Tale Of Stable Mable's Unstable Investment John Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
911
Cite
Related Topics:

¶ … Tale of Stable Mable's Unstable Investment John Smith

Accounting 101

Stable Mable is a privately held company with a fiscal year ending on September 30th. Because of its private status, the only external reporting requirement on the company is that they must provide audited annual financial statements to shareholders and other financial leaders.

In order to seek additional levels of income, Stable Mable invested $20 million into a mutual bond fund in October of 1997. By the end of the following fiscal year, the investment went south and had an unrealized holding loss of $1.3 million. Stable Mable had to classify and establish just how to adjust their financial statements for the investment's losses. Their options were to account for the losses as realized losses or to exclude the losses from earnings as a separate component of shareholders' equity.

In addition, decisions made now could effect future financial statements because Stable Mable is considering an IPO offering. Investors would like to see the financial statement process in accordance with the SEC's accounting standards.

Key Issues

During the 1998 fiscal year, Stable Mable adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB): Securities Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS), Statement No. 115, Accounting For Certain Investments In Debt And Equity (Issued 5/93).

Statement 115 addresses accounting and reporting for investments and based on statement 115, Stable Mable classified the deteriorating investment as 'available-for-sale'...

...

The unrealized holding loss was listed as a separate component of shareholder's equity.
At the end of the 1998 fiscal year, the company performed an 'impairment analysis' on the investment and concluded that the overall investment decline was not 'other than temporary' and an independent auditor concurred.

As the bond fund continued to deteriorate, a second impairment analysis was done in 1999 as the investment continued to lose value. Stable Mable had to recognize a $1.8 million charge against 1999 earnings.

After terminating the relationship with the previous independent auditors, Stable Mable brought in a second independent auditing firm. The new firm questioned whether or not Stable Mable should have taken the impairment charge in 1998 or 1999.

Review Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Rules

Each day, accountants make decisions as to how they should record business transactions. Decisions are often based on the financial objectives of the organization they work for but at other times the accountants use Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GAAP rules are not a fixed set of rules -- they are simply guidelines or a group of objectives and conventions that govern how financial statements are prepared.

A review of Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (Issued 5/93):

Statement 115 addresses accounting and reporting for investments in equity securities and those investments are to be classified in categories:

Debt securities…

Cite this Document:

"Tale Of Stable Mable's Unstable Investment John" (2003, March 23) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/tale-of-stable-mable-unstable-investment-145277

"Tale Of Stable Mable's Unstable Investment John" 23 March 2003. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/tale-of-stable-mable-unstable-investment-145277>

"Tale Of Stable Mable's Unstable Investment John", 23 March 2003, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/tale-of-stable-mable-unstable-investment-145277

Related Documents

GAAP vs. IFRS As globalization begins to hit full stride, new rules and customs must be addressed with older and more established practices. The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) represents a global perspective on the accounting rules for global organization. The United States has followed their Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) to dictate the regulations dealing with domestic companies. The purpose of this essay is to examine both of these

GAAP Newsletter Dear Managers: In the 21st century, particularly after a combination of the Global Recession and issues surrounding companies like Enron and Arthur Anderson, there has been a new paradigm about accounting in the media, for stakeholders, governments, and professionals alike. There are a number of ways to accomplish this new paradigm, which revolves around trust in reporting numbers, the use of numbers in particular financial documents, and the manner in

GAAP There are two main types of accounting, cash accounting and accrual accounting. The former is used mainly in private businesses, and small ones at that. The latter is the basis for generally accepted accounting principles and is therefore much more common in business, especially larger businesses. This paper will explain some of the differences between these two forms. The differences between cash accounting and accrual accounting stem from philosophical differences. Cash

Introduction There are a number of different areas of difference between US GAAP and IFRS. Nguyen (2017) points out that one of those areas of difference is with respect to the treatment of intangible assets. Intangible assets show on the balance sheet, but what types of intangible assets and how they are valued differ between these two different accounting systems. This report will highlight these differences, and their implications. US GAAP Treatment There

Introduction In 2016, the chief accountant of the SEC, James Schnurr, announced that he would not recommend that the SEC should mandate, or even offer the choice, for US companies to use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This announcement was believed to be the "death knell" for the convergence between GAAP and IFRS, a project that had already stretched more than a decade with only moderate success (Katz, 2015). The Merits of

GAAP Was Authored by Two
PAGES 2 WORDS 535

The authors also point out that in the hierarchy of the GASB statements, interpretations, technical bulletins and the role of consensus approvals of GASB also need to be seen as the development of future Implementation Guide recommendations for future years as well. In summary, the authors provide an excellent overview of how the hierarchy of GASB statements relate to the Implementation Guides produced. Impact of the article: This specific article