¶ … philosopher Paulo Freire espoused Leninism. The basis for this argument will be Freire's work, Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Paulo Freire

Paulo Freire's work, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, contains a thought-provoking passage whose gist is that oppressed individuals' pedagogy, enlivened by genuine, humanist (rather than humanitarian) generosity, is manifested as mankind's pedagogy. Pedagogy starts with the oppressor's selfish interests (an egotism masked by the insincere magnanimity of paternalism), making the oppressed population objects of the oppressor's humanitarianism, and itself maintaining and embodying tyranny (Freire, 2005 page 54). It serves as a dehumanization tool. Thus, as has been asserted previously, oppressed individuals' pedagogy can neither be formulated nor applied by oppressors. The espousal as well as actual implementation of an education system that is liberating in nature, by oppressors, would be contradictory to their motives.

Another passage of the book states that nevertheless, it is, indeed (although it may appear ironic), in the oppressed community's response to the cruelty perpetrated by their persecutors that a token of love can be found. Unknowingly or knowingly, the oppressed people's act of revolt (an act that is almost always, as fierce and aggressive,...

While the violence the oppressed were subject to at the hands of their oppressors stops them from being wholly human, their response to such cruelty is based on the yearning to pursue their right of being human (Freire, 2005 page 56). According to Freire, in the process of dehumanizing others as well as violating their rights, the oppressors themselves become dehumanized. As those who are oppressed strive to regain their human rights, they seize the authority of oppressors to rule and subdue others, and in the process, restore to their persecutors the humanity lost by them while exercising oppression. The above ideals would, definitely, not belong to a Leninist.
There is, however, a specific passage in the book that is most critical in justifying the argument that Paulo Freire wasn't a Leninist. Freire states that oppressors fail to perceive that their control on procuring and possessing more is a privilege, thereby dehumanizing others as well as themselves. They fail to see that they are stifled by their personal possessions, and no longer remaining humans, but only having possessions, as a consequence of their selfish desire to 'own'. For them, to have more represents an absolute right, won by them through personal "effort" and risk-taking…