This paper examines the key corporate governance considerations facing two entrepreneurs, Dan Ramirez and Susan Perdona, who plan to establish a business in Bangalore, India, with backing from their respective families. It addresses the principal-agent problem inherent in overseas ventures, the formation of a board of directors to protect shareholder interests, the challenge of double taxation on repatriated profits, and the regulatory requirements imposed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The paper argues that a well-structured corporate model, combined with local expertise and transparent governance practices, is essential to the venture's success in the Indian market.
The paper demonstrates applied case analysis: taking theoretical frameworks from corporate governance (principal-agent theory, shareholder rights, transparency) and systematically applying them to a specific international investment scenario. This technique bridges textbook concepts and real-world business decision-making, a core skill in undergraduate business and finance courses.
The paper opens with a situation overview that introduces the key stakeholders and the business context. It then moves through four interconnected concerns: governance structure and board formation, managing overseas agency relationships, the double taxation problem for foreign investors, and compliance with India's SEBI regulations. Each section builds logically on the previous one, moving from internal governance outward to external regulatory obligations.
Dan Ramirez and Susan Perdona are interested in starting a new company in Bangalore, India. They wish to locate some R&D staff there along with a small sales force to tap into the Indian market. Their families are also interested in the opportunity to invest. The type of corporate governance they select to manage the venture is a critical success factor in the new business division's success. Both the managers and investors will undoubtedly need to deal with the principal-agent problem, given that the venture is overseas. Since the investors will be foreign-based, they will want to ensure that they are given rights and treated equitably as shareholders. They will also want to ensure that their agents act with integrity and maintain ethical business behaviors at all times. Furthermore, the investors will want to ensure there is full disclosure and transparency.
To achieve all of these objectives, Ramirez and Perdona, along with their respective families, will want to form a corporate model with a board of directors. The company could choose a local manager to oversee daily operations and have the board present to provide oversight as well as vote on any major decisions. This would ensure that the stakeholders have a say in significant company decisions. Foreign members of the board should vote by proxy on major decisions that the company makes.
The governance framework under which the board operates will dictate the decision-making process and should be carefully considered given the international commerce situation. There must be a balance achieved between local controls — so that the business can remain responsive to the local market — and the interests of the foreign stakeholders.
The principal-agent problem is a central concern when investors are geographically separated from those managing their assets. In this case, the foreign investors must rely on a locally appointed manager to act in their best interests. Establishing clear governance policies, performance accountability mechanisms, and transparent reporting structures within the board framework is essential to mitigating this risk and ensuring that the local agent's decisions align with the goals of the overseas investors.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.