Other Undergraduate 1,064 words

Contingency Planning and Employee Theft in Security Management

~6 min read

Abstract

This paper presents a structured chapter review and critical analysis drawn from Fischer et al.'s Introduction to Security (9th ed.). Part One examines the key elements of an effective contingency plan, emphasizing protection of people, infrastructure, information systems, and the importance of risk assessment and hazard identification. Part Two explores employee theft — arguing for prosecution to the fullest extent of the law, identifying behavioral warning signs of dishonest employees, and explaining why organizations are morally and practically justified in discharging employees who steal. Part Three distills salient points from each chapter, stressing proactive planning and early detection of employee dishonesty as essential leadership responsibilities.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

The paper consistently ties its arguments back to a single authoritative source, demonstrating how to build a focused academic review grounded in a primary text.
It moves logically from definitions and principles (what a contingency plan requires) to applied ethics (why theft warrants prosecution), showing purposeful argument sequencing.
The salient-point sections function as effective mini-conclusions per chapter, synthesizing the most important takeaways and reinforcing the paper's core claims.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates the use of direct quotation integrated with analytical commentary. When the author quotes the organization's "moral obligation to its employees" from Fischer et al., the quotation is not left to speak for itself — it is immediately followed by an interpretive sentence that connects it to the broader argument about discharge justification. This technique shows how to deploy textual evidence effectively in an academic review.

Structure breakdown

The paper is organized into three labeled parts. Part One addresses contingency planning elements (Chapter 11 review). Part Two shifts to employee theft — covering prosecution rationale, behavioral warning signs, and discharge justification (Chapter 12 review). Part Three offers salient-point syntheses for each chapter, functioning as thematic conclusions. This tripartite structure mirrors a standard chapter-review assignment format and keeps analysis clearly compartmentalized.

Introduction to Security Management Concepts

This review examines key concepts from Chapters 11 and 12 of Fischer et al.'s Introduction to Security (9th ed.), covering the essential elements of contingency planning and the organizational response to employee theft. Each section concludes with a synthesis of the most salient points drawn from the respective chapter.

Contingency Planning: Key Elements and Best Practices

The key element of any contingency plan is that it must be able to keep people secure and protected. If a crisis occurs, people need to feel assured that all employees, visitors, customers, and suppliers are safeguarded from any harm that could arise. Another essential element is the ability to secure and protect the core components of the business, such as its infrastructure and critical processes, while minimizing disruptions to operations (Fischer et al., 2013).

Furthermore, a strong contingency plan will safeguard all information and information systems, including those that affect supplier and client connections (Fischer et al., 2013). A good contingency plan is one that makes accurate baseline assumptions to support effective planning. It must also incorporate risk assessment and vulnerability analysis before the plan is finalized (Fischer et al., 2013). A sound contingency plan will account for all types of hazards and engage in a critical process of identification to ensure comprehensive preparedness.

Employee Theft: Prosecution and Organizational Justice

Employees should be prosecuted for stealing to the fullest extent of the law. Employees who steal have broken the bond of trust between themselves and their employers. An employee who steals can never be fully trusted again, because that person has demonstrated a lack of ethical integrity. This means the employee must face prosecution as a legitimate form of discipline and punishment.

This response is also critical because, if one employee is stealing, others may be doing the same, may be aware of it, or may at least be considering it. It is therefore necessary to make an example of the offending employee and to use the punishment as a warning to all others. Additionally, prosecuting the employee to the fullest extent of the law represents the most complete expression of justice available. The organization has been wronged, and holding the employee accountable is the most appropriate way to ensure that justice prevails.

3 Locked Sections · 485 words remaining

Warning Signs of Employee Dishonesty · 130 words

"Behavioral indicators of potentially dishonest employees"

Why Organizations Discharge Employees for Theft · 140 words

"Moral and practical case for terminating thieves"

Salient Points: Planning, Honesty, and Leadership Responsibility · 215 words

"Chapter synthesis and leadership takeaways"

You’re 33% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Contingency Planning Risk Assessment Employee Theft Organizational Justice Dishonesty Signals Workplace Security Moral Obligation Disaster Planning Trust Breach Managerial Responsibility