Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Two persons to both maximize their respective self-interests will lead to conflict. Moreover, egoism inclines towards the exploitation of the weak. When a person is caught performing an illegal act or an act violating a professional code of ethics, it is almost always because of egoistic behavior that he committed it (Cengage).
Gun Control and Ethical Egoism
Law enforcers are allowed to carry weapons to use in the performance of their duty to arrest suspects and to protect themselves from criminal elements. Other individuals are also permitted to bear arms for justifiable reasons, mainly for protection, such as treasurers, bodyguards and prosecution witnesses in criminal cases. But the possession of weapons has not been totally strictly controlled. In many cases, they fall into the hands of criminals themselves or accidentally hurt or destroy persons at home like children. Although gun control laws have been in force to limit the un-authorized proliferation of weapons, the debate on the wisdom of gun control laws continues. Some oppose stricter laws while some press for them for a more peaceful society,
In Favor of Gun Control Laws
The main argument of this side is that these laws will reduce and discourage further violent crime and deaths, especially in the urban areas (Goodman, 2013). The easy accessibility of guns and other fire weapons makes killing others or oneself easy too. Guns kept at home by those who are licensed to keep them are far likelier to kill an innocent house member than an intruder or criminal. Military groups organized to protect the country from outside threats may have amateur members are not answerable to any superior. They are thus very dangerous with these weapons. The Second Amendment defense is not absolute as no right is when it conflicts with other rights. It justifies a well-regulated militia but not every individual citizen to possess deadly weapons (Goodman).
Opposition to Gun Control Laws
It is a Constitutionally-recognized and fundamental civil right to own guns (Goodman, 2013). The courts have upheld this right...
Gun ownership is also imperative for legitimate purposes by individuals, like hunting and self-defense. Guns can stop criminals and reduce crimes, especially in crime-infested areas. Women who own them can also be an equalizing force against stronger men who may attack them. As a rule, military groups and individuals who own guns provide security for the nation against tyranny and external attacks. If there were no guns to protect the American people, they would be easily defeated by these elements. And restricting gun ownership will not deter criminals who can always use other deadly weapons, like knives and chemicals (Goodman).
Guns and Ethical Egoism
Carrying and using guns are primarily intended for self-protection, which is basic human right. Self-protection, survival and self-interest are the objectives of ethical egoism and considered moral and natural. If these were the only reasons why guns are used by those authorized to carry and use them, there will be no need for gun control laws. The problem is that, due to their accessibility, they are used for settling situations not within the scope of duty. They also fall into the hands of those not authorized to use them, like members of the household, and cause unnecessary fatalities or injuries.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cengage (2013). Determining moral behavior. Chapter 2 FPO. Cengage Brain: Cengage
Sites. Retrieved on April 19, 2013 from http://www.cengagesites.com/academic/assets/sites/5054/Chapter2.pdf
Fieser, J. (2009). Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: University of Tennessee at Martin. Retrieved on April 19, 2013 from http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/#SSH2c.ii
Goodman, P. (2013). Pros and cons of gun control laws in the U.S. HubPages: HubPages,
Inc. Retrieved on April 19, 2013 from http://paulgoodman67.hubpages.com/hub/Pros-and-Cons-of-Gun-Control-Laws-in-the-USA
Moseley, a. (2005). Egoism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: University of Tennessee at Martin. Retrieved on April 19, 2013 from http://www.iep.utm.edu/egoism
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cengage (2013). Determining moral behavior. Chapter 2 FPO. Cengage Brain: Cengage
Sites. Retrieved on April 19, 2013 from http://www.cengagesites.com/academic/assets/sites/5054/Chapter2.pdf
Fieser, J. (2009). Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: University of Tennessee at Martin. Retrieved on April 19, 2013 from http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/#SSH2c.ii
Goodman, P. (2013). Pros and cons of gun control laws in the U.S. HubPages: HubPages,
Inc. Retrieved on April 19, 2013 from http://paulgoodman67.hubpages.com/hub/Pros-and-Cons-of-Gun-Control-Laws-in-the-USA
Moseley, a. (2005). Egoism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: University of Tennessee at Martin. Retrieved on April 19, 2013 from http://www.iep.utm.edu/egoism
Egoism and Moral Skepticism James Rachels's paper "Egoism and Moral Skepticism" begins by noting that he can trace his subject back to Plato's philosophical discussion of the myth of the Ring of Gyges -- Gyges gained the power of invisibility with a magic ring, and thus seduced queen, killed king, and seized the throne. In Plato's dialogue, the character of Glaucon argues that both virtuous man and rogue would be unable
Epistemology and Duty Ethics in Criminal Justice Ethical Issues 1 Ethics in Law Enforcement Agencies As Roufa (2019) notes, ethics in law enforcement are essential to prevent behaviors from going unchecked and bad reputations from being developed. Ethics in law enforcement agencies can provide guidelines, identify values that should be promoted, and dictate what sort of actions, behaviors and attitudes law enforcement agents should demonstrate. The Law Enforcement Oath of Office focuses on
Ethical treatment of prisoners is a complex question, involving the nature of the prison system in the U.S. And the nature of those incarcerated in it, as well as ethical obligations that individuals owe to society as well as those that society owes to those who are imprisoned. Deontological ethics might hold, for example, that those who have violated the law and the basic moral norms of society deserve to
Ethical Treatment of Prisoners The treatment of a society's prisoners has been an issue of debate for centuries. The emotions surrounding such treatment are considerable and reaching a consensus on the best and fairest method is often difficult. Torture is considered illegal in most civilized societies and, therefore, in order to maintain an acceptable level of treatment an alternative and more humane approach must be established (Filter, 2000). There presently exist two
.....personal ethics derive from a combination of established codifications of moral conduct, such as those embedded in political documents or in religious scripture, but also from my personality, my upbringing, and my worldview. I tend towards a utilitarian point-of-view, in that I do believe that the consequences of actions are more important than worrying about whether an action is inherently right or wrong. I also believe that there are situational
Prison Industrial Complex and the Private Prison System 1 Legal paternalism is the idea that the state can coerce individuals into doing something for their own good, whether it is preventing them from engaging in self-harm by holding them in a mental health facility against their will, or obliging an entire nation of free-thinking adults to wear surgical masks so that everyone feels safe from a flu virus. As Feinberg (1971) notes,