Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
The one exception to Abelard's nominalism is the category of "human beings, whose forms are their immaterial (and immortal) souls. Strictly speaking, since human souls are capable of existence in separation form the body, they are not forms after all, though they act as substantial forms as long as they are joined to the body" (King 2004). Through this idea, Abelard strove to reconcile Christianity with nominalism and to elevate the human being.
The other great medieval nominalist of note is William Ockham. Ockham also subscribed to the Aristotelian ontology of realist empiricism, believing that universal essences "are nothing more than concepts in the mind" and no innate ideas exist apart from the mind (Kaye 2007). "The defense of nominalism undertaken by the 14th-century English Scholastic philosopher William of Ockham prepared the way for various modern nominalistic theories such as those of instrumentalism, pragmatism, semantics, and logical positivism" (Rausch 2010). Ockham, like Abelard, defended the reality of "individual substances and qualities" not abstractions (Rausch 2010).
In his epistemology, Ockham defended direct realist empiricism, according to which human beings perceive objects through "intuitive cognition," without the help of any innate ideas pre-existing within the structure of the mind, as asserted in Platonism. Ockham's writings suggest the blank slate of the human mind gives rise to all of our abstract concepts and provides us with knowledge of the world, not something that exists in our minds innately (Kaye 2007). Four steps existed in cognition, according to Ockham. The first, sensory cognition: receiving data through the five senses, is shared between humans and animals. The second, is an awareness and a perception of individual qualities in the world called intuitive cognition. "The third step is recordative cognition, by which we remember past perceptions. The fourth step is abstractive cognition, by which we place individuals in groups of similar individuals" (Kaye 2007). Such a creation of abstractions, however, is the product of the human mind alone, not an awareness of preexisting categories.
Realists had always maintained that "you perceive an...
Ockham asserted that while individuals within the same society may share similar abstractions as a part of culture, these abstractions are not created because of mental, preexisting categories or the existence of some Platonic 'apple.' Ultimately, all perceptions are located in specificity. The human mind is a powerful machine and capable of sorting data to become more efficient, but this facility is not proof of the independent existence of abstractions (Kaye 2007).
As Abelard stated that abstract words are created by humans, Ockham stressed that categories for objects, linguistic and otherwise, are human-generated, not eternal. Thus, they could be faulty and based upon incorrect sensory data. Abelard's philosophy paved the way for postmodern notions of language which suggested that ideas we take for granted as 'real' such as gender, are constructed notions, and Ockham's notions reinforced the idea that the process of empirical observation is a human one, and potentially faulty as it is not based in pre-existing Platonic ideals in the mind. Religion for Ockham was a leap of faith, while scientific and logical analysis was germane to the human world of the senses alone.
Works Cited
De Wulf, M. "Nominalism." The Catholic Encyclopedia. May 11, 2010.
http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/nominali.htm
Ess, D. "Notes on nominalism, realism, conceptualism." History of Modern Nominalism.
May 11, 2010.
http://www.drury.edu/ess/history/modern/nominalism.html
Kaye, Sharon. "Ockham, William of." January 3, 2007. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. May 11, 2010.
http://www.iep.utm.edu/ockham/#H2
King, Peter. "Peter Abelard." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2004.
May 11, 2010.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abelard/#2
Rausch, D .A. Elwell. "Nominalism." Evangelical Dictionary. May 11, 2010.
http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/nominali.htm
Works Cited
De Wulf, M. "Nominalism." The Catholic Encyclopedia. May 11, 2010.
http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/nominali.htm
Ess, D. "Notes on nominalism, realism, conceptualism." History of Modern Nominalism.
May 11, 2010.
http://www.drury.edu/ess/history/modern/nominalism.html
http://www.iep.utm.edu/ockham/#H2
May 11, 2010.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abelard/#2
http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/nominali.htm
However, when it comes to health-related issues, I do not believe that subjective personal impressions and feelings can influence one's ethical decision-making. The evidence is clear that smoking is harmful to the smoker, and also to the person who inhales second-hand smoke. Additionally, we were in my parents' home. I know that they have hard and fast rules about smoking on their property. My friend took a different point-of-view: he acquiesced
Philosophical Legal Theory: Analyzing the Rhetoric in Civil Rights Speeches by King and Wallace While Martin Luther King, Jr. (MLK) is remembered as a hero in the Civil Rights struggle, it is important to keep in mind that, during his time period, he was vilified by many who claimed that his efforts to secure equality for African-Americans were somehow unnatural. One of his most vocal opponents was George Wallace (Wallace), the
His social contract put forward the notion that citizens at some point give their consent to live under a "certain political structure" and that requires a social contract. John Locke is often seen as the "…philosopher of the American Revolution," Heineman explains. Locke's view was that in the early period of human existence, mankind lived in a state of nature, but though it was reasonably pleasant, there were problems. And
In fact, tolerance often stands in the way of engagement. Tolerance does not require us to attempt to understand one another or to know anything about one another. Sometimes tolerance may be all that can be expected. It is a step forward from active hostility, but it is a long way from pluralism" (Eck 1993). Achieving true dialogue and understanding, of course, is easier said than done. Also, teachers must
Philosophical Approaches The question of ethics, what the right thing to do vs. The wrong thing, can be a difficult one. There are occasions where right and wrong are black and white distinctions. The right thing to do is easy discernable, though it may not be the easiest things to do. However, this is the rare occasion. More often than not trying to determine right and wrong in a given situation
Philosophical Analysis of Animal-Human Interactions Both animal rights and ecocentrism discourage hunting, although for different reasons. Thesis: Animal rights philosophy views hunting from a moral perspective, as the unnecessary infliction of suffering on sentient beings, no less immoral than the persecution of human beings. Ecocentrism views hunting from a perspective of self-interest, as an activity with unforeseeable consequences which could threaten the ability of many life-forms to sustain themselves on planet