Moral Dilemma
Harvey's wife suffers from a deadly disease and if she does not take her prescribed medication soon she will surely die. The only way Harvey can obtain the medication is by stealing it from the pharmacy because he cannot afford to pay for it himself and no one is willing to help him. Harvey's story raises a host of moral dilemmas. First, the medical system is itself immoral because it is based on financial class rather than on humanitarian need. Second, the impetus to help others should prevail over profit and even the pharmacy might have a moral obligation to help Harvey's wife. Harvey has a moral obligation to help his wife. Third, Harvey breaks a law and a moral code by stealing but to do so he fulfills a much higher duty: to save his wife's life at the expense of no one else's.
If Harvey steals the medication from the pharmacy he does not hurt anyone. He is not depriving the pharmacist of his livelihood. He is not depriving another sick individual from having access to the same medication. Harvey only risks getting caught stealing and even if he were caught would be unlikely to spend any time in jail given the extenuating circumstances. Therefore, Harvey should steal the medication from a utilitarian perspective.
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.