Group Dynamics And Teams Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1616
Cite

With workplace tasks becoming increasingly complex, the significance of teamwork cannot be overemphasized. Teamwork often facilitates faster and more effective execution of tasks. Nonetheless, managing a group or team of people can be a challenging endeavor in large part due to conflicts and communication issues. Indeed, conflict, misunderstanding, and miscommunication can greatly affect team success and productivity (Bateman, Snell & Konopaske, 2016). With reference to Kolb's learning model, this paper describes my own experience with a team. Following a description of the experience, I reflect on the experience, interpret the experience at a deeper level and identify ways to respond to a similar experience in the future.

Concrete Experience



At my place of work, I was recently appointed as one of the members of a team aimed at investigating the potential of a certain product the organization wanted to venture into. More specifically, the responsibility of the team was to evaluate whether the organization had the resources and capabilities to offer the product, the revenue potential of the product, and how it would implement the idea if found viable. The team was to thoroughly examine the market for the product and draft a comprehensive report to the management, providing recommendations whether or not to proceed with the idea. The report was to be submitted to the management in six weeks. Led by the head of business development, the team comprised personnel from various functions across the organization, including sales and marketing, research and development (R&D), procurement, and finance.

Reflective Observation



The team experience was one of a kind for me. It was my first time to work in an inter-functional team. I had worked in teams before, but I had not directly collaborated with individuals from departments other than mine. For me, working with staff from other departments made the task appear much easier. There was morale, enthusiasm, moral support, cooperation, and stimulating team activities, which I strongly believe were instrumental to the success of the team. I also got an opportunity to interact more with colleagues I had not interacted much with before. More importantly, we had a wonderful team leader, who cultivated an open and collaborative teamwork environment. He is actually one of the best team leaders I have encountered. Other members of the team also found the experience quite fulfilling, describing it as a significant learning experience in their career journey. The team...
...

One of the challenges stemmed from differences in objectives, priorities, and perspectives. For instance, while almost everyone was convinced that the organization needed to introduce the product as soon as possible, representatives from the finance department were quite concerned about the firm's financial capacity. Likewise, while some members favored a large scale implementation of the idea, some argued that going full scale without first testing the market would be terrible, thereby preferring gradual implementation of the idea or a pilot test. There were also disagreements on whether or not to partner with external entities in implementing the idea. Other challenges emanated from late attendance or skipping of team meetings, non-adherence to the team's rules, and laxity in fulfilling assigned responsibilities on the part of some team members. In spite of these challenges, the experience greatly enhanced my teamwork and communication abilities. I would love to be in such a team in the future.

Abstract Conceptualization



Broadly speaking, groups are formed to work together to achieve a specified objective. For instance, a soccer team has eleven members, all working together to score against a competing team and to prevent the competing team from scoring. With a team, a seemingly complex task becomes easier as two or more individuals direct their effort towards solving the task as a team. At the workplace, teams are crucial drivers of productivity and performance (Bateman, Snell & Konopaske, 2016). Teams are often assembled to develop a new product, evaluate the potential of a given market, reorganize business divisions or operations, assess potential targets for a merger or an acquisition, and so forth. In a team, members share knowledge and perspectives, consequently accelerating the accomplishment of goals, objectives, and tasks.

The formation of a team undergoes a number of stages as described by Bruce Tuckman's model of group development: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning (Margerison, 2003). These stages were quite evident during the above team experience. In the first stage, forming, the team is formed or assembled. Team members are introduced to one another, the team is familiarized with the task at hand, and roles and responsibilities are assigned. During the first meeting, each team member mentioned their name and…

Cite this Document:

"Group Dynamics And Teams" (2017, May 25) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-dynamics-and-teams-essay-2168364

"Group Dynamics And Teams" 25 May 2017. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-dynamics-and-teams-essay-2168364>

"Group Dynamics And Teams", 25 May 2017, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-dynamics-and-teams-essay-2168364

Related Documents

Group dynamics: Working as a nurse-Midwife Working as a midwife requires me to function as a member of a team, not simply an individual nurse. The midwife must coordinate her advice with other components of the patient's obstetric treatment team. The midwife must also work well with the patient's family. Groups are often said to be either task-oriented or person-oriented (Group Dynamics 1 PowerPoint, Slide 8). In the case of the

Group Dynamics Discuss the functions of formal and informal groups. How does each contribute to the organization? with examples Formal groups are organizations that have a fixed set of rules, structure and have procedures that leave little room for interpretation, and must be followed. As well, they have status symbol, limit activities of individuals in the group, set objectives and policies and coordination between people. They have rules that are readily observable

Group Dynamics Week 4 DQ
PAGES 7 WORDS 2261

The internal processes become more efficient because barriers in personal communication are broken down once the group is working towards the common purpose. Increasing cohesiveness in the group requires leadership that orients the objectives of group members more strongly towards the common purpose. This can be done a number of ways, including through individual and group task structure, the fostering of a common culture, the establishment of smooth communication

In a group situation, therefore, an emergent leader has an inherent power to be valued by a group of his or her peers. Rather than being viewed as superior, the leader's abilities are valued by other group members, with respect being earned rather than forced. As mentioned, communication is central to effective group functioning and leadership. Hence, a good group leader will also have a distinctive verbal style. Members who

Group dynamics in such an environment produce psychological and energy changes "fuelled by the underlying forces of motivation and anxiety"(Tyson, p.47). Stacey (1998) maintains that study of group dynamics in an educational setting is important because group interaction is seen as a "interaction is a "critical variable in learning and cognitive development" (1990 p.43 in Stacey, 1998, p.77) specifically in the "socio-emotional variables of group interaction, including motivation, satisfaction and

Adding conflict and competition to that precarious situation can be difficult, but is an important part of workplace group dynamics. However, conflict and competition can be both positive and negative components within a group dynamic situation. Jehn and Mannix (2001) discuss intragroup conflict and performance in their Academy of Management article, finding consistent results that implied the important nature of some conflict within workplace groups. The researchers found that