This paper provides a detailed critical summary of the American Health Information Management Association's (AHIMA) nine-part white paper series on meaningful use of electronic health record (EHR) systems. Drawing on the ARRA and HITECH legislative frameworks, the series addresses EHR certification criteria, Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments, clinical quality measures, privacy and security requirements, and reporting obligations for eligible providers and hospitals. The summary evaluates the substance and limitations of each white paper, noting where definitions are lacking and where meaningful ethical, legal, and fiscal questions go underaddressed.
According to Heubusch (2009), defining meaningful use is important because "it triggers $17 billion in Medicare and Medicaid incentives for the adoption of electronic health record systems." The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services further notes that "providers will reap benefits beyond financial incentives — such as reduction in errors, availability of records and data, reminders and alerts, clinical decision support, and e-prescribing/refill automation." Standards defining meaningful use of health information management technologies must be set for ethical, legal, and fiscal reasons. In response to this need, the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) published a nine-part white paper series on the issue.
The nine-part AHIMA white paper series begins with a poorly written overview that does not provide a working definition of terms, offer meaningful use criteria, or any other pertinent data. Only four pages long, the "Overview of the Meaningful Use Final Rule" is practically useless as a standalone reference document.
The second white paper is five pages long and defines the ARRA meaningful use program as incentive-based rather than entitlement-based. Healthcare organizations are not required to apply but will receive incentive payments if they choose to participate. The document defines what qualifies as an electronic health record, as certified EHR technology, and clarifies payment years and periods. A table outlining stages from 2011 to 2014 fills space that could otherwise be used to address deeper ethical issues related to the fair and meaningful use of patient electronic health data.
The third white paper covers incentive payments and program requirements. Notably, hospital-based physicians do not qualify for incentive payments under the program as structured.
The fourth AHIMA white paper addresses meaningful use and EHR certification. Using similarly vague terminology as the previous white papers, the author discusses issues related to information technology literacy without adequate precision. Key terms — including standards, implementation specifications, certification criteria, qualified electronic health record, complete EHR, certified EHR technology, and disclosure — are all explained in paltry terms that leave the reader without clear operational guidance.
"White papers 5a and 5b on reporting measures"
"White papers 6a and 6b on clinical quality measures"
"Final white papers on eligibility and HITECH preparation"
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.