway as she was escaping flash food that had hit the state of Tennessee. At the time of the arrest, the state of Tennessee had been hit with record flooding, which forced many areas in the state to be subjected to flash flooding where water rose very rapidly. In light of the devastating impact of the

The second case highlights how Commonwealth Chemicals Commission officers made a major mistake by not detaining Lucia for further questioning under the Act. This is troubling because she was in possession of the banned chemical, had large quantities of it, was storing it in her house and was importing the chemicals in from South America. These different elements highlight the fact that Lucia could be involved in some kind of

Common sense and compassion in the workplace has been replaced by litigation. The topic deals with many issues regarding the employee at the workplace. While about two decades ago the employees were at the mercy of the employer and the wage contract, more and more activism and the international requirements on protection of labor has created the needs of government interference which resulted in many laws and requirements beginning with social