Criminal Justice Organization and Management: The Paramilitary Model Adopted by Police Organizations
Introduction
The paramilitary model provides a degree of discipline and training to police officers that they might not otherwise obtain. The paramilitary model not only gives law enforcement officers the knowledge and skills regarding how to use force in an effective manner, it also gives police a type of professionalism that helps them to be more organized and opposed to corrupting influences (Potter, 2013). I believe that the paramilitary model adopted by police organizations is effective in some ways but has its limitations in others. For that reason, I think that it should be balanced out by a model of policing that takes into account the fact that police are not engaged in a military campaign against an enemy but are actually working among civilians in communities and are there to serve and protect them. Because police are routinely interacting with communities, there is also a need for them to apply a community-oriented model of policing so that they are not constantly applying military principles and militaristic examples of force on members of the community who would rather see a more open, supportive, and communicative relationship develop between law enforcement and community members.
Why the Paramilitary Model Can Help
Military training and discipline can bring a level of professionalism to a law enforcement organization that helps officers to take their role seriously, maturely and with great care and commitment for what they are meant to be doing. The paramilitary model is rooted in a type of hierarchical order or chain of command in which the decisions are made by leaders at the top (Cruickshank, 2013). Individual officers, like soldiers in the field, are meant to follow orders and if they do not follow orders, they are relieved of duty or disciplined so that they learn from their mistake. The focus and emphasis is on obeying the chain of command, which means that police departments must have very good leaders capable of making good decisions and training their officers to follow commands in the line of duty.
The paramilitary model can also help officers to feel more confident, united, and aligned on the same page, as there is less of sense of individualism and more of a sense of serving a greater ideal, which is defined by the organization at the top. The model insists that officers reflect the values and principles of the organization in all their actions, because every officer under this model is viewed as the face of the organization and the respectability of the organization is what matters most. If an officer dares to put a blemish on the organization...
This ownership of the issue will ensure that any changes that need to be implemented will not be met with resistance as well as ensuring their motivation toward the potentially changing tasks (Wagner & Gooding, 1987). A leader in this environment will need to continue to reinforce the level of achievement motivation in each employee, emphasizing department excellence and pride in job performance (Sing, 2002). Reminders about the goal of
Other specific risks to patrol officers, including those operating in pairs, include standard procedures suggested by past studies of the circumstances in which attacks on officers have occurred. For example, interviews with prisoners who assaulted officers during their arrests disclosed that many such attacks were initiated by the subject upon realization that their arrest was imminent. In many cases, it was the radio transmission alerting the officers of the subject's
Managing Criminal Justice Organizations Position Power: this is the power that emerges from the rank or the position one has within an organization. A supervisor of a group of custodians that also provide security at a university has a position from which he or she can decide what tasks to give the custodians (what buildings to clean and monitor for unusual behaviors). This kind of power is based on simple authority
They use the one-way system of communication. Such communication implies that they do not consult with the other members of the organization on critical issues that affect organizational performance. Autocratic leaders consider employee motivation to arise from the provision of structures rewards and punishments. They perform their tasks by using threats and punishment to evoke fear among the employees. In addition, these leaders focus on dealing with their assigned
criminal justice/security management research article. Add article post (hyperlink attachment). Provide a summary research (Do recopy abstract. Use words). Explain "qualitative." Be identify discuss elements research: Units Analysis Hypothesis Variables Operationalization: variables operationalized? Time dimension what conclusions made research? How conducted experiment differently? Criminal justice and security management: Article summary Dorn, N., & Levi, M. (2009). Private-public or public-private? strategic dialogue on serious crime and terrorism in the EU. Security Journal, 22(4),
Week 1 Discussion Decision making in large organizations can be difficult to properly grasp because its characterized by numerous issues that emerge within the organization. Quantitative and qualitative decision making processes in public finance are similar in the sense that they are utilized to analyze data relating to budget management and other relevant issues. These processes in turn help in effective decision-making with respect to the desired objectives. However, quantitative decision-making
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now