This essay analyzes Emily Dickinson's poem "I heard a Fly buzz" through the dual lenses of scientific objectivity and subjective human consciousness. Drawing on scholarship by Eric Wilson and Michael Ryan, the essay examines how Dickinson uses a fly buzzing near a dying narrator as both a clinical detail of the body approaching death and a symbol of humanity's restless search for meaning. The essay argues that the speaker's post-mortem narrative position transforms ordinary sensory perceptions into ultimate, final experiences, elevating the fly to a near-totemic symbol. The poem is read as an infinite loop in which a ghost preserves the last moment of consciousness before death erases all perception.
The paper demonstrates close reading in conjunction with critical synthesis. The student moves between direct quotation of Dickinson's lines and scholarly commentary, then builds an independent interpretive argument on top of both. This layered approach — text, critic, original claim — is a hallmark of strong undergraduate literary analysis.
The essay opens with a thesis-bearing introduction that names the poem's central tension. The second paragraph introduces Wilson's framework and applies it to the fly as a literal and symbolic object. The third paragraph deepens the argument using Ryan's observation about the grammatical anomaly of a dead speaker, developing the "ghost" reading. The conclusion synthesizes the dual-reading framework into the image of an infinite loop, giving the paper a satisfying sense of closure without overclaiming.
In her poem "I heard a Fly buzz," Emily Dickinson explores the moment just before the death of the narrator, as she watches a fly buzz about in the final moments before sight fails her. In comparing the human experience to the buzzing of a fly in the face of a mortal curtain, Dickinson presents a simultaneously clinical and emotionally subjective consideration of death — one that examines the minute physical details of a scene in order to extract some ultimate meaning before the finality of death. The fly serves as a reminder of the banality of death as well as the importance of the meaning bestowed by human perception.
According to Eric Wilson, in his essay "Dickinson's Chemistry of Death," "Dickinson, avatar of Janus, takes a double stance […] she approves the power of the scientific method for exploring the corpse while undercutting the validity of scientific conclusions about the enigmas of dying" (Wilson 28). Though at first glance "I heard a Fly buzz" appears to have no explicit examination of a corpse, the narrator's own body is in fact the corpse, even if it does not fully become so until after the conclusion of the poem. Thus, the fly, with its "uncertain stumbling Buzz," can initially be read as a literal fly buzzing around the speaker's soon-to-be corpse — the last image the speaker sees before "the Windows failed" and death overwhelms her (Dickinson lines 13, 15).
In this initial reading, the fly represents the coldly analytic presentation of the body and works in conjunction with the poem's strictly sense-perceptual description of the moment of death. Aside from the third stanza, each section of the poem involves a sense perception of the immediate environment of the soon-to-be corpse. These sense perceptions, however, offer a bridge between the speaker's "double stance": on the one hand, they fit the strictly scientific, objective presentation of the body moments before death, and the attention to the fly can be seen as a way of demystifying the corpse and its accompanying fauna. On the other hand, these same sense perceptions reveal the ultimately futile human attempt at finding meaning in a coldly objective world, because each perception is automatically given additional weight and ultimate significance — they are, after all, the final sense perceptions of the speaker. In this way, the fly is elevated to an almost totemic position, offering one final subject around which the speaker can orient her thoughts before the finality of death erases all perception and thought.
In "I heard a Fly buzz," Emily Dickinson uses the image of a fly buzzing around a person in the process of transitioning into a corpse as a way of considering humanity's limitations when confronting death and its consequences. The poem is relayed through a series of sense perceptions and constitutes the recounting by a ghost of the final thoughts immediately before death — thoughts focused on something as banal as a fly, yet made overwhelmingly and infinitely important by their status as the speaker's final thoughts. The ghost of the speaker can only ever recount these last few moments before death, and so, even though she cannot offer any information or comfort regarding anything beyond the mortal barrier, she does at least maintain the final instance of consciousness, preserved in the infinite loop of the poem.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.