Philanthropy has been viewed as an ethical behavior stemming from moral virtue or moral duty. When philanthropic actions are conducted in exchange for what could be construed as personal gain, then what would be a moral act becomes a transactional or even selfish one. Donating money in exchange for some other gift, service, or benefit is not the same as selflessly bequeathing the same. “Pure philanthropy...is a transfer rather than a transaction in the sense that nothing is received in return,” (Keating, Pitts & Appel, 1981, p. 816). However, it may be unrealistic to expect that all philanthropic behavior stem from a sense of moral duty. The concept of a “pure” philanthropy in which efforts are transferred would also preclude any donation that was not anonymous, because of the way public recognition can be leveraged for personal or organizational gain. In fact, the motivation for transfer and transactional philanthropy is different (Chapman, 2016). Whereas the transactional donor does respond to benefits like recognition or seats to a gala dinner, the transfer philanthropist has a transformational attitude: their gift is designed to bring about the desired social justice change (Chapman, 2016). It is possible to achieve transformational philanthropic goals while marketing social causes as transactions, but ultimately the marketing...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now