Two Natures In Christ Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1623
Cite

Nicene Christology The Councils

The Council of Nicaea convened in 325. The Council of Constantinople followed in 381. The Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon were convened in 431 and 451 respectively. At all of these councils, the main issues were around the nature and personhood of Christ. His relationship to the Father, the relationship of the Holy Spirit to both, the meaning of the Trinity, the humanity and divinity of Christ—all of this was discussed and argued in different ways. The arguments went on for more than one hundred years as new ways of thinking about Jesus and God arose. People like Arius and Nestorius were trying to apply logic and reason to an issue that had to largely be taken on faith. In other words, they were trying to rationalize the God-Man so that it made sense, but the Church wanted them to accept the mystery of God Christ as both deity and man at one and the same time.

The main issue at the Council of Nicaea was the Arian heresy. Arius had raised questions about the nature of Christ—was he wholly god or wholly man? What was his nature? Arius held an essentially anti-Trinitarian view of God and believed the Christ was begotten by the Father but not pre-existing like the Father from all time. Thus, Arius maintained Christ had a different nature. The Council proclaimed that Christ had two natures—a human and a divine, both existing simultaneously in His One Person, which was equal to the other Two Persons of the Holy Trinity. The Nicene Creed was codified, in which Christ was defined as being consubstantial with the Father.

Emperor Theodosius called the Council of Constantinople to order. The Nicene Creed had to be confirmed and the Macedonian heresy had to be addressed. Arianism was also still an issue, and a new pope needed to be selected who was not an Arian. Athanasius was exiled for being an opponent of Arianism, as many church members leaned towards the heresy. At the same time, the Macedonian heresy attacked the divinity of the Holy Spirit. The outcome was that the Creed was confirmed and the heresies condemned.

Emperor Theodosius II called the Council of Ephesus to order. The heresies of Nestorius and Pelagius were addressed and the idea that Mary only conceived the man Jesus and not God the Christ was also addressed. Cyril of Alexandria opposed Nestorius, who advocated for the position of...

...

Cyril convinced the Council that Nestorius was wrong—but Nestorius refused to submit nonetheless.
Emperor Marcian called to order the Council of Chalcedon. Nestorius was still spreading the idea that Christ had two personalities rather than two natures. The Council aimed to show that Christ had one personality that was whole and unified—i.e., that He was both God and man, without any division or separation between his two natures ever at any point. The Chalcedonian definition put forward by the Council was that Christ had two natures that were joined in hypostasis. Christ was affirmed as being One Person rather than as having two distinct personalities. He had two natures that hypostatically unified, but he was one person. Theodoret of Cyrrhus had been in attendance and had been sympathetic to the position of Nestorius—but he agreed to reject the ideas of Nestorius so as to keep his position in the Church. With that, the Nestorian heresy began to fizzle out.

Outcome

The Church Fathers reached the conclusions they did because it was important for them to recognize Christ as being One with the Father and the Holy Spirit and also as having unity in and of himself. Allowing Christ to be defined only as a man in one regard opened the door to people banishing the idea of Christ’s divinity altogether. Indeed, Meyendorff (1964) makes the case the Arian heresy helped lead to the development of Islam, which viewed Christ only as a prophet and not as divine. In other words, the Church was conscious of the idea that by separating Christ’s divinity from His humanity would cause some to view him as man only, which is what Meyendorff (1964) says Islam did. Thus, the Council of Nicaea affirmed the two natures of Christ. The Council of Constantinople affirmed the Trinity. The Council of Ephesus affirmed the Christokos, and the Council of Chalcedon affirmed the hypostatic union.

By affirming the single personhood of Christ and the dual-nature aspect of Christ, as well as the union of the three divine persons in one God—i.e., the Trinity—the Church was able to clearly define the doctrines that the early Christians were expected to believe. The Nicene Creed and the Chalcedonian definition helped to bring clarity and light to an…

Cite this Document:

"Two Natures In Christ" (2018, October 06) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/two-natures-in-christ-essay-2172485

"Two Natures In Christ" 06 October 2018. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/two-natures-in-christ-essay-2172485>

"Two Natures In Christ", 06 October 2018, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/two-natures-in-christ-essay-2172485

Related Documents

Orthodox Position of the Person of Christ Jesus Christ is at the center of the Christian doctrine as every theological thought in Christianity revolves around his personality as one of the Holy Trinity. Christ's divine and human nature on one side and his mission of savior of the world, on the other, have provided endless sources for discussion and debates over the decades. Theologians, historians and philosophers have tried to reconcile

In the second edition to Christ-Centered Preaching: Redeeming the Expository Sermon, Bryan Chapell provides a guide to expository preaching based on the fundamental principle that the purpose of preaching is to promote union with Christ. According to Chapell, union with Christ has personal, community, and theological or cosmological implications. The second edition to the Chapell text includes several amendments and additions, encouraging libraries to stock both copies. Moreover, the author

Christ and Humanity
PAGES 3 WORDS 955

Christology: The Identity of Jesus as Both God and Man In the Bible, Jesus identifies himself as both God and man most explicitly in the book of John. In the first book of John, the Apostle John famously writes: "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth" (John 1:14).

In the Personal Form, on the other hand, individuals do not get away with moral transgressions. Their personal approach to life is colored not by materialism but by core spiritual ethics and values. The Person is elevated above the commodity and not vice-versa. Prayer is also made communal: as such prayer has the power to transform not just the individual but the community as a whole. Moreover, the prayer is

Tale of Two Cities An Analysis of Duty and Sacrifice in Dickens' a Tale of Two Cities Charles Dickens' 1859 A Tale of Two Cities deals with the dichotomous nature of man: the good and the bad, the selfish and the selfless. These two natures are observed in the two (ironically look-alike) characters, the dutiful Charles Darnay and the derelict Sydney Carton. Yet, just as the novel embodies a dichotomy, shown

Tracing the development of Christianity thousands of years ago demonstrates a journey that was as varied and as rife with controversy, confusion and integrity as developing democracy in America. In examining this multi-faceted and a times nebulous process, greater insight into modern-day Christianity can more easily be gained. The seven ecumenical councils of the early Church had clear positions regarding Jesus Christ within the evolving Trinitarian theology of the era.