China may manufacture computers, but Americans design them. Poor government policy makes it more difficult for resources to be allocated to these knowledge industries, even though those industries are necessary to transition to a post-industrial economy.
Even if it is taken as a given that deindustrialization reduces real wages -- something for which the evidence is inconclusive (Krugman, 2008) -- the impact of deindustrialization is significantly affected by the policy responses to the situation. While real wages in one sector of industry may drop, good policy will ensure that the nation still has competitive advantages in other sectors, and this will allow wages to remain high. Deindustrialization, after all, is simply an effect of competition. By shifting the competitive mindset from an "us vs. them" approach, governments can focus on finding areas where competition is less great, and then exploit those areas to generate high wages.
There are examples where deindustrialization produced negative outcomes for economies - Williamson (2004) points to the case of colonial India as one. However,...
Deindustrialization has invited poor policy because its impacts are evident in the short-run (higher unemployment and lower industrial output). However, in the long run deindustrialization simply represents an opportunity for the reallocation of resources into less competitive sectors. If a nation sets its policies to take advantage of that opportunity, deindustrialization is not necessary bad for the economy.
Works Cited:
Krugman, Paul (2008), "Trade and wages, reconsidered,"? unpublished manuscript, presented at Brookings Panel on Economic Activity spring meeting.
Krugman, Paul (1994), "Competitiveness: a dangerous obsession,"? Foreign Affairs 73(2): 28-44.
Leamer, Ed (2007), "Outsourcing and globalization,"? EconTalk podcast (length 1:05:09), http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2007/07/leamer_on_outso.html
Williamson, Jeffrey (2004), "De-industrialization and underdevelopment: a comparative assessment around the periphery 1750-1939,"? unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Harvard
76). As automation increasingly assumes the more mundane and routine aspects of work of all types, Drucker was visionary in his assessment of how decisions would be made in the years to come. "In the future," said Drucker, "it was possible that all employment would be managerial in nature, and we would then have progressed from a society of labor to a society of management" (Witzel, p. 76). The