Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Change Through Rapprochement
Egon Bahr's concept of "change through rapprochement" never really had prospects for success as the subsequent years showed and as hindsight, which always sees 20/20, indicates. The Communist case for "demarcation" for instance, reiterated in 1971, and the petition for an exit visa, written by the actor Manfred Krug in 1977, both showed that East and West Germany were moving in two diametrically opposed directions. Neither was willing to yield an inch and both proscribed certain thoughts and actions -- thought crimes, so to speak, for which Krug paid a price in 1977 (having lost a number of jobs because of a letter signed to protest the banishment of a friend). East and West Germany were also symbolic of the greater forces at work in the world -- the forces pulling and pushing and vying for power in the latter half of the 20th century -- Soviets on one side, and the U.S. on the other. The Cold War was raging red hot and whatever optimistic "change through rapprochement" existed in July of 1963 died in November of that same year when U.S. President Kennedy was assassinated in the cold light of day before a crowd of Texans. Kennedy had signaled rapprochement...
Kennedy's death signaled that the deeper levers of the State would not allow such rapprochement to go forward. Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush -- never was rapprochement anywhere near their policies (even when they tried to get it there -- as Carter did, for example, when he sought peace in the Middle East). Change would only really come when the Soviet Union would fall under the weight of its own corruption and the machinations of Western powers.
When Egon Bahr noted that "the American strategy for peace can also be defined by the formula that Communist rule should be changed, not eliminated" he was essentially revealing the wordplay that the West has come to be known for: doublespeak to use a term invented by one of the 20th century's most politically spot-on novelists. The "change" that the U.S. wanted was subversion -- and the CIA was readily engaged in exactly that type of operation thanks to the Marshall Plan's bottomless purse, opened for the Intelligence agency's covert operations and fronts, like Radio Free Europe. In truth, there was no hope for rapprochement. The East knew it…
References
Change through Rapprochement (July 15, 1963):
http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=81
The Communist Case for "Demarcation" from the West (February 10, 1971):
http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=171
http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=923
Cold War was a period of great danger and international tension, brought on by the power struggles between the United States and the Soviet Union. The communist ideology -- which the Soviets were aggressively trying to spread through Europe and elsewhere -- was seen as an enormous threat to the U.S., while the capitalist / democratic ideology was seen by the Soviets as a threat to their way of life
Cold War Truman 1945-1953 and expansion of communism As the 21 century approaches, there was every indication on the firmness of Present Harry S. Truman's reputation on the subject of his stewardship of foreign policy even though, as luck would have it, he took over Oval Office in the year 1945 inexperienced in affairs of the world. As he was approaching the end of his reign in the White House, there were
Marshall feared that their poverty might make them vulnerable to Soviet wooing, causing them to attach them to communism. America, therefore, felt that it had to preempt potential Russian manipulation by stepping in there first. Although Marshall emphasized that the program was open to all European nations, he structured it in such a way (by making capitalism part of its expected character and linchpin of performance) that it effectively
S.S.R., which would ostensibly eliminate the threat posed by the U.S.S.R.'s capabilities. The report takes on a tone almost encouraging that to happen. It was very much the public mood of the time that would have supported that initiative. That the world came so close to the use of nuclear confrontation during the Cuban Missile Crisis is indicative of this, and it was only the ability of JFK to resist
Cold War Polarity constitutes a system-level notion which associates with the distribution of power, actual or apparent, within the international system. For roughly the first 350 years of its being which means from about the culmination of 16th century to the middle part of 20th century -- that system had been a multipolar, with five, or six or seven powers of approximately analogous might continually manipulating for gains. Thereafter, since the middle
Relations with West improved a lot. Economic liberalization process also started after the rise of Gorbachev as many economic and social problems plagued Soviet Union. In the face of economic issues facing the empire the cost of managing the cold war with respect to the Cold War arms race almost endangered its survival. The Chernobyl catastrophe in 1986 made matters even worse for the Soviet Republic. On American front