Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Research Essay

PAGES
4
WORDS
1384
Cite

Mixed Methods Research

Two important aspects of qualitative research relates to the role of the researcher and the manner in which knowledge is viewed. These two aspects fundamentally distinguish qualitative research from quantitative research (Creswell, 2014). In qualitative research, the researcher seeks to cultivate a closer relationship with the subject(s). This means that the researcher focuses on a single or a small number of subjects, and utilises designs that allow closer interaction with the subjects such as in-depth interviews, observations, and focus group discussions. Cultivating a closer relationship with the subjects is informed by the need to gain a deeper understanding of the research phenomenon (Denscombe, 2010). This arises from the assertion that knowledge is subjective (Bryman, 2008). In other words, different individuals tend to have different meanings and worldviews about a given phenomenon. The role of the researcher, therefore, is to understand the unique interpretation a subject holds about the phenomenon in question, not the researcher's meaning or the meaning suggested by extant literature (Creswell, 2014).

These two aspects have important implications for criminal justice research. For instance, using qualitative research designs such as case study, ethnography, and phenomenology places the researcher in a better position to understand the psychological and behavioural characteristics of a certain criminal or type of criminals. More fundamentally, understanding the distinct nature of qualitative research enable consumers of research to more appropriately interpret published research findings. They interpret those findings oblivious of the fact that they may not be readily generalised beyond the subjects included in the study. These two tenets would be relevant in answering a criminal justice research question, especially with regard to questions that require a more detailed understanding of the research phenomenon as opposed to just cause-and-effect relationships.

Week 3 -- Discussion 2



Creswell (2014) provides six steps for conducting effective qualitative analysis. The first step involves organising and preparing the collected data for analysis. This step...
...

The second step entails getting a broad sense of the data. At this stage, the researcher goes through the data to grasp a general understanding and tone of participants' responses. Step three involves coding the data. This is a particularly crucial step as it makes the data more comprehensible. At this stage, the researcher should focus on creating simple, relevant, and fascinating codes. Step four encompasses describing the setting and themes. The descriptions appear in the findings section, meaning the researcher should convey the perspectives provided by the subjects. The fifth step involves representing the descriptions and themes, mainly through narrative text and illustrations such as tables and visuals, while step six entails interpreting the findings. The last two steps are vital as they present the theory to explain the research phenomenon, convey important information about subjects, highlight convergence or divergence between the present findings and past research, and highlight questions for further inquiry.
The six steps have important implications for evaluating criminal justice data and interpreting published research. Indeed, evaluating criminal justice data and presenting it in a manner that makes sense to both the researcher and the reader can be quite difficult, often taking a substantial amount of time and effort. Knowledge of these steps minimises this difficulty. Personally, knowledge of these steps will be useful in answering criminal justice research questions wherein qualitative designs such as ethnography and phenomenology would be the most appropriate.

Week 4 -- Discussion 1



Two important tenets that underpin quantitative research are generalisation and cause-and-effect relationships (Creswell, 2014). In quantitative research, knowledge is viewed as objective and universal (Martin & Bridgmon, 2012). This means that the findings obtained from a sample within a given population can be representative of the general population. This aspect is what fundamentally differentiates quantitative research from qualitative research. The findings essentially explain the relationship between two or more variables. Generating…

Cite this Document:

"Qualitative Quantitative And Mixed Methods Research" (2017, February 05) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/qualitative-quantitative-and-mixed-methods-research-essay-2168116

"Qualitative Quantitative And Mixed Methods Research" 05 February 2017. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/qualitative-quantitative-and-mixed-methods-research-essay-2168116>

"Qualitative Quantitative And Mixed Methods Research", 05 February 2017, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/qualitative-quantitative-and-mixed-methods-research-essay-2168116

Related Documents

Variables that could increase the likelihood of insider threat can be certain personality traits or satisfaction levels revealed by employee questionnaires. If an employee, for example, believes that he or she is not receiving the full benefits merited by his or her service level or skill set within the company, it can be determined as more likely for this type of employee to act less ethically than those with

mixed methods research study. Each of the three studies must have been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Analysis of a Qualitative Research Report: Problem statement: What is the problem the study was conducted to address? Many schools have not adopted new electronic-era media literacies into their core curricula, but understanding these new, evolving literacies is critical to understanding how students learn today, especially with regard to low-income students, for several reasons (Turner,

Mixed Method Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methodologies Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodology research Quantitative methodologies tend to be data-driven in nature. The presumption of the correct 'way of knowing' in quantitative research is positivistic in nature. It is assumed there is an objective, concrete truth that can be learned through empirical observation and the careful construction of an experiment. Quantitative methods of research often use the scientific method or quasi-scientific methods of study

Although more time consuming and costly, mixed-methods research can also be more fruitful than either qualitative or quantitative methods alone. Mixed methods combine qualitative and quantitative in ways that are suitable for answering a complex set of research questions. Because the researcher can use more than one research design in the same study, mixed methods can “answer a broader range of research questions,” (Center for Innovation for Research and Teaching,

mixed methods research simply taking half a quantitative plan and half of a qualitative plan and putting them together?" And an articulation of the challenges to using a mixed methods strategy of inquiry. To what extent is mixed methods research simply taking half a quantitative plan and half of a qualitative plan and putting them together? Mixed methods approaches blend aspects of both quantitative and qualitative research designs in their construction.

Fielding, N. (2010). Mixed Methods Research. International Journal of Social Research, 13 (2), 127 -- 138. In the field of criminal justice and security management, there are a wide variety of techniques used to understand the best approaches for interacting with stakeholders. Fielding (2010) determined that the mixed method approach is the most effective. This is because it is examining different aspects of the problem and conducting a separate study to