Selling Nuclear Technology The sale of United States nuclear technology to other countries has gained more criticism, especially in light of the September 11 attacks and the current war against Iraq. Despite these security concerns, however, many corporations still advocate efforts to repeal federal laws regarding the sale of such technology to countries such as China. This paper examines the pros and cons of both positions, paying particular attention to the history and ramifications of continued sale of nuclear technology.

The United States should continue selling nuclear technology

Common perception holds that foreign countries like China, Pakistan and Algeria are the main supporters of the sale United States nuclear technology. However, many American companies such as Westinghouse, Bechtel and General Electric support the move to allow the export of American nuclear technology and parts to countries such as China.

For these companies, the reasons are economic. Domestic demand for nuclear technology has decreased drastically in the environmentally conscious 1990s. Many nuclear energy companies were thus forced to look elsewhere to market their technologies. An official at the ABB Combustion Engineering, for example, states that the survival of many such companies rely on their ability to open plants in China -- a move that could generate at least $40 billion for the beleaguered industries.

Increasingly, the American nuclear industry has had to look outside the country for more markets. The Chinese, for example, represents 50 to 75% of new market of nuclear technology.

Proponents of lifting trade restrictions on the transfer of nuclear technology also argue that when used judiciously, the sharing of nuclear technology with friendly countries could foster stronger national ties. Such ties would be even more important as the Bush administration tries to rally support for the war against terrorism.

The Bush administration, for...

Pakistan, for example, is a potential key ally because of its strategic location near Afghanistan. In exchange for sharing its technology, the United States could gain an important staging site for its military operations in the Middle East. Indonesia, on the other hand, is the most populous Muslim state in the world. The country's goodwill would be important to the Bush administration.
Furthermore, supporting China with nuclear technology in its bid for dominance over Taiwan would provide the United States with a much larger market for its products.

Finally, the controlled sharing of nuclear technology is also a way for the United States to regulate nuclear proliferation. It was much easier to regulate nuclear proliferation when the only "enemy" was Russia. Today, however, the break-up of the former Soviet Union has resulted in at least four sovereign states with nuclear weapons -- Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus. Due to problems like corruption and political turmoil, these countries are having difficulty regulating their nuclear weapons. It is therefore in the United States' best interest to share its own expertise to help these countries regulate and perhaps dismantle their nuclear capabilities. Otherwise, one possible alternative would be the sale of such weapons to rogue states and terrorist groups, who could then use these weapons against the United States.

The United States should stop selling nuclear technology

For many critics, however, the sale of such weapons has dangerous implications for United States security interests. In the book Selling Armageddon, author Lee Rensselaer traces the smuggling and proliferation of nuclear weapons from Russia to other newly independent states. Lee's research has uncovered a clandestine network of professional smugglers who sell…