Abstract

This essay focuses on the possible ramifications, both negative and positive, of a Trump presidency, from the perspective of Trump as the President-elect.  Because Trump has no experience in public service, much of the paper is speculative and focuses on what is known about the people Trump is selecting for his cabinet.  The paper acknowledges that Trump, a Republican President, will be supported by a Republican House of Representative and Senate in Congress, as well as being in the position to support at least one, if not more, members of the Supreme Court, but also acknowledges that Trump may not have Republican congressional support for all of his policies.                                                     

Donald Trump Presidency: Will it Unite the Country or Destroy the Union?

Introduction

As of November 29, 2016, Donald Trump was the President-elect, though recount efforts in three swing states and allegations of Russian interference in the elections made it possible, if not probable, that he would not be confirmed by the electoral college.  Following an election where Trump lost the popular vote by over 2,000,000 votes, but won enough electoral votes to become the President-Elect, emotions were high.  Trump fans were thrilled that he won the election and began celebrating the idea that Trump would carry through many of his campaign promises.  Those who opposed Trump were surprised and alarmed that he won the election and began preparing for what would happen if Trump intended to carry out his campaign promises.  The public response was significant and somewhat dramatic.  Trump’s campaign was supported by white nationalist and other racist groups, and over were reported in the 10 days following his election (Miller & Werner-Winslow, 2016).  Anti-Trump protests occurred in major cities throughout the United States, and, while many of those protests were peaceful, some of them were not peaceful.  For example, anti-Trump protests in Portland contained enough criminal activity for the local police to call them riots (Ansari, 2016).  It seemed fair to describe the country being in turmoil and seemed unlikely that the country would come together and heal, which was advocated, not only by Trump, but also by his rival Hillary Clinton in her concession speech.
[caption id="attachment_1475" align="alignnone" width="595"] Figure 1: "Donald Trump" Source: Wikimedia[/caption]

Campaign Promises

These post-election events made it clear that people had very certain opinions about the direction that Trump’s presidency would take, but these beliefs were based largely on Trump’s campaign promises.  Trump was the only candidate for President in...
...

Wade; Trump’s promise to immediately stop Muslim immigration; and Trump’s promise to repeal and replace Obamacare.
In the immediate aftermath of his election, Trump walked-back his position on many of his campaign promises.  After meeting with President Obama, Trump praised parts of Obamacare and acknowledged that it would be far more complicated to repeal the law than he acknowledged while campaigning.  Although he did not abandon the idea of building a border wall, his staff acknowledged that it was unlikely to be a wall along the entire border.  However, Trump seemed to remain committed to appointing Supreme Court Justices that would repeal Roe v. Wade.  In addition, his team had not dismissed the idea of halting Muslim immigration and even suggested that a Muslim registry would not only be permitted, but that there was precedence for such a registry in the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II (Bromwich, 2016).  Furthermore, there was a general consensus that he simply could not carry out other campaign promises, such as bringing back coal jobs or manufacturing jobs because the free market simply would not provide a market for those goods.

Trump’s Cabinet

Because campaign promises are often simply vote-getting tools, a better way to predict how a politician will govern is to examine that politician’s history.  Trump had no history of public service, which means that examining his cabinet picks became one of the only ways for people to attempt to predict the path of his presidency.  Although Trump had promised to “drain the swamp” if elected, his cabinet picks were composed primarily of people who had either been associated with D.C. politics or who had been participants in big-business.  These included: former Goldman-Sachs partner Steven Mnuchin for Treasury Secretary; Elaine Chao, Labor Secretary under George W. Bush and wife of Mitch McConnell, as Transportation Secretary; Tom Price as the Secretary for Health and Human Services; Seema Verna as the administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; Don McGahn as White House Counsel; K.T. McFarland as Deputy National Security Advisor; Betsy DeVos as Secretary of the Department of Education; Nikki Haley as the U.S.…