This paper examines the Army change process and its role in helping Sergeant Majors (SGM) and Command Sergeant Majors (CSM) prepare units for upcoming combat operations and garrison training. It outlines the key components leaders must master: understanding change process rules, identifying allowable actions, entering change control criteria, and tracking change states. The paper argues that fluency in the Army change process enables senior NCO leaders to guide their troops through organizational transformation—shifting from a counterinsurgency-focused force to one that is flexible, adaptable, and capable of meeting a broad range of joint force combat commander requirements.
The Army change process is a complex and demanding undertaking that must be carried out with careful attention to detail. This paper examines how the Army change process can assist the SGM/CSM in preparing for the next combat operation as well as for training in garrison. The Army change process takes place in order to meet the evolutionary requirements of the operational environment. This process embraces flexibility, adaptability, depth, and responsiveness, along with the experience of operating among populations across a wide range of missions and activities in which the Army is involved.
Any future operational environment requires that the Army prepare ready forces for a wide variety of activities and military operations that are broader in scope compared to the current counterinsurgency focus the Army maintains. Understanding this larger context is essential for senior NCO leaders charged with translating strategic direction into unit readiness.
The Army change process entails several key components, the first of which is a clear definition of its governing rules. The SGM/CSM must be fully conversant with the rules the Army change process entails so that they can effectively guide their troops through it. Understanding these rules makes it easier for the SGM/CSM to move swiftly through each stage of preparation ahead of an impending mission. With a thorough understanding of the change process, progression from one stage to the next during preparations for a combat mission or garrison training becomes far more manageable (Oracle and/or its affiliates, 2013).
The second component involves specification of the allowable actions within the Army change process. The SGM/CSM must be well aware of which actions are permitted so that they understand what they are expected to do — and what they are not. This awareness helps ensure that everything executed within the change process is sanctioned and therefore valid. As a result, these leaders are better positioned to guide their troops in the correct direction, in accordance with what is specified by the Army change process.
This clarity is particularly valuable as troops prepare for a combat operation or for garrison training, since soldiers will understand precisely what is expected of them at each stage. Consistent, informed leadership at the SGM/CSM level minimizes confusion and reduces the risk of procedural errors during critical preparation phases.
Third, the SGM/CSM must know how to enter the Army change control criteria. This knowledge is critical because it guides them in helping their troops engage with and embrace the change process. Armed with this understanding, leaders can prepare their soldiers for what the process entails, how to navigate it, and what outcomes are expected at each step (Oracle and/or its affiliates, 2013). Competence at this stage ensures that the transition into new operational modes proceeds in an orderly and mission-focused manner.
"How leaders guide troops into the change process"
"Tracking progress and generating official records"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.