Human beings are naturally antagonistic. Their existence in intelligible and sensuous worlds predisposes them to engage in wars to prove their might. However, they should apply the laws of reason, but it should be noted that the reason in question is not common to all humans. Therefore, some people may choose to disobey the law to the detriment of invoking war, and this confirms the evil in them.
Therefore, Kantian beliefs support the idea of having negotiation and compromise instead of as wars when resolving disputes. The attitude that we should take about war is that of having a self-contained world that has laws and rules and can translate negotiation and cooperation systemically to enable it to enter into a post-historic paradise of peace and posterity. On aspects of diplomacy, the United States and Europe have taken the issue in very different directions. For the Americans, they are quick in applying force. This has seen them allow people to own a gun with claims that the division present in the world is between friends and enemies, good and evil…
Fichte separate right from morality and is it a good thing? Should they be separated? Fichte's Philosophy of Right and Ethics Why does Fichte separate right from morality and is it a good thing? Should they be separated? Moral and political anxieties animate Fichte's entire philosophy and his perceptions to these issues that are innovative and at times tied together. His responses to Kant's vital philosophy in 1790 was a retaliation to