This paper examines René Descartes' use of methodological doubt in the Meditations on First Philosophy as a strategy for establishing certain truth. It traces the key steps by which Descartes dismantles reliance on the senses, considers mathematical truths, introduces the possibility of a deceiving force, and ultimately concludes that the act of doubting itself proves his existence as a thinking thing. The paper also highlights the theological context shaping Descartes' argument — particularly his effort to reconcile science and religion — and concludes by presenting a significant objection: the unresolved problem of how the mind and body, conceived as separate entities under Cartesian dualism, are actually connected.
The strategy Descartes uses to arrive at his conclusions is commonly known as the "doubt everything" approach. Formally, this method of determining the truth of things is called methodological or radical doubt. The strategy is based on the premise that any part of an argument that gives Descartes reason to doubt must be dismissed. This may seem extreme, but the method was extremely important to the success of his writings. Descartes wanted to arrive at conclusions that no one could argue against. To do this, he begins his book by stating that he will not assume anything — nothing will be taken for granted as truth. He then proceeds to dismantle our common perceptions of the world, including our reliance on the senses for information. After dismantling these fundamental beliefs, Descartes' aim is to build a newer, stronger foundation upon which to base his work.
Descartes' book Meditations on First Philosophy was originally conceived as a book about physics. However, because of Galileo's misfortunes with the Catholic Church over his scientific writings, Descartes — himself a devout Catholic — was worried about upsetting the Church. To avoid any such conflict, he wrote the book as an illustration of how science and religion can work successfully together. His goal of aligning these two schools of thought is an important part of how he arrived at his conclusions in the Second Meditation.
The first step in Descartes' argument that he is a thing that thinks, doubts, and so forth, is his dismantling of the senses as reliable sources of truth. This removal of the senses illustrates the distinction between a priori and a posteriori beliefs. He follows this step with an examination of mathematical truths, using them to suggest that the identity theory is an a priori truth. However, he then undermines this possibility by introducing the idea that some malevolent force could be deceiving him at every turn.
At the point when it seems Descartes is both convinced he is being constantly deceived and at risk of having no foundation of truth upon which to base his future writings, he finds a silver lining. He realizes that although his conclusions seem to leave him empty-handed, the very process of arriving at such conclusions is exactly what he needs to get started. In other words, he has found doubt in everything — but the finding of that doubt is itself something. Because he doubts, he must exist. He could doubt everything his senses told him. He could even doubt that he had a body. But he could not doubt that he had a mind, because if he had no mind, how could he doubt?
"Mind-soul distinction and its religious significance"
"Critique of how mind and body connect"
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.