This paper examines four theoretical frameworks used to analyze behavioral development and drug use among young African American males. Beginning with Hartup's Developmental Pathways Model, which emphasizes the dual influence of family and peer groups, the paper proceeds through Vygotsky's Social Development Model, Bronfenbrenner's Social Ecological Model, and Pepper's Contextualism. Each framework progressively broadens the scope of influence—from immediate family and peer relationships to ecological systems and global cultural forces—offering a multi-layered understanding of why drug use may emerge in this population. The paper synthesizes these perspectives to argue that no single factor, including genetics, social interaction, or environment, fully explains behavior in isolation.
Understanding behavioral development—particularly drug use among young African American males—requires drawing on multiple theoretical frameworks. The four models examined here, the Developmental Pathways Model, the Social Development Model, the Social Ecological Model, and Contextualism, each offer a progressively wider lens through which behavior can be analyzed, from immediate family dynamics to global cultural influences.
The Developmental Pathways Model was advanced in 1978 by W. W. Hartup, whose paper focused on the family and the peer group as "the two worlds of childhood" (Domitrovich, 2001). According to this model, a child's experience within the family directly influences his or her experience within the peer group, and this relationship is cyclical: peer group experiences in turn influence feelings and dynamics within the family, and vice versa. Hartup's work was significant because it added the dimension of peer influence to the study of children's social-emotional development, at a time when research had focused primarily on family interaction.
While the family environment is still regarded as the primary influence on behavior—whether positive or negative—peer relations are shown to play an important role in areas such as social support, skills development, and buffering a child against loneliness and social anxiety. Where healthy peer relations are lacking, aggression, school failure, psychological stress, and problems such as drug use may result (Domitrovich, 2001).
There are, however, mitigating factors such as genetics, which research has shown to significantly influence negative behavior beyond purely external influences. The nature/nurture debate has long engaged this question, and several researchers have concluded that genetics may override other influences in shaping behavior.
L. S. Vygotsky is the primary theorist behind the Social Development Model (Blunden, 2001). He identifies two levels at which the cultural development of a child takes place: first at the social level, which later begins to manifest at the individual level. An individual's choices are therefore primarily shaped by his or her social perceptions and experiences, meaning that all functions an individual develops depend on the type of social interaction that occurs during that individual's development.
Vygotsky further introduces the concept of the "zone of proximal development" (ZPD), which is fully or inadequately developed depending on the level of social interaction that takes place. For Vygotsky, social development is the primary determinant of human behavior across the path to maturity. When applied to African American males, this theory suggests that these individuals are largely shaped by their social interactions. When drug use is condoned and promoted within a social environment, it becomes highly likely that individuals within that social group will engage in drug use.
"Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems framework"
"Pepper's contextualism and global environment"
Taken together, these four models illustrate that drug use among young African American males cannot be attributed to any single cause. Family dynamics, peer relationships, social interaction, ecological systems, genetics, and the broader historical and global context all intersect to shape individual behavior. A comprehensive understanding of this issue requires drawing on each of these frameworks in combination.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.