This paper explores the transportation challenges faced by modern airports managing increasingly heavy passenger traffic. It evaluates three primary solutions: automated people movers (APMs), which offer speed but require significant capital investment and maintenance; travelators or moving walkways, which paradoxically may reduce overall efficiency and create safety hazards for elderly and encumbered travelers; and buses, which provide flexibility but limited capacity. The paper argues that no universal solution exists, and airport planners must balance efficiency, safety, passenger experience, and budget constraints when selecting appropriate transportation methods based on their facility's specific needs and daily passenger volume.
Airports today are more heavily trafficked than ever before. This places an unprecedented burden on airport terminals to move people from point A to point B efficiently. Modernized airports have been forced to cope with these challenges in unique ways to improve passengers' experiences safely and to expedite their movement for their own sake and the sake of the airport. However, for every problem solved by these new conveniences, problems may arise regarding their use. There is no universal prescription for every airport as to the "right" way to transport people.
Automated People Movers take the form of trains that can move people quickly between different terminals, along with their luggage. Washington Dulles, one of the busiest airports in America, has an Automated People Mover (APM) underground train and passenger walkway system that connects the airport to three of its major concourses. According to a 2005 report on the system, "Its purpose: to keep people moving efficiently through the terminal of this burgeoning hub while the airport rapidly expands. The annual growth rate at Dulles is 25.7 percent, compared to 2.9 percent at other airports throughout the country" (Moving people, 2005). The conveyance is specifically constructed of extruded aluminum and rubber tires to minimize wear and tear.
People movers have also been adopted at Miami International Airport, in Japan, and many other Asian cities and airports. The downside is that these people movers are expensive and must be operated on a regular basis to ensure that people are not waiting around for the next train.
There is also a need to move people quickly within terminals, not between them. Travelators or moving conveyor belts, combined with escalators, are another popular technique to accomplish this objective. Yet while travelators are increasingly popular and sophisticated in their design, some time-motion studies indicate that they are not as efficient as one might hope. Researchers have found that using the travelator at airports, especially at busy times, can actually slow passengers down because people reduce their walking pace on the human conveyor belts and cause blockages. According to one study, "time gained even without any congestion is minimal and when you add extra people you would be better off walking unaided" (Alleyne, 2009). In other words, simply encouraging people to walk through interconnected passageways may be more efficient, provided they are able-bodied. Providing additional assistance in the form of mechanized wheelchairs or individual conveyances might be more effective for transporting those with mobility issues versus the expense of entirely restructuring the airport.
A further issue with travelators is safety. Although defended by proponents as enhancing the safety of the elderly and passengers weighted down by packages, statistical evidence indicates they may actually cause injuries. Travelators "often catch out tired and elderly travellers who find it difficult to maintain balance coming off and on the moving pathway. They can also disorientate drunken passengers and those loaded down with luggage" (Alleyne, 2009). The London Underground travelator has been linked to 933 injuries from their use (Alleyne, 2009). At Rome's Tiburtina station, a prominent university professor was crushed to death when "after a travelator collapsed and she was pulled into the cog wheels." Additionally, at Boston Airport, a drunken sushi chef was killed "after getting his head stuck" in a subway escalator during a fall (Alleyne, 2009). These tragic incidents underscore the real safety risks that accompany widespread travelator installation.
A further option for passengers is to take buses between terminals. At the famously spread-out Heathrow Airport, as well as offering transportation options in the form of covered walkways and the Heathrow Express train, there are also buses available to take between terminals (Heathrow Express, 2014). Buses have the advantage of more specialized mobility, such as the ability to make additional stops for travelers with special needs. However, they cannot transport as large a volume of persons per trip as fixed-rail systems.
"Context-dependent selection based on airport size and budget"
You’re 88% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.