This paper presents a first-person analysis of a real-life negotiation scenario: the purchase of a 2011 Acura TL at a car dealership, including a trade-in transaction. The paper walks through each stage of the negotiation process — research and preparation, setting clear financial objectives, the actual dealership exchange, and a post-negotiation analysis. Drawing on principled negotiation theory and concepts from Fisher, Ury, and Patton's Getting to Yes, as well as Stone, Patton, and Heen's Difficult Conversations, the author demonstrates how academic negotiation frameworks can be applied to everyday consumer situations to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.
The paper exemplifies theory-to-practice application. The author identifies specific academic frameworks — principled negotiation, interest-based bargaining, and separating people from problems — and then traces each concept through their actual dealership experience. This approach validates the theories while simultaneously demonstrating the author's command of the material.
The paper follows a clear four-part arc: (1) pre-negotiation research and financial goal-setting, (2) a narrative reconstruction of the dealership exchange, (3) a two-part analysis combining intuitive reflection with systematic theoretical analysis, and (4) a concise conclusion summarizing lessons learned. This structure mirrors a standard case-study format, moving from context to action to evaluation.
Negotiation skills are important in a wide variety of life situations. Acquiring these skills early greatly reduces the chance that one will be taken advantage of by unscrupulous individuals. Negotiation skills can be used in the business environment as well as in everyday life, and for these reasons there is great value in developing them. The purpose of this paper is to explain the use of negotiation in the context of a real-life scenario.
Negotiation is always a tricky endeavor, and the purchase of a new home or vehicle can be particularly challenging. This paper focuses on the purchase of a new car — specifically, a 2011 Acura TL purchased at an Acura dealership. I also held the title to an existing vehicle that I intended to use as a trade-in, so that its value could offset the cost of the new purchase.
The first step in my preparation was to consult reputable reviews of the 2011 Acura TL. I turned to Edmunds for this purpose, as it is widely recognized as a source of unbiased automotive reviews. My research revealed that the vehicle had compelling performance, perfect crash scores, a spacious interior, solid build quality, and a range of current technologies. The perfect crash scores were especially significant to me, as safety is a top priority. The site also reported that the base model 2011 Acura TL is front-wheel drive, powered by a 3.5-liter V6 producing 280 horsepower and 254 pound-feet of torque, with a five-speed automatic transmission. In Edmunds' performance testing, the base TL went from zero to 60 mph in 6.7 seconds — on par with most base-model luxury sedans — with EPA-estimated fuel economy of 18 mpg city, 26 mpg highway, and 21 mpg combined. I also compared the Acura to other cars in the same class and found that, in terms of safety, reliability, and resale value, it ranked among the best. These findings led me to decide on the 2011 Acura TL.
In preparing for negotiations, I took care of several practical and important steps. I determined the value of my trade-in and the fair market price of the car I wanted to purchase. According to the Kelley Blue Book, the 2011 Acura TL had a base price of $35,305, and my trade-in was worth approximately $7,000. Knowing these figures was essential to negotiating a fair price for both vehicles and reduced the likelihood that I would be taken advantage of. It also helped me stay grounded and avoid letting my desire for the new car lead me to overpay or accept too little for the trade-in.
I set clear objectives to ensure the negotiations would not fail. I established how much I could afford to pay per month and, working backward, how much I needed to receive for the trade-in to offset the purchase price. I could afford to pay no more than $33,000 for the vehicle before subtracting the $7,000 trade-in value. This would bring the financed amount to $26,000, which was the maximum I was prepared to finance. I was also aware that taxes and registration fees would add to the total cost.
I took care to understand both my own strengths and weaknesses and those of the salesperson. One strength in my position was the broader economic context: the market was still recovering, car sales had declined, and salespeople were working harder to earn commissions. If I could make a persuasive case that the car should sell below the retail price — and demonstrate that my offer was not far below it — I was confident I could close the deal. I also reasoned that a lower commission would be preferable to the salesperson than no commission at all.
Before entering the negotiation, I wanted to make sure my information was solid so that I would not need to rely on being quick or clever in the moment. I mentally rehearsed different hypothetical scenarios that might arise so I would be ready to present my case calmly and confidently. I also thought through the salesperson's likely resistance to lowering the price, and reminded myself that a reduced commission was still better than a lost sale.
I also clarified what I wanted to communicate during the negotiation. My goal was to purchase the 2011 Acura TL at a fair and reasonable price. To that end, I made sure I had a firm grasp of the car's price, its specifications, the value of my trade-in, and the monthly payment I was targeting before I ever spoke to a dealer.
In preparing to communicate with the dealer, I also considered the context of buying from a dealership rather than a private seller. I researched whether the dealer was offering any incentives, such as cash back or low-interest financing. This particular dealer was offering 0% financing for up to five years for qualified buyers, and I intended to make sure that incentive was applied to my purchase.
Nonverbal communication was another element I prepared for. I planned to maintain strong eye contact with the salesperson and offer a firm handshake, both of which signal confidence and seriousness.
All of the research I had gathered — on pricing, trade-in value, vehicle specs, and dealer incentives — was what I intended to use to demonstrate to the salesperson that I came prepared to make a deal and that I knew exactly what the transaction should cost. I reviewed these figures once more before going to the dealership to ensure I had a firm command of the key numbers.
Finally, I wanted to make sure my overall conduct reflected a genuine interest in negotiating professionally. I planned to dress appropriately and make a good first impression, so the salesperson would understand from the outset that I was serious and not there to waste anyone's time.
I arrived at the dealership on a Thursday afternoon and parked my car. As I began to look around the lot, a salesperson approached me, extended his hand, and introduced himself. I made eye contact and returned a firm handshake. He asked how he could help me, and I told him the make and model I was interested in purchasing. He proceeded to describe the car's features and mentioned the dealership's 0% interest incentive on 2011 models. As we spoke, we made our way to the specific vehicle I wanted. I checked the specs and the price listed on the window — it was $5,000 more than I was willing to pay. When the salesperson offered a test drive, I accepted. He retrieved the keys and we drove the vehicle for about 20 minutes. I enjoyed the way it rode and felt even more motivated to complete the purchase.
When we returned to the dealership, we went into the salesperson's office to discuss pricing and the trade-in. He examined my car and agreed to the $7,000 trade-in value — an outcome I was not surprised by, given the vehicle's excellent condition both inside and out.
"Principled Negotiation." Retrieved February 25, 2011, from http://www.negotiations.com/definition/principled-negotiation/
Stone, D., Patton, B., & Heen, S. (1999). Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most. New York: Penguin Group.
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.